References

• Altermark, N. (2018). Hur legitimeras socialpolitiska besparingar? Konstruktionen av personlig assistans som ett “kostnadsproblem”. [How is social political austerity legitimised? The Construction of Personal Assistance as a Cost Problem]. Socialvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 24(2), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. (2008). Personal assistance in Sweden and Norway: From Difference to Convergence? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 10(3), 179–190. doi: 10.1080/15017410802145300
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O., Bengtsson, H., & Bjelke, B. (2014). Personal assistance in a Scandinavian context: Similarities, differences and developmental traits. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16, 3. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2014.895413
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1989). Auschwitz och det moderna samhället. [Modernity and the Holocaust]. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfils, I., & Askheim, O. (2014). Empowerment and personal assistance – resistance, consumer choice, partnership or discipline? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16, 62–78. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2014.895414
   Google Scholar
• CRPD. (2006). UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
   Google Scholar
• Dowler, S., & Walls (2011). Personal assistance services in the workplace: A literature review. Disability and Health Journal, 4(4), 201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunér, A., & Olin, E. (2018). Personal assistance from family members as an unwanted situation, an optional solution or an additional good? The Swedish example. Disability & Society, 33(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1375900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egard, H. (2011). Personlig assistans i praktiken. Beredskap, initiativ och vänskaplighet. [Personal assistance in practice. Readiness, initiative and kindness] (42, Lund Dissertations In Social Work, 2011). Vol. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, L. (2014). Rätt, norm och tillämpning: En studie av normativa mönster vid beslut enligt LSS på tre arenor [Legal right, norm, and application. A study of normative patterns in decision-making process in three arenas under LSS] (Lund studies in sociology of law, 44). Lund: Department of Sociology of Law, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Giertz, L. (2012). Erkännande, makt och möten: En studie av inflytande och självbestämmande med LSS [Recognition, Relations and Power. A study of influence and Self-Determination in LSS] (Linnaeus University dissertations; 93). Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimen, H., & Molander, A. (2008). Profesjon og skjønn [profession and discretion]. In A. Molander, & L. I. Terum (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier. [profession studies] (pp. 179–195). Oslo: Universistetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Grönvik, L. (2007). Definitions of disability in social Science. Methodological perspectives (Diss.). Department of Social Science. Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Guldvik, I., Christensen, K., & Larsson, M. (2014). Towards solidarity: Working relations in personal assistance. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(S1), 48–61. doi: 10.1080/15017419.2014.897644
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, G. (2017). Regimes of austerity. Social Movement Studies, 16(1), 21–35. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2016.1252669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, L. (2018). Live life! young peoples’ experiences of living with personal assistance and social workers’ experiences of handling LSS assessments from a child perspective (Diss.). Karolinska institute.
   Google Scholar
• Järkestig Berggren, U. (2014). Building on users’ knowledge as a basis for professional expertise? An example from Swedish social care services. European Journal of Social Work, 18(5), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järkestig Berggren, U., Blomberg, S., & Petersson, J. (2010). Traits of a representative welfare state: The Swedish example. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(4), 402–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00700.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M. (2008). Att förverkliga rättigheter genom personlig assistans [To realize rights within the frame of personal assistance]. (Lund dissertations in social work, 32). Lund: Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren-Martenson, L. (2013). “Hip to be Crip?” about Crip Theory, Sexuality and people with intellectual disabilities. (report). Sexuality and Disability, 31(4), 413–424. doi: 10.1007/s11195-013-9287-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LSS proposition. (prop1992/93:15). About service and support for some disabled persons. Stockholm: The Swedish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, L. (2001). Medborgardemokratin och eliterna [citizenship democracy and the elites]. (Lund political studies, 117). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo-wilson, E., Montgomery, P., & Dennis, J. (2008). Personal assistance for adults (1964) with both physical and intellectual impairments. Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group, 3(2), CD006860.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. (2018). Statistik om insatser enligt lagen om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade 2017. [Statistics of the services in the LSS legislation] https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/20925/2018-4-9.pdf (retrieved 190404).
   Google Scholar
• Nirje, B., & Wallin, K. (2003). Normaliseringsprincipen. [The principle of normalisation]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (2010). Disability Studies, disabled people and the Struggle for inclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 547–560. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2010.500088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentaraki, M. (2018). Austerity common sense and contested understandings of the austerity measures within a leadership of a professional association of social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 21, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1412914
   Google Scholar
• Selander, V. (2015). Familjeliv med personlig assistans. [Family life with personal assistance]. Report in social work, no 148. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• SSIA. (2003). Vägledning 2003:6, version 23. Retrieved 181121, [Guidelines 2003:6, version 23]. https://www.forsakringskassan.se/wps/wcm/connect/70eaa1bf-90c0-4ee7-b750-05797f45f306/vagledning-2003-06.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=.
   Google Scholar
• SSIA. (2018). Statistics on personal assistance. Försäkringskassan. Retrieved 181002. https://www.forsakringskassan.se/statistik/funktions%C2%ADnedsattning/assistansersattning.
   Google Scholar
• Vahlne Westerhäll, L. (2007). Legitimitetsfrågor inom den offentliga försäkringen. [Issues of legitimacy within the public social insurance]. In L. Vahlne Westerhäll (Ed.), Legitimitetsfrågor inom socialrätten [Issues of legitimacy within social Law] (pp. 187–229). Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik.
   Google Scholar