References

• Annison, J., Eadie, T., & Knight, C. (2008). People first: Probation officer perspectives on probation work. Probation Journal, 55(3), 259–272. doi: 10.1177/0264550508095122
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, J., & Smith, K. (2009). Managing restructured social services: Expanding the social? British Journal of Social Work, 40(2), 530–547. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, A. (2011a). The transformation of offender rehabilitation? (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, A. (2011b). Organisational change, increasing managerialism and social work values in the Belgian Houses of Justice, Department of Offender Guidance. European Journal of Probation, 3(3), 15–30. doi: 10.1177/206622031100300302
   Google Scholar
• Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2002). Het forensisch welzijnswerk en het concept van sociale re-integratie [ Forensic social work and the concept of social reintegration]. In M. Bouverne-De Bie, K. Kloek, W. Meyvis, R. Roose, & J. Vanacker (red.), Handboek Forensisch Welzijnswerk [ Handbook on forensic social work] (pp. 351–380). Gent: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2009). Social work and the shift from ‘welfare’ to justice. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 113–127. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canton, R. (2006). Penal policy transfer: A case study from Ukraine. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(5), 502–520. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2006.00440.x
   Google Scholar
• Canton, R. (2009). Taking probation abroad. European Journal of Probation, 1(1), 66–78. doi: 10.1177/206622030900100105
   Google Scholar
• Canton, R. (2011). Probation: Working with offenders. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 509–529. doi: 10.1177/1462474511422172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croall, H., Mooney, G., & Munro, M. (Eds.). (2010). Criminal justice in Scotland. Abingdon: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Deering, J. (2011). Probation practice and the new penology: Practitioner reflections. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate General of the Houses of Justice. (2014). Vision statement offender guidance-2010. In Activiteitenrapport 2013 [ Activity Report 2013] (pp. 6–7). Brussel: Federale Overheidsdienst Justitie.
   Google Scholar
• Dunphy, D., & Stace, D. (1993). The strategic management of corporate change. Human Relations, 46(8), 905–920. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnescu, I. (2011). Pains of probation: Effective practice and human rights. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(4), 530–545. doi: 10.1177/0306624X10369489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnescu, I., & Haines, K. (2012). Probation in Romania. Archaeology of a partnership. British Journal of Criminology, 52(5), 889–907. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azs026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1994). Actuarial justice: The emerging new criminal law. In D. Nelken (Ed.), The futures of criminology (pp. 172–201). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2011). Child protection practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (1997). Probation and the reconfiguration of crime control. In R. Burnett (Ed.), The probation service: Responding to change [ Proceedings of the probation studies unit first colloquium] (pp. 2–10). Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2000). The culture of high crime societies. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 347–375. doi: 10.1093/bjc/40.3.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2015a). Confronting neoliberal penality: Placing prison reform and critical criminology at the core of social work’s social justice agenda. Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1177/1468017314565753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2015b). Active equality: Jacques Rancière’s contribution to social work’s ‘new left’. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, S., & McNeill, F. (2014). The quality of probation supervision: Comparing practitioner accounts in England and Scotland. European Journal of Probation, 6(2), 147–168. doi: 10.1177/2066220314542942
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S., & McNeill, F. (2015). What matters in practice? Understanding ‘quality’ in the routine supervision of offenders in Scotland. British Journal of Social Work, 45(7), 1985–2002. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Webb, S. (2009). The return of the political in social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(1), 111–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00626.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2005). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject. Punishment and Society, 7(1), 29–51. doi: 10.1177/1462474505048132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, E. (2003). New managerialism, social service departments and social work practice today. Practice, 15(2), 29–44. doi: 10.1080/09503150308416917
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, E., Berg, E., Barry, J., & Chandler, J. (2013). Neoliberalism, managerialism and the reconfiguring of social work in Sweden and the United Kingdom. Organization, 20(4), 534–550. doi: 10.1177/1350508412448222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, C. G. (2000). From social Darwinism to self-organization: Implications for social change theory. Social Service Review, 74, 533–559. doi: 10.1086/516424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonckheere, A. (2009, Novembre). L’informatisation des maisons de justice : une réponse à l’enjeu d’uniformisation du travail social. In B. Bernard (Ed.), Le management des organisations judiciaires. Les dossiers de performance publique (pp. 137–152). Bruxelles: Larcier.
   Google Scholar
• Jonckheere, A. (2011). De invloed van management en informatisering op het werk van de justitieassistenten. Welke kwaliteit van de interventie en respect voor de organisatie [The impact of management and information technology on the work of justice assistants]. In 10 Jaar Justitiehuizen. Balans en Perspectieven, Congresverslagboek, Colloquium 2 en 3 december 2009, Brussel, FOD Justitie, 2011, 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Jonckheere, A. (2012). Des assistants de justice aux prises avec SIPAR: un regard sur le management des maisons de justice [The justice assistants struggling with SIPAR : An insight perspective on the management of the Houses of Justice]. (PhD Thesis). Ecole de Criminologie, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, D. (2009). Pénalité, management, innovation. Travaux de la faculté de droit, n° 29. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, F., & Waller, M. R. (2015). Taxing the poor: Incarceration, poverty governance, and the seizure of family resources. Perspectives on Politics, 13(3), 638–656. doi: 10.1017/S153759271500122X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, G., Burke, L., & Taylor, S. (2006). The worst tax form you’ve ever seen? Probation officers’ views about OASys. Probation Journal, 53(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1177/0264550506060861
   Google Scholar
• Mawby, R., & Worrall, A. (2013). Doing probation work: Identity in a criminal justice occupation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McAra, L. (2008). Crime, criminal justice and criminology in Scotland. European Journal of Criminology, 5(4), 481–504. doi: 10.1177/1477370808095127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. (2006). Challenging social work: The institutional context of practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., Burns, N., Halliday, S., Hutton, N., & Tata, C. (2009). Risk, responsibility and reconfiguration: Penal adaptation and misadaptation. Punishment and Society, 11(4), 419–142. doi: 10.1177/1462474509341153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, M. (2014). Modern social work theory. New York: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J. (2012). The place of social work in sustainable development: Towards ecosocial practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(3), 287–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00856.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. (2009). Penal populism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P., & Vanstone, M. (2010). Skills and strategies in probation supervision: The Jersey study. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 113–129). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P., & Vanstone, M. (2014). The impact of skills in probation work: A reconviction study. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(2), 235–249. doi: 10.1177/1748895813494869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (1997). Straight Thinking On Probation (STOP): The Mid Glamorgan experiment (Probation Studies Unit Report No. 4). Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ricks, E. P., & Louden, J. E. (2015). The relationship between officer orientation and supervision strategies in community corrections. Law and Human Behavior, 39(2), 130–141. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. (2002). Exploring risk management in the probation service: Contemporary developments in England and Wales. Punishment and Society, 4(1), 5–25. doi: 10.1177/14624740222228446
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G. (2003). Technicality and indeterminacy in probation practice: A case study. British Journal of Social Work, 33(5), 593–610. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/33.5.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., Priede, C., Farrall, S., Shapland, J., & McNeill, F. (2014). Understanding ‘quality’ in probation practice: Rontline perspectives in England & Wales. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(2), 123–142. doi: 10.1177/1748895813483763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2012). Irony and social work: In search of the happy Sisyphus. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1592–1607. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwudike, P. (2011). Mapping the interface between contemporary risk-focused policy and frontline enforcement practice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11(3), 242–258. doi: 10.1177/1748895811401975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterval, H. (2001). Le travail de l’assistant de justice: une approche contextuelle et relationnelle. Ministère de la Justice, Direction Générale de l’Organisation Judiciaire - Service des Maisons de Justice (Janvier 2001) (unpublished report). Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (2013). The construction and stewardship of responsible yet precarious subjects: Punitive ideology, rehabilitation, and ‘tough love’ among parole personnel. Punishment and Society, 15(3), 219–242. doi: 10.1177/1462474513481720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitman, J. (2003). Harsh justice: Criminal punishment and the widening divide between America and Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar