References

• Almog-Bar, M., Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2015). Bringing public policy into policy practice. Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 390–408. doi: 10.1177/1468017314547304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernler, G., & Johnsson, L. (2001). Teori för psykosocialt arbete [Theory for psychosocial work], 3rd rev. ed. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Sporadic democracy: Education, democracy and the question of inclusion. In M. Katz, S. Verducci, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Education, democracy and the moral life (pp. 101–112). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2011, February). Learning in public places: Civic learning for the 21st century. Inaugural lecture on the occasion of the award of the international Francqui professorship to Prof. Dr. Gert Biesta, Ghent: Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B. (2004). Specialization in social work practice: Effects on interventions in the personal social services. Journal of Social Work, 4(1), 25–46. doi: 10.1177/1468017304042419
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, B. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. New York: Pearson Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K. (2018). Social work, poverty and parity of participation: A search for social justice. Ghent: Ghent University, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K., Roets, G., & Roose, R. (2018). Social work, poverty, and anti-poverty strategies: Creating cultural forums. British Journal of Social Work, 48(8), 2381–2399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, A. C. (2003). Beyond the medical model: A reconsideration of ‘feeblemindedness’, citizenship and eugenic restrictions. Disability & Society, 18(4), 411–430. doi: 10.1080/0968759032000080977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools, P., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2017). Samenwerken vanuit verschil: De meerwaarde van buurtwerk. Sociaal.Net, 7 maart 2017. Retrieved from http://sociaal.net/analyse-xl/samenwerken-vanuit-verschil/
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G. (2002). Poverty, social work and social justice. British Journal of Social Work, 32(6), 669–682. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/32.6.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., & Wainwright, S. (2005). Combating poverty and social exclusion: Implications for social work. Social Work Education, 24(3), 259–273. doi: 10.1080/02615470500050453
   Google Scholar
• De Bie, M., & Vandenbussche, J. (2017). 40 jaar OCMW-praktijk op de spanning tussen bijstand als sociaal beleidsinstrument en bijstand als sociaal grondrecht. In M. De Wilde, F. Vandenbroucke, B. Cantillon, & M. De Bie (Eds.), 40 jaar OCMW en bijstand (pp. 49–64). Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, J., & Roose, R. (2018). Social work as a policy actor: Understanding social policy as an open-ended democratic practice. European Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1462768
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, K. (2013). Disturbing pedagogies in special youth care. In G. Biesta, M. De Bie, & D. Wildemeersch (Eds.), Civic learning, democratic citizenship and the public sphere (pp. 167–180). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2010). Understanding human need. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, H. (2013). The translation of needs into rights: Reconceptualising social citizenship as a global phenomenon. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), S32–S49. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12032
   Google Scholar
• d’Hertoge, M., & Van Oyen, F. (2017). Politiserend werken: De kern van het jeugdwelzijnswerk. In I. Kastit, & F. Van Oyen (Eds.), Macht in vraag gesteld: Strategieën en werkvormen in het jeugdwelzijnswerk (pp. 19–27). Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, M. (1999). Social exclusion, inequality and social work. Social Policy and Administration, 33(3), 245–261. doi: 10.1111/1467-9515.00149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellem, K., Wilson, J., & Chui, W. H. (2012). Effective responses to offenders with intellectual disabilities: Generalist and specialist services working together. Australian Social Work, 65(3), 398–412. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.625433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. (2004). Working with key incidents. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 457–472). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2015). The ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of policy practice: An eight-country comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 1083–1101. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibens, S. (2013). Recht in het sociaal werk: Hoe sociaal werk tot zijn recht kan komen. Pow Alert, 39(1), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Webb, S. A. (2013). The new politics of social work. UK/US: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, K., & Thiersch, H. (2009). The concept of ‘lifeworld orientation’ for social work and social care. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(2), 131–146. doi: 10.1080/02650530902923643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, L. M. (2001). International social work: Professional action in an interdependent world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hokenstad, M. C., Khinduka, S. K., & Midgley, J. (Eds.). (1992). Profiles in international social work. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubeau, B. (1995). De doorwerking van de sociale grondrechten in de Belgische grondwet: Over de maximalisten en minimalisten. In J. Vranken, D. Geldof, & G. Van Menxel (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: Jaarboek 1995 (pp. 157–166). Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Hugman, R. (2013). Rights-based international social work practice. In M. Gray, & S. A. Webb (Eds.), The new politics of social work (pp. 159–173). UK/US: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ife, J. (2001). Human rights and social work: Towards rights-based practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2014). Global definition of social work. Retrieved from http://ifsw.org/get-involved/global-definition-of-social-work
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, B. S. (2014). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M., Weiss-Gal, I., & Monnickendam, M. (2009). Poverty-aware social work practice: A conceptual framework for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 225–243. doi: 10.5175/JSWE.2009.200600144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leskosek, V. (2017). New forms of surveillance in social work and social policy: Example of Slovenia. Ljetopis Socijalsnog Rada, 24(3), 399–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, T. (2013). The added value of analyzing participation in a capability perspective. In Society, Final conceptual report “inequality, disadvantage, social innovation and participation” (pp. 63–85).
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist perspectives. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (1998). Citizenship of the margins: Citizenship, social work and social action. European Journal of Social Work, 2(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1080/13691459808414719
   Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2004). Poverty. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2016). Rediscovering the social question. European Journal of Social Work, 19(1), 4–17. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2015.1082984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2017). European policy developments and their impact on social work. European Journal of Social Work, 20(1), 17–28. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1185707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘Heroic Agency’ in conceptualizing social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42(6), 1022–1038. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C., & Marston, G. (2005). Workfare as welfare: Governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state. Critical Social Policy, 25(3), 374–401. doi: 10.1177/0261018305054077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2004). Management in het publieke domein: Issues, instituties en instrumenten. Bussum: Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S. (2017). Sociaal werkers zitten waar het schuurt. In B. Van Bouchaute, & P. Cristiansen (Eds.), Politisering van/in het sociaal werk: Wat kan ‘aan politiek doen’ vandaag betekenen voor praktijken van sociaal werk? (pp. 13–15). Gent: Nevelland Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Perlinski, M., Blom, B., Moren, S., & Lundgren, M. (2010). The dialectics between specialization and integration: Politicians and managers’ views on forms of organization in the Swedish social services. Administration in Social Work, 35(1), 60–87. doi: 10.1080/03643107.2011.533624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, F. (2001). The politics of social work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, P. (2016). A specialist perspective on the value of generalist practice: A qualitative network analysis. Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 610–626. doi: 10.1177/1468017316644693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rank, M. R. (2005). One nation, underprivileged: Why American poverty affects us all. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reijnders, M., Steen, T., & Schalk, J. (2018). Services wanted? Understanding the non-take-up of social support at the local level. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1360–1374.
   Google Scholar
• Reynaert, D., Roose, R., & Hermans, K. (2018). Sociaal werk is mede-maker van mensenrechten. Sociaal.Net, 26 januari 2018. Retrieved from https://sociaal.net/analyse-xl/sociaal-werk-is-mede-maker-van-mensenrechten/
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Dean, H., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (in press). Disability rights and disability studies in social work: Uncovering different interpretations of rights and needs of people with learning disabilities in social work practice. In F. Kessl, W. Lorenz, & H.-U. Otto (Eds.), European social work: A compendium. New York: Barbara Budrich Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Roose, R., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2013). Researching child poverty: Towards a lifeworld orientation. Childhood (copenhagen, Denmark), 0(0), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R. (2006). De vraag naar profilering: Hulpverlening tussen begrenzing en ontgrenzing. Sociale Interventie, 15(4), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R. (2017). Sociaal werk moet de deur openhouden. In B. Van Bouchaute, & P. Cristiansen (Eds.), Politisering van/in het sociaal werk: Wat kan ‘aan politiek doen’ vandaag betekenen voor praktijken van sociaal werk? (pp. 41). Gent: Nevelland Graphics.
   Google Scholar
• Schiettecat, T., Roets, G., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2018). Hide and seek: Political agency of social workers in supporting families living in poverty. British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1874–1891. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Spierts, M. (2017). Pleidooi voor een democratisch sociaal werk – Marie Kamphuislezing 2017. Retrieved from http://www.mariekamphuisstichting.nl/index.asp?pagina=MKS%20Lezing#2017
   Google Scholar
• Van den Eeckhaut, G., & Wilms, L. (2016). Agogiek: Filosofische en agogische analyse en reflectie (unpublished course).
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (1998). Failing selectivity: On the extent and causes of non-take-up of social security benefits. In H.-J. Andres (Ed.), Empirical poverty research in a comparative perspective (pp. 101–132). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Van Regenmortel, T. (2012). Lexicon van empowerment: Taal voor professionals over samenredzaamheid, versterking en participatie. Maatwerk, 13(13), 15–18. doi: 10.1007/s12459-012-0032-6
   Google Scholar
• Warin, P. (2014). What is the non take-up of social benefits? Retrieved from https://booksandideas.net/What-is-the-Non-Take-up-of-Social.html
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I. (2017). Social workers’ policy engagement: A review of the literature. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26(3), 285–298. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wester, F. (1987). Strategies for qualitative research. Muiderberg: Couthinho.
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, S. L. (1998). Human rights and social work. Social Work, 43(3), 197–201. doi: 10.1093/sw/43.3.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zemni, S. (2013). Sociaal werk in tijden van superdiversiteit: Een test voor de democratie? Colloqium Sociaal Werk en Democratie, Universiteit Gent, 24–25 oktober 2013.
   Google Scholar