1,023
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Human rights and social justice in social work education: a critical realist comparative study of England and Spain

Los derechos humanos y la justicia social en la formación en trabajo social: un estudio comparativo entre Inglaterra y España desde el realismo crítico

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bamford, T. (2015). A contemporary history of social work. Learning from the past. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Banks, S. (2006). Ethics and values in social work (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Barnes, M. (2011). Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(2), 153–167. doi: 10.1080/17496535.2010.484265
  • BASW. (2014). The code of ethics for social work: Statement of principles. Retrieved from http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf
  • BASW. (2015). BASW human rights policy. Kent: The British Association of Social Workers.
  • Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press.
  • Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.
  • Blaikie, N., & Priest, J. (2017). Social research: Paradigms in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (2005). Pensamiento y acción. 2ª edición. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Carey, M., & Foster, V. (2013). Social work, ideology, discourse and the limits of post-hegemony. Journal of Social Work, 13(3), 248–266. doi: 10.1177/1468017311412032
  • CGTS. (2009). Manifiesto Trabajo social ante la Crisis: Consejo General del Trabajo Social.
  • CGTS. (2012). Codigo deontologico del Trabajo Social. Retrieved from https://www.cgtrabajosocial.es/consejo/codigo_deontologico
  • CIS. (2015). 3050 Barómetro de Enero 2015.
  • Croisdale-Appleby, D. (2014). Re-visioning social work education. An independent review. London: Department of Health.
  • Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L., & Karlsson, J. C. (2002). Explaining society. Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.
  • De la Red, N., & Brezmes, M. (2009). Trabajo Social en España. In T. Fernández García & C. Alemán-Bracho (Eds.), Introducción al trabajo social (pp. 131–152). Madrid: Alianza.
  • De Vogli, R. (2013). Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. The Lancet, 382(9890), 391. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61662-1. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673613616621
  • Dominelli, L. (2004). Social work: Theory and practice for a changing profession. Oxford: Polity.
  • Dominelli, L. (2010). Social work in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Dominelli, L. (2012). Green social work: From environmental crises to environmental justice. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Dominelli, L., & Khan, P. (2000). The impact of globalization on social work in the UK. European Journal of Social Work, 3(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1080/714052817
  • Dustin, D. (2007). The McDonaldization of social work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • The Equality Trust. (2017). How has inequality changed? Development of UK Income Inequality. Retrieved from https://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/how-has-inequality-changed
  • Eroles, C. (1997). Derechos humanos: compromiso ético del trabajo social. In C. Eroles, N. Fóscolo, & M. C. G. d. Camín (Eds.), Los Derechos Humanos: Compromiso ético del Trabajo Social (pp. 15–64). Buenos Aires: Espacio Editorial.
  • Eurostat. (2013). People at risk of poverty or social exclusion by age and sex. Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_peps01&lang=en
  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis : The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
  • Ferguson, I. (2007). Increasing user choice or privatizing risk? The antinomies of personalization. British Journal of Social Work, 37(3), 387–403. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm016
  • Ferguson, I. (2008). Reclaiming social work: Challenging neo-liberalism and promoting social justice. London: Sage.
  • Ferguson, I. (2009). ‘Another social work is possible!’ Reclaiming the radical tradition. In V. Leskošek (Ed.), Theories and methods of social work: Exploring different perspectives (pp. 81–98). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Work.
  • Ferguson, I. (2012). Personalisation, social justice and social work: A reply to Simon Duffy. Journal of Social Work Practice, 26(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2011.623771
  • FOESSA. (2013). Desigualdad y Derechos Sociales. Análisis y Perspectivas 2013. Madrid: Foessa; Cáritas.
  • Foucault, M. (1990). The archeology of knowledge. London: Routeledge.
  • Garrett, P. M. (2010). Examining the ‘conservative revolution’: Neoliberalism and social work education. Social Work Education, 29(4), 340–355. doi: 10.1080/02615470903009015
  • Hall, S. (1977). The hinterland of science: Ideology and the ‘sociology of knowledge’. In C. f. C. C. Studies (Ed.), On ideology (pp. 6–15). London: Hutchinson.
  • Harris, J. (2014). (Against) neoliberal social work. Critical and Radical Social Work, 2(1), 7–22. doi: 10.1332/204986014X13912564145528
  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Higgins, M. (2015). The struggle for the soul of social work in England. Social Work Education, 34(1), 4–16. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2014.946898
  • Houston, S. (2010). Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 9(1), 73–91. doi: 10.1177/1473325009355622
  • Ife, J. (2008). Human rights and social work: Towards rights-based practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • IFSW, & IASSW. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work/
  • Ioakimidis, V., Cruz-Santos, C., & Martínez-Herrero, I. (2014). Reconceptualizing social work in times of crisis: An examination of the cases of Greece, Spain and Portugal. International Social Work, 57(4), 285–300. doi: 10.1177/0020872814524967
  • Jones, C. (2004). The neo-liberal assault: Voices from the front line of British state social work. In I. Ferguson, M. Lavalette, & B. Whitmore (Eds.), Globalisation, global justice and social work (pp. 97–108). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Jordan, B., & Drakeford, M. (2012). Social work and social policy under austerity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lavalette, M. (Ed.). (2011). Radical social work today. Social work at the crossroads. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Lima, A. I. (2012). Alliance for the defence of social services: Spanish network in defence of social rights and a public system of social services. In N. Hall (Ed.), Social work around the world V: Building the global agenda for social work. Nottingham: IFSW.
  • Lundy, C. (2011). Social work, social justice, and human rights: A structural approach to practice. North York: Toronto Univ Press.
  • McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2006). A critical realist rationale for using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(1), 66–78. doi: 10.1177/1744987106060192
  • Méndez-Bonito, P. (2005). The history of social work education in Spain: Does harmonisation make sense? Portularia, 5(1), 205–222.
  • Méndez-Fernández, A. B., Leal-Freire, B., Martínez-Rodríguez, M., & Salazar-Bernanrd, J. I. (2006). Aprehendiendo a respetar: La perspectiva de Derechos Humanos como elemento fundamental en la formación y práctica del trabajo social. Acciones e Investigaciones Sociales, 1, 460–487.
  • Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system. London: The Stationery Office.
  • Murray, C. R. G. (2017). Magna Carta’s tainted legacy: Historic justifications for a British bill of rights and the case against the human rights act. In F. Cowell (Ed.), The case against the 1998 human rights act: A critical assessment. London: Routledge.
  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ponnert, L., & Svensson, K. (2016). Standardisation—the end of professional discretion? European Journal of Social Work, 19(3-4), 586–599. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1074551
  • Sewpaul, V., & Jones, D. (2005). Global standards for the education and training of the social work profession. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14(3), 218–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00362.x
  • Shaw, I. (2003). Critical commentary. Cutting edge issues in social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 107–120. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/33.1.107
  • Sherwood, H. (2016). People of no religion outnumber Christians in England and Wales–study. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/23/no-religion-outnumber-christians-england-wales-study
  • Soydan, H. (2010). Politics and values in social work research. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social work research (pp. 131–148). London: Sage.
  • Tropman, J. E. (1986). The “catholic ethic” vs the “protestant ethic”: Catholic social service and the welfare state. Social Thought, 12, 13–22. doi: 10.1080/15426432.1986.10383545
  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Wronka, J., & Staub-Bernasconi, S. (2012). Human rights. In K. Lyons, T. Hokenstad, M. Pawar, N. Huegler, & N. Hall (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of international social work (pp. 70–84). London: SAGE.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.