Decision-making about the adoption of information technology in social welfare agencies: some key considerations

References

• Aas, K. F. (2004). From narrative to database: Technological change and penal culture. Punishment and Society, 6, 379–393. doi: 10.1177/1462474504046119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APPGSW. (2013, December 3). Inquiry into the state of social work report . All party parliamentary group on social work. London: British Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., Grant, D., & Wailes, N. (2006). ICT and organisational change: Introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 6–22. doi: 10.1177/0021886305285299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., Roose, R., Bouverne-De-Brie, M., & De Schryver, M. (2011). Data recording and social work: From the relational to the social. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1372–1382. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Bijan, A. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonard, B. A. Lardi, & J. Kalinkos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (Chap. 12, pp. 237–258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, D. (2006). Examination of the child protective services decision-making context with implications for decision support system design. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(4), 117–134. doi: 10.1300/J079v32n04_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, D. (2010). Homeless management information system customization intervention. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 20(2), 255–271. doi: 10.1080/10911350903269922
   Google Scholar
• French, R., & Stillman, L. (2014). The Informationalisation of the Australian community sector. Social Policy and Society, 13(4), 623–634. doi: 10.1017/S1474746414000098
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Retrieved from webmail.csic.umd.edu/class/spring2002/cmsc434-0201/p79-gaver.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009). The use of assessment tools in child protection: An ethnomethodological study (PhD thesis). University of Melbourne. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.1436.8483. Retrieved from http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/4337
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014a). Repositioning electronic information systems in human services organisations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(2), 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014b). Electronic information systems and social work: Who are we designing for? Practice: Social Work in Action, 20(5), 313–326. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2014.958454
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015a). Electronic information systems and human services organisations: Avoiding the pitfalls of participatory design. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 651–666. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015b). Electronic information systems in human service organisations: The what, who, why and how of information. British Journal of Social Work, 45(5), 1598–1613. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015c). Implementing electronic information systems in human service organizations: The challenge of categorization. Practice: Social Work in Action, 27(3), 163–175. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2015.1014334
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2015d). Electronic information systems and human service organizations: The unanticipated consequences of organizational change. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(2), 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016a). The use of electronic information systems to guide practice in social welfare agencies: The perspectives of practitioners as end users. Practice: Social Work in Action, 28(5), 357–352. doi: 10.1080/09503153.2015.1135895
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2016b). Electronic information systems and human service organisations: The needs of managers. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., & Vakkari, P. (2013). “I did it my way”: Social workers as secondary designers of a client information system. Information Processing and Management, 49, 380–391. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introna, L. D. (2007). Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 11–25. doi: 10.1007/s10676-006-9133-z
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, K. (2007). A systems approach to purchasing and implementing new technology. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 31, 27–32. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200701000-00009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93. doi: 10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughton, T. (2010, July 22). Decommissioning statement to parliament. Retrieved June 6, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/search?q=ContactPoint
   Google Scholar
• MAV. (2015). Patchwork. Municipal Association of Victoria. Retrieved May 11, 2015, from http://www.mav.asn.au/policy-services/social-community/children-families/pages/patchwork.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. (2012). Final report – Patchwork evaluation (Internal report). London: FutureGov.
   Google Scholar
• Mildon, R., & Shlonsky, A. (2011). Bridge over troubled water: Using implementation science to facilitate effective services in child welfare. Child Abuse and Neglect, 35(9), 753–756. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child centred system. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2006). The other welfare state: Non-government agencies and the mixed economy of welfare in Australia. History Australia, 3(2), 44.1–44.15. doi: 10.2104/ha060044
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38, 253–269. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckover, S., White, S., & Hall, C. (2008). Making and managing electronic children: E-assessment in child welfare. Information, Communication and Society, 11(3), 375–394. doi: 10.1080/13691180802025574
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse, A., Hall, C., Peckover, S., & White, S. (2009). A tale of two CAFS: The impact of the electronic common assessment framework. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 599–612. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasanen, J. (2012). Accounting for IT-based use of information in emergency social work encounters. Nordic Social Work Research, 2(1), 21–37. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2012.667249
   Google Scholar
• Saario, S., & Stepney, P. (2009). Managerial audit and community mental health: A study of rationalising practices in Finnish psychiatric outpatient clinics. European Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 41–56. doi: 10.1080/13691450802221030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scannapieco, M., & Iannone, M. (2014). Native American Indian child welfare system change: Virtual implementation of a data system based on practice models. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(3), 220–235. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2014.937551
   Google Scholar
• Setterstrom, A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2013). Bases of intra-organisational power: An analysis of the information technology department. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 16(2), 88–102.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., … Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the integrated children’s system. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 613–626. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcp040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trkman, P. (2010). The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30(2), 125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M., Moore, R. S., Bekkering, E., & Johnston, A. C. (2009). Analysis of systems development project risks: An integrative framework. Advances in Information Systems, 40(2), 8–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D. (2011). Managers as designers in the public services: Beyond technomagic. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., & White, S. (2014). Beyond bureaucracy: Emerging trends in social care informatics. Health Informatics Journal, 20(3), 213–219. doi: 10.1177/1460458213487535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., Peckover, S., Hall, C., & Pithouse, A. (2009). Whither practice-near research in the modernization programme? Policy blunders in children’s services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(4), 401–411. doi: 10.1080/02650530903374945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood. (2008, November). Report of the special commission of inquiry into child protection services in New South Wales. Sydney: Hon James Wood, AO, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar