References

• Adams, A. E., Sullivan, C. M., Bybee, D., & Greeson, M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women, 14(5), 563–588. doi: 10.1177/1077801208315529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, A. E., Tolman, R. M., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., & Kennedy, A. C. (2012). The impact of intimate partner violence on low income womeńs economic well-being: The mediating role of job stability. Violence Against Women, 18(12), 1345–1367. doi: 10.1177/1077801212474294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderberg, D., & Rainer, H. (2012). Economic abuse: A theory of intrahousehold sabotage. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 282–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191. doi: 10.1177/1524838002250769
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, M. A., Gillig, P. M., Sitaker, M., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., & Grigsby, N. (2003). ‘Why doesn’t she just leave?’ A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18(3), 151–155. doi: 10.1023/A:1023564404773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, O. W. (2000). Why battered women do not leave, part1. External inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1(4), 343–372. doi: 10.1177/1524838000001004003
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, G., & Boréus, K. (2005). Textens menning och makt. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bograd, M. (2010). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation and gender. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic Violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender and culture (pp. 25–39). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandwein, R. A., & Filiano, D. M. (2000). Towards real welfare reforms: The voice of battered women. Affilia, 15, 224–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, E. (2004). His money or ours? Financial abuse of women in intimate partner relationships. Coburg: Coburg Brunnswick Community Legal and Financial Counselling Centr. Inc., rapport.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, L. (2016). Ofridstid: Fäders våld, staten och den separerande familjen. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. C. (2012). Intimate partner violence and welfare participation: A longitudinal causal analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 808–828. doi: 10.1177/0886260512455863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronister, K. M. (2007). Contextualizing women domestic violence survivors’ economic and emotional dependencies. American Psychologist, 62(7), 706–708. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.7.706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocker, D. (2010). Shifting power for battered women: Law, material resources, and poor women of color. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins. Readings on Race, Class, Gender and Culture (pp 369–389). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299. doi: 10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Ekbrand, H. (2006). Separationer och mäns våld mot kvinnor. [Separation and men’s violence against women]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet, Sociologiska institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2003). I skuggan av pappa. Familjerätten och hanteringen av fäders våld [In the shade of daddy. Family law and the handling of fathers’ violence]. Stehag: Förlags AB Gondolin.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M. (2010). Makar emellan. Äktenskaplig oenighet och våld på kyrkliga och politiska arenor, 1810–1880 [Between spouses. Marital conflicts and violence in religious and political arenas, 1810–1880] (PhD thesis). Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The tree worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fareld, V. (2008). Att vara utom sig inom sig [To be outside yourself within yourself]. Logos. No. 9. Pathos. Munkedal: Glänta produktion.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler Snyder, G. (2012). Multivalent recognition: Between fixity and fluidity in identity politics. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 249–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Haeseler, L. (2013). Themes of coping in the spectrum of domestic violence abuse: A review of the literature. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(1), 25–32. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.751230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harslöf, I., & Ulmestig, R. (Eds.). (2013). Changing risks and policy adaptions in the Nordic welfare states. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegren, C.-G. (2009). Erkännande [Recognition]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Hilson, M. (2011). The Nordic model. Scandinavia since 1945. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hirdman, Y. (1998). Med kluven tunga. LO och genusordningen [Forked tongue. LO and the gender system]. Stockholm: Atlas.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts. Gothenburg: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2003). Erkännande. Praktisk-filosofisk studie [Recognition. A practical – philosophical study]. Gothenburg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, A. (2011). Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: A comparative exploration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 202–220. doi: 10.1177/160940691101000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, S. (2009). Recognition and judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 12(4), 403–417. doi: 10.1080/13691450902981418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandaswamy, P. (2010). ‘You trade in a man for the man’: Domestic violence and the U.S. welfare State. American Quarterly, 62(2), 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist, J., Fritzell, J., Hvinden, B., & Kangas, O. (2012). Changing social equality. The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. H., & Drevdahl, D. J. (2006). Women, abuse, and the welfare bureaucracy. Affilia, 21(1), 84–96. doi: 10.1177/0886109905283135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landenburger, K. M. (2006). The dynamics of leaving and recovering from an abusive relationship. Journal of Obstetric, Gynaecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 27(6), 700–706. (1998). doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02641.x
   Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., Casey, E., & Meyers, M. (2010). Frontline workers responses to domestic violence in public welfare offices. Social Work, 55(3), 235–243. doi: 10.1093/sw/55.3.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., Oxford, M., & Gillmore, M. R. (2007). Longitudinal effects of domestic violence on employment and welfare outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(7), 812–828. doi: 10.1177/0886260507301477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lødemel, I. (1997). The welfare paradox. Income maintenance and personal social services in Norway and Britain 1946–1966. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lövgren, S. (2014). Att köpa sin frihet’. Ekonomiskt våld och andra strukturellt sanktionerade härskartekniker [To buy your freedom ‘. Economic violence and other structurally sanctioned suppression techniques]. Stockholm: Makalösa Föräldrar.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. R. (2014). Beyond the existence proof: Ontological conditions, epistemological implications and in-depth interviews research. Quality & Quantity, 48(1), 387–408. doi: 10.1007/s11135-012-9775-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclure, J. (2003). The politics of recognition at an impasse? Identity politics and democratic citizenship. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 3–21. doi: 10.1017/S0008423903778500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. (2011). Social research – issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2008a). Against recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNay, L. (2008b). The trouble with recognition: Subjectivity, suffering, and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(3), 271–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas, R. (2005). Administrating poverty: Studies of intake organisation and social assistance in Sweden. Stockholm: Institutionen för Socialt arbete.
   Google Scholar
• Moffatt, K. (1999). Surveillance and government of the welfare recipient. In A. S. Chambon, A. Irving, & L. Epstein (Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 219–247). New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Näsman, E. (2012). Financial oppression and neglect of children. Paper presented at Nordiska sociologikongressen, Reykavik, Island.
   Google Scholar
• Näsman, E., & Fernqvist, S. (2015). Ekonomiskt våld [Economic abuse]. In M. Eriksson, Å. Källström Carter & E. Näsman. (Eds.), Barns röster om våld. Att lyssna, tolka och förstå [Children’s voices about violence. To listen, interpret and understand], (pp. 149–167). Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Näsman, E., Ponton von Gerber, C., & Fernqvist, S. (2012). Barnfattigdom. Om bemötande och metoder ur ett barnperspektiv [Child poverty. About approach and methods from a child’s perspective]. Stockholm: Gothia förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, T. (2006). Domestic violence in the United States and Sweden: A welfare state typology comparison within a power resources framework. Women’ Studies International Forum, 26, 96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L. (2004). Battered and on welfare: The experience of women with the family violence option. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, XXXI(2), 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L., Plummer, S.-B., McMahon, S., Murshid, N. S., & Kim, M. S. (2012). Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(3), 411–430. doi: 10.1177/0886260511421669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvin, D. M. (2007). At the crossroads and in the crosshairs: Social welfare policy and low-income women’s vulnerability to domestic violence. Social Problems, 54(2), 188–210. doi: 10.1525/sp.2007.54.2.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, A. R. (2008). Welfare indignities: Homeless women, domestic violence, and welfare reform in San Francisco. Gender Issues, 25(3), 193–20.9 doi: 10.1007/s12147-008-9061-9
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. K., & Schnabel, M. (2006). Organizing for economic empowerment of battered women: Women’s savings accounts. Journal of Community Practice, 14(3), 47–68. doi: 10.1300/J125v14n03_04
   Google Scholar
• SCB (2014). Statistics Sweden, http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Statistik-efter-amne/Arbetsmarknad/Arbetskraftsundersokningar/Arbetskraftsundersokningarna-AKU/2016-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Social Services Act. 2001. Social Services Act 2001:453. Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2010). Examining the intersections of race, class, and gender – an introduction. In N. J. Sokoloff & C. Pratt (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on Race (pp. 1–15). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou, A. M., Postmus, J. L., & McMahon, S. (2013). Measuring abusive behaviors. Is economic abuse a unique form of abuse? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(16), 3186–3204. doi: 10.1177/0886260513496904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorén, K. H. (2008). Activation policy in action: a street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish welfare state (PhD thesis). Växjö University Press, Växjö.
   Google Scholar
• Trygged, S., Hedlund, E., & Kåreholt, I. (2013). Våldsutsatta kvinnor drabbas av långsiktiga negativa ekonomiska konsekvenser [Abused women suffer long-term negative economic consequences]. Socialmedicinsk tidskrift, 90(4), 604–612.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmestig, R., & Marston, G. (2015). Street-level perceptions of procedural rights for young unemployed people – a comparative study between Sweden and Australia. Social Policy & Administration, 49(3), 394–411. doi: 10.1111/spol.12085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2005). Vad är god forskningssed? [What is good research practice?]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt-Höjer, M. (2002). Rädslans politik. Våld och sexualitet i den svenska demokratin [The politics of fear. Violence and sexuality in the Swedish democracy]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar