References

• Abbott, A. (1988). Systems of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, NÅ, & Pors, J. G. (2016). Public management in transition. The orchestration of potentiality. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social inquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryderup, I., Høybye-Mortensen, M., Nissen, M. A., & Westersøe, P. (2012). Viden, politik og praksis [Knowledge, policy and practice]. FORSA information.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansk Socialrådgiverforening. (2018). Socialrådgiverenes psykiske arbejdsmiljø – stress, arbejdspres og muligheden for at levere kvalitet i arbejdet. [The psychological work environment of social workers – stress, workload and the possibility of providing quality in the work]. November 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallov, M., Nissen, M. A., Kjærulff, J., Ringø, P., & Birk, R. H. (2017). Proactive, ambivalent and defensive relations between social work and social policy: The shaping of productivity. In K. Høgsbro & I. Shaw (Eds.), Social work and research in advanced welfare states (pp. 159–174). Abingdon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flew, T. (2014). Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 122(1), 49–71. doi: 10.1177/0725513614535965
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, R. (2006). Nyliberalisme og samfunnsvitenskapene [Neoliberalism and social sciences]. Oslo: Oslo University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. F., & Rieper, O. (2010). The politics of evidence-based policy-making: The case of Denmark. German Policy Studies, 6(2), 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Harrikari, T., & Rauhala, P. (2019). Towards glocal social work in the era of compressed modernity. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2016). Performance information in human service organizations: Quality and usefulness. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 486–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali, M., & Jönsson, J. H. (2018). Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare states and social work. Current and future challenges. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kautto, M., Heikkilä, M., Hvinden, B., Marklund, S., & Plough, N. (2002). Nordic social policy. Changing welfare states. London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kommunernes Landsforening. (2006). Den modificerede BUM-model Nye udfordringer på social- og sundhedsområdet. [The modified Purchaser-Supplier model. New challenges in social welfare and public health]. Kommunernes Landsforening.
   Google Scholar
• Kommunernes Landsforening. (2015). De udsatte børn. Fremtiden er deres. [Vulnerable children. The future is theirs] Kommunernes Landsforening.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J. (2000). New public management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2004). Research as an element in social work’s ongoing search for identity. In R. Lovelock, K. Lyons, & J. Powell (Eds.), Reflecting on social work – discipline and profession (pp. 625–644). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2006). Perspectives on European social work: from the birth of the nation to the impact of globalization. Farmington Hills: B. Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, S. (2010). Tid – En social konstruksjon? [Time – A social construction?]. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, MØ, Iversen, K., & Andersen, V. N. (2016). Review af resultatbaseret styring. Resultatbaseret styring på grundskole-, beskæftigelses- og socialområdet. [Review of performance management. Performance management in schools, employment services and social services]. KORA.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. L. (2008). What is neoliberalism? Socio-Economic Review, 6, 703–731. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwn016
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. A. (2016). Den produktive kvinde. Kroppen, kærligheden og økonomien [The productive woman. The body, love and economy]. Nordiske Udkast, 43(1), 4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. A. (2017). The impact of neoliberalism through ideas of productivity – the case of child welfare in Denmark. In K. Høgsbro & I. Shaw (Eds.), Social work and research in advanced welfare states (pp. 61–73). Oxon, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. A. (2018). We need to focus on the resources: Struggling with neoliberal economic rationales in social work with children and families. In M. Fallov & C. Blad (Eds.), Social welfare responses in a neoliberal era. Policies, practices and social problems (pp. 19–136). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. A., Fallov, M., Ringø, P., Kjaerulff, J., & Birk, H. R. (2015). Det produktive menneske: om neoliberalisme, politiske ideer og socialt arbejde som forandringsagent’ [The productive human. On neoliberalism, political ideas and social work as an agent of change]. Social Kritik, 141, 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. A., Fallov, M. A., & Ringø, P. (2018). Menneskesyn i socialt arbejde. Om udviklingen af det produktive menneske [Views on human being in social work. On the development of the productive human being]. Copenhagen: Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & Kirk, S. (2010). The nature and purposes of social work. In I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, & R. Ruckdeshel (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social work research (pp. 23–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, O. K. (2011). Konkurrencestaten [The competition state]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2013). Alienation and acceleration. Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (2004). Det stille sporskifte i velfærdsstaten: en diskursteoretisk beslutningsprocesanalyse [The quiet turnout in the welfare state: A discourse theoretical decision process analysis]. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization. Volume II. The impermanent organisation. Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organisation Science, 16( 4, Frontiers of Organization Science Part 1 of 2), 409–421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar