References

• Argyris, C., & Shon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2000). Nicomachean ethics. R. Crisp (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balsells, M. A., Pastor, C., Molina, M. C., Fuentes-Peláez, N., Vaquero, E., & Mundet, A. (2013). Child welfare and successful reunification: Understanding of the family difficulties during the socio-educative process. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 42, 228–247. Retrieved from http://www.rcis.ro/index.php
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, J. L., Bledsoe, S. E., & Mullen, E. J. (2009). The cycle of evidence based practice. In H. U. Otto, A. Polutta, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Evidence based practice – modernising the knowledge base of social work? (pp. 21–29). Leverkusen Oplade: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bernfeld, G. A. (2001). The struggle for treatment integrity in a ‘dis-integrated’ service delivery system. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 167–188). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work : Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B., & Moren, S. (2010). Explaining social work practice – the CAIMeR theory. Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 98–119. doi:10.1177/1468017309350661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, J. S. (2012). Shaping a science of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(5), 455–464. doi:10.1177/1049731512441263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, J. S. (2014). A science of social work, and social work as an integrative scientific discipline: Have we gone too far, or not far enough? Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 517–523. doi:0.1177/1049731513511994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisolara, S., Seigart, D., & SenGupta, S. (2014). Feminist evaluation and research: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making humans being human. Bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bunting, L. (2004). Parenting programmes: The best available evidence. Child Care in Practice, 10(4), 327–343. doi:10.1080/1357527042000285510
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409–429. doi:10.1037/h0027982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. Education, knowledge and action research. Lewes: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberland, C., & Dufour, S. (2004). The effectiveness of selected interventions for previous maltreatment: Enhancing the well-being of children who live at home. Child and Family Social Work, 9, 39–56. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00302.x
   Google Scholar
• Clapton, G., Cree, V. E., Allan, M., Edwards, R., Forbes, R., Irwin, M., … Perry, R. (2008). Ideas in action thinking ‘outside the box’: A new approach to integration of learning for practice. Social Work Education, 27(3), 334–340. doi:10.1080/02615470701379826
   Google Scholar
• Coady, N., Hoy, S. L., & Cameron, G. (2013). Fathers’ experiences with child welfare services. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00842.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, A. T., Preskill, H., & Tzavaras, T. (2003). An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2003, 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2006). Policy to support positive parenting, commission recommendation of 13.12.2006. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d6dda
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L., Ambron, S., Dornbusch, S., Hess, R., Hornik, R., Phillips, D., … Weiner, S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (1969). Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry in education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dagenais, C., Begin, J., Bouchard, C., & Forti, D. (2004). Impact of intensive family support programs: A synthesis of evaluation studies. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 249–263. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1929). The sources of science of education. New York, NY: Livering Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Driessens, K., Saurama, E., & Fargion, S. (2011). Research with social workers to improve their social interventions research with social workers to improve their social interventions. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 71–88. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.516629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbrill, G. C. (2006). Parental experience of child protection intervention: A qualitative study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Investing in children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage, commission recommendation of 20.2.2013. Brussels: Author. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/c_2013_778_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Euser, S., Alink, L. R. A., Stoltenborgh, M., & Bakermans-kranenburg, M. J. (2015). A gloomy picture : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reveals disappointing effectiveness of programs aiming at preventing child maltreatment. BMC Public Health, 1068, 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2387-9
   Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2014). Synergies and tensions in child protection and parent support: Policy lines and practitioners cultures. Child and Family Social Work, 19, 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00877.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morri, S. K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection. Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2003). Outline of a critical best practice perspective on social work and social care. British Journal of Social Work, 33(8), 1005–1024. doi:10.1093/bjsw/33.8.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, E. (2009). Children’s wellbeing in care: Evidence from a longitudinal study of outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 1092–1100. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90055-8
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB.
   Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Components, 311712, 1–119. Retrieved from http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/PDF/nirnmonograph.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Gartlehner, G., Hansen, R. A., Nissman, D., Lohr, K. N., & Carey, T. S. (2006). Criteria for distinguishing effectiveness from efficacy trials in systematic reviews. Technical Review 12. Retrieved from www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/efftrials.html
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1997). Local knowledge. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gredig, D., & Sommerfeld, P. (2008). New proposals for generating and exploiting solution-oriented knowledge. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 292–300. doi:10.1177/1049731507302265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Y., & Lincoln, E. (1986). Research, evaluation, and policy analysis: Heuristics for disciplined inquiry. Review of Policy Research, 5(3), 546–565. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00429.x
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2000). Taking sides in social research: Essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2013). The myth of research based policy and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K., & Darlington, Y. (2009). Service user participation in diverse child protection contexts: Principles for practice. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 420–430. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and time. London: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2009). Pathologies of reasons. On the legacy of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, S. (2014). Meta-theoretical paradigms underpinning risk in child welfare: Towards a position of methodological pragmatism. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(1), 55–60. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, R. R. (2009). Are we subjugating the user of social work research to save the profession? In H. U. Otto, A. Polutta, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Evidence based practice – modernising the knowledge base of social work? (pp. 47–59). Leverkusen Oplade: Barbara Budrich Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The handbook of action research (pp. 91–102). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenihan, A. T. (2015). Institutionalising evidence-based policy: International insights into knowledge brokerage. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 10(2), 114–125. doi:10.1080/21582041.2015.1055297
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2012). Response: Hermeneutics and accountable practice: Lessons from the history of social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(5), 492–498. doi:10.1177/1049731512444167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2016). Reaching the person – social work research as professional responsibility. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1137870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, H. L., Wathen, N., Barlow, J., Fergusson, D. M., Leventhal, J. M., & Taussig, H. N. (2009). Interventions to prevent child maltreatment and associated impairment. The Lancet, 373(17), 250–266. doi:10.1016/S0140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. (1986). La methode. La Connaissance de la connaissance. Le Seuil: Nouvelle édition.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. (2014). Evidence-based knowledge in the context of social practice. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 42, 59–73. doi:10.1177/1403494813516714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, E. J. (2016). Reconsidering the ‘idea’ of evidence in evidence-based policy and practice. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 310–335. doi:10.1080/13691457.2015.1022716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Wesselink, A., & Colebatch, H. (2014). Evidence and meaning in policy making. Evidence & Policy, 10(2), 161–165. doi:10.1332/174426514X13990278142965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce, selected philosophical writings. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petr, C. G., & Walter, U. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: A critical reflection. European Journal of Social Work, 12(2), 221–232. doi:10.1080/13691450802567523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. (2000). The expanded social scientist’s bestiary. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (1981). Paul Ricoeur: Hermeneutircs and the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. (2014). Bridging the gap between research-supported interventions and everyday social work practice: A New approach. Social Work, 59, 223–230. doi:10.1093/sw/swu023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, J. (2012). Evidence and evaluation in policy making. London: Institute for Government. Retrieved from www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/ourpeople
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. R., Markie-Dadds, C. & Turner, K. (2003). Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the triple p-positive parenting program: A population approach to the promotion of parenting competence. Brisbane: The Parenting and Family Support Centre. Retrieved from http://www.expoo.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/artikelTripleP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Serbati, S. (2017). ‘You won't take away my children!’ families’ participation in child protection. Lessons since best practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbati, S., & Gioga, G. (2017). Building a successful care path in residential care: Findings from qualitative research with young people who have left residential care and their professionals. Child Care in Practice, 23(1), 34–48. doi:10.1080/13575279.2015.1126226
   Google Scholar
• Serbati, S., Gioga, G., & Milani, P. (2012). Évaluer pour mieux intervenir. Évaluer les résultats et les processus pour améliorer les pratiques d'intervention auprès des familles négligentes. Revue Internationale Enfances, Familles, Générations, 16, 74–94. Retrieved from http://efg.inrs.ca/index.php/EFG/article/view/167
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (1999). Qualitative evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2011). Evaluating in practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2012a). Practice and research. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2012b). The positive contributions of quantitative methodology to social work research: A view from the sidelines. Research on Social Work Practice, 22(2), 129–134. doi:10.1177/1049731511420171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2014). A science of social work? Response to John Brekke. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 524–526. doi:10.1177/1049731514543408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, I. (2016). Social work science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Holland, S. (2014). Doing qualitative research in social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., & Lunt, N. (2012). Constructing practitioner research. Social Work Research, 36(3), 197–208. doi:10.1093/swr/svs013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwandt, T. A. (2002). Evaluation practice reconsidered. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld, P. (2014). Social work as an action science: A perspective from Europe. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(5), 586–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulet, M. H. (2016). Le travail social, une activité d’auto-conception professionnelle en situation d’incertitude. Sociologies. Retrieved from https://sociologies.revues.org/5553#quotation
   Google Scholar
• Soulet, P. M. (2014). Analyse qualité oupratique qualité? Quand la qualité devient un enjeu de définitiondu travail social? Actualités Sociales, 51, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1990). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In L. Stanley (Ed.), Feminist praxis (pp. 20–60). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. New York, NY: Cluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Timms, N. (1972). ‘ … and Renoir and Matisse and … ’ inaugural lecture. Bradford: University of Bradford.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, D., & Taylor, J. (2014). Interventions in chronic and severe neglect: What works? Child Abuse Review, 23(4), 231–234. doi:10.1002/car.2351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L. (2011). Theorizing practice research in social work. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 15(1), 49–73. doi:10.1921/095352211X604318
   Google Scholar
• Wandersman, A. (2009). Four keys to success (theory, implementation, evaluation, and resource/system support): High hopes and challenges in participation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 3–21. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9212-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21–33. doi:10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80178-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar