841
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Child welfare workers’ experiences of obstacles in care order preparation: a cross-country comparison

Barrierer i forberedelse av sak om omsorgsovertakelse: en sammenligning av barnevernsansattes erfaringer i fire landFootnote

&

References

  • Archard, D. (Ed.). (2004). Children: Rights and childhood (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Ari, M., & Sipal, R. (2009). Factors affecting job satisfaction of Turkish special education professionals: Predictors of turnover. European Journal of Social Work, 12 (4), 47–63.
  • Beckett, C., Mckeigue, B., & Taylor, H. (2007). Coming to conclusions: Social workers’ perceptions of the decision-making process in care proceedings. Senior Lecturers, Institute of Health and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
  • Benbenishty, R., Osmo, R., & Gold, N. (2003). Rationales provided for risk assessments and for recommended interventions in child protection: A comparison between Canadian and Israeli professionals. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 137–155. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/33.2.137
  • Berrick, J. D., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2016). Time, institutional support and quality of decision making in child protection: A cross-country analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 25 (4), 366–378. doi: 10.1080/23303131.2016.1159637
  • Berrick, J. D., Peckover, S., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis. Journal of European Social Policy, 1–13. doi: 10.1177/0958928715594540
  • Bolton, A., & Lennings, C. (2010). Clinical opinions of structured risk assessments for forensic child protection: The development of a clinically relevant device. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1300–10. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.022
  • Britner, P. A., & Mossler, D. G. (2002). Professionals’ decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 317–332. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00311-3
  • Broadhurst, K. (2016). State intervention in family life in England: Safeguarding children through care proceedings and adoption. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: A cross country analysis of decision making systems (pp. 174–196). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Burns, K. (2011). ‘Career preference’, ‘transients’ and `converts’: A study of social workers’ retention in child protection and welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 520–538. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq135
  • Burns, K. (2012). Strengthening the retention of child protection workers: Career preferences, exchange relationships and employment mobility. Bremen: EHV Academic Press.
  • Burns, K., & Christie, A. (2013). ‘Employment mobility or turnover? An analysis of child welfare and protection employee retention. Children & Youth Services Review, 35, 340–346. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.014
  • Burns, K., Pösö, T. & Skivenes M. (Eds.). (2016). Child welfare removals by the state: A cross country analysis of decision making systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cheng, T., Mauno, S., & Lee, C. (2014). Do job control, support, and optimism help job insecure employees? A three-wave study of buffering effects on job satisfaction, vigor and work-family enrichment. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1269–1291. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0467-8
  • Dickens, J. (2006). Care, control and change in child care proceedings: Dilemmas for social workers, managers and lawyers. Child & Family Social Work, 11, 23–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00386.x
  • Duffy, J., & Collins, M. E. (2010). Macro impacts on case worker decision-making in child welfare: A cross-national comparison. European Journal of Social Work, 13(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1080/13691450903135618
  • Ellet, A. J., Ellis, J.I., Westbrook, T. M. & Dews D. (2007). A qualitative study of 369 child welfare professionals’ perspectives about factors contributing to employee retention and turnover. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(2), 264–281. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.005
  • Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. J. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 503–514. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.503
  • Gilbert, N., Parton, N. & Skivenes M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Healy, K., & Oltedal, S. (2010). ‘An institutional comparison of child protection systems in Australia and Norway focused on workforce retention. Journal of Social Policy, 39, 255–274. doi:10.1017/S004727940999047
  • Heywood, A. (2004). Political theory – an introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jacobsen, D. I., & Thorsvik, J. (2013). Hvordan organisasjoner fungerer (4. utg.). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Juhasz, I., & Skivenes, M. (2016). The population's confidence in the child protection system – a survey study of England, Finland, Norway and the United States (California). Social Policy & Administration, early view. doi: 10.1111/spol.12226
  • Koch, J., Eisend, M., & Petermann, A. (2009). Path dependence in decision-making processes: Exploring the impact of complexity under increasing returns. BuR: Business Research Journal, 2s 67–84.
  • Križ, K., Free, J., & Kuehl, G. (2016). How children are removed from home in the United States. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: A cross country analysis of decision making systems (pp. 197–222). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Križ, K., & Skivenes, M. (2014). Street-level policy aims of child welfare workers in England, Norway and the United States: An exploratory study. Children & Youth Service Review, 40, 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.014
  • Mänttäri-van der Kuip, M. (2015). Work-Related well-being among Finnish frontline social workers in an age of austerity. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
  • Molander, A., Grimen, H., & Eriksen, E. O. (2012). Professional discretion and accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29, 214–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x
  • Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection (Final report – A child-centered system). Retrieved March, 2015, from http://www.gov.uk./goverment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175391/Munro-Review.pdf
  • Parton, N., & Berridge, D. (2011). Child protection in England. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems: International trends and orientations (pp. 60–85). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pösö, T. (2011). Combatting child abuse in Finland: From family to child-centered orientation. In N. Gilbert, N. Parton & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child protection systems: International trends and orientations (pp. 112–130). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pösö, T., Skivenes, M., & Hestbæk, A.-D. (2013). Child protection systems in the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian welfare states – time for a child centric approach? European Journal of Social Work, 17, 475–490. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2013.829802
  • Rice, D. (2013). Street-level bureaucrats and the welfare state: Toward a micro-institutionalist theory of policy implementation. Administration & Society, 45, 1048–1062. doi: 10.1177/0095399712451895
  • Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Russell, M., & Hornby, H. (1987). 1987 national study of public child welfare job requirements. Portland, ME: National Child Welfare Resource Center for Management and Administration.
  • Samantrai, K. (1992). Factors in the decision to leave: Retaining social workers with MSWs in public child welfare. Social Work, 37, 454–458. doi: 10.1093/sw/37.5.454
  • Skivenes, M., & Stenberg, H. (2013). Risk assessment and domestic violence – how do child welfare workers in three countries assess and substantiate the risk level of a 5-year-old girl? Child & Family Social Work. doi: 10.1111/cfs.12092
  • Skivenes, M., & Tefre, Ø. (2012). Adoption in the child welfare system – a cross country analysis of child workers’ recommendations for or against adoption. Children & Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2220–2228. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.013
  • Soydan, H. (1996). Using the vignette method in cross-cultural comparisons. In L. Hantrais & S. Mangen (Eds.), Cross-national research methods in the social sciences (pp. 120–128). London: Pinter.
  • Steen, J. A. (2010). An exploratory study of the relationship between child protection system stressors and case outputs. Administration in Social Work, 35, 46–59. doi: 10.1080/03643107.2011.533620
  • Tietjen, M. A., & Myers, R. M. (1998). Motivation and job satisfaction. Management Decision, 36, 226–231. doi: 10.1108/00251749810211027
  • Tham, P. (2007). Why are they leaving? Factors affecting intention to leave among social workers in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 1225–46. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl054
  • Thompson, K. (2013). Multi-agency information practices in children's services: The metaphorical ‘jigsaw’ and professionals quest for a ‘full’ picture. Child & Family Social Work, 18, 189–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00821.x
  • Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.