References

• Alba, R. D., Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., Marzan, J., & Zhang, W. (1999). Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation. American Sociological Review, 64, 446–460. doi: 10.2307/2657495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alinsky, S. (1946). Reveille for radicals. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2013). Telescopic urbanism and the poor. City, 17(4), 476–492. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2013.812350
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 137–161. doi: 10.1177/0263276414548490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaut, K., Karrebæk, M., & Spotti, M. (2016). Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, J., & Cloke, P. (2012). Faith-based organisations and exclusion in European cities. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benton-Short, L., & Price, M. (2008). Migrants to the metropolis: The rise of immigrant gateway cities, an introduction. In M. Price & L. Benton-Short (Eds.), Migrants to the metropolis: The rise of immigrant gateway cities (pp. 1–22). New York: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birk, T. (2017). Infrastructuring the social: Local community work, urban policy and marginalized residential areas in Denmark. Environment and Planning A, 49(4), 767–783. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16683187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2014). Infrastructures of superdiversity: Conviviality and language in an Antwerp neighborhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 431–451. doi: 10.1177/1367549413510421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transnational ties in migrant informal social support. International Sociology, 30(3), 250–268. doi: 10.1177/0268580915570508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., Özüekren, A. S., & Phillips, D. (2010). Linking integration and residential segregation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 169–186. doi: 10.1080/13691830903387238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boost, D., & Oosterlynck, S. (2019). “Soft” urban arrival infrastructures in the periphery of metropolitan areas: The role of social networks for Sub-Saharan newcomers in Aalst, Belgium. In B. Meeus, K. Arnaut, & B. van Heur (Eds.), Arrival infrastructures: Migration and urban social mobilities (pp. 153–178). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, E. W. (1925). The growth of the city: An introduction to a research project. In R. E. Park, E. W. Burgess, & R. D. McKenzie (Eds.), The city (pp. 47–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, F. (2011). Transnational mobilities and urban spatialities: Notes from the Asia-Pacific. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 316–335. doi: 10.1177/0309132511423126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahinden, J. (2016). A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(13), 2207–2225. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalakoglou, D. (2016). Infrastructural gap: Commons, state and anthropology. City, 20(6), 822–831. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1241524
   Google Scholar
• Darling, J. (2016). Privatising asylum: Neoliberalisation, depoliticisation and the governance of forced migration. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 230–243. doi: 10.1111/tran.12118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gendt, T. (2014). Turkije aan de Leie. 50 jaar migratie in Gent. (Turkey on the Leie. 50 years of migration in Ghent). Tielt: Lannoo.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, K. M., Tolbert IIC. M., Nucci, A., & Kawano, Y. (2007). Recent immigrant settlement in the nonmetropolitan United States: Evidence from internal census data. Rural Sociology, 72(4), 537–559. doi: 10.1526/003601107782638666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffuor, A., & Harris, A. (2013). Politics as a vocation: Prayer, civic engagement and the gendered re-enchantment of the city. Religion & Gender, 3(1), 22–41. doi: 10.1163/18785417-00301003
   Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, E. (2000). Changes in the geographic concentration and location of residence of immigrants. International Migration Review, 34(2), 489–510. doi: 10.1177/019791830003400206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman, R., Negi, N., & Salvador, R. (2010). An introduction to transnational social work. In N. Negi & R. Furman (Eds.), Transnational social work practice (pp. 3–19). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2009). Towards a comparative theory of locality in migration studies: Migrant incorporation and city scale. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 177–202. doi: 10.1080/13691830802586179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., & Çağlar, A. (2013). Locating migrant pathways of economic emplacement: Thinking beyond the ethnic lens. Ethnicities, 13(4), 494–514. doi: 10.1177/1468796813483733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2010). Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 1(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/17450100500489189
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P., & Petersen, K. (2011). Beyond welfare state models: Transnational historical perspectives on social policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kreichauf, R. (2018). From forced migration to forced arrival: The campization of refugee accommodation in European cities. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(1), 7. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0069-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–343. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareels, E. (2016). Des portes de la ville à la conquête des nations: Spiritualisation du local et du global chez les pentecôtistes brésiliens de Bruxelles. (City gateways to the conquest of nations: Spiritualization of the local and the global among the Brazilian Pentecostals of Brussels). Religiologiques, 33, 125–154.
   Google Scholar
• Maskens, M. (2008). Migration et pentecôtisme à Bruxelles: Expériences croisées. (Migration and Pentecostalism in Brussels: Combined experiences). Archives de Sciences Sociales Des Religions, 143, 49–68. doi: 10.4000/assr.16423
   Google Scholar
• Maskens, M. (2012). Spiritual geographies: Mobility of Pentecostal ministers and migratory “miracles” between Africa or Latin America and Europe. Brussels Studies, 58, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69(3), 315–350.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. (Ed.). (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, R. D. (1924). The ecological approach to the study of the human community. American Journal of Sociology, 30, 287–301. doi: 10.1086/213698
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, B. (2017). Challenging the figure of the ‘migrant entrepreneur’: Place-based solidarities in the Romanian arrival infrastructure in Brussels. In S. Oosterlynck, N. Schuermans, & M. Loopmans (Eds.), Place, diversity and solidarity (pp. 103–120). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, B. (2018). Platforms to stand on for a while. Re-imagining the city (Brussels) from an arrival infrastructure perspective. Paper presented at the Jahrestagung der ÖFEB-Sektion Sozialpädagogik 20./21. September 2018, Universität Salzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Meeus, B., van Heur, B., & Arnaut, K. (2019). Migration and the infrastructural politics of urban arrival. In B. Meeus, K. Arnaut, & B. van Heur (Eds.), Arrival infrastructures: Migration and urban social mobilities (pp. 1–32). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. (1976). Social work practice: A response to the urban crisis. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morokvasic, M. (2004). ‘Settled in mobility’: Engendering post-wall migration in Europe. Feminist Review, 77(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, D., Stephenson, N., & Tsianos, V. (2008). Escape routes. Control and subversion in the twenty-first century. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., Bradby, H., Knecht, M., Padilla, B., & Pemberton, S. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory & Health, 17(2), 231–252. doi: 10.1057/s41285-018-0075-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, G. (2011). Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, M., & Libal, K. (2018). Social work with migrants and refugees. Challenges, best practices, and future directions. Advances in Social Work, 18(3), i–x. doi: 10.18060/22600
   Google Scholar
• Raithelhuber, E., Sharma, N., & Schröer, W. (2018). The intersection of social protection and mobilities: A move towards a ‘practical Utopia’ research agenda. Mobilities, 13(5), 685–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righard, E., & Boccagni, P. (2015). Mapping the theoretical foundations of the social work - migration nexus. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13(3), 229–244. doi: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1035473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, D. (2011). Arrival city: How the largest migration in history is reshaping our world. London: Windmill books.
   Google Scholar
• Schapendonk, J., & Steel, G. (2014). Following migrant trajectories: The im/mobility of Sub-Saharan Africans en route to the European Union. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(2), 262–270. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2013.862135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillebeeckx, E., Oosterlynck, S., & De Decker, P. (2019). Migration and the resourceful neighborhood: Exploring localized resources in urban zones of transition. In B. Meeus, K. Arnaut, & B. van Heur (Eds.), Arrival infrastructures: Migration and urban social mobilities (pp. 131–152). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schrooten, M. (2012). Moving ethnography online: Researching Brazilian migrants’ online togetherness. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(10), 1794–1809. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2012.659271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrooten, M., Salazar, N. B., & Dias, G. (2016). Living in mobility: Trajectories of Brazilians in Belgium and the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1199–1215. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2015.1089160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrooten, M., Thys, R., & Debruyne, P. (Eds.). (2019). Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap. [Social work in the shadow. About informal actors in social work]. Brussel: Politeia.
   Google Scholar
• Schrooten, M., Withaeckx, S., Geldof, D., & Lavent, M. (2016). Transmigration: Social work in a world of superdiversity. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Schuermans, N., Schrooten, M., & De Backer, M. (2019). Informele en formele sociaalwerkpraktijken als aankomstinfrastructuren voor nieuwkomers. [Informal and formal social work practices as arrival infrastructures for newcomers]. In M. Schrooten, R. Thys, & P. Debruyne (Eds.), Sociaal schaduwwerk. Over informele spelers in het welzijnslandschap (pp. 147–158). Brussel: Politeia.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. (2005). The continuing mobility of migrants in Italy: Shifting between places and statuses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(4), 757–774. doi: 10.1080/13691830500109993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, J. (2014). Incremental infrastructures: Material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra. Urban Geography, 35(6), 788–804. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2014.933605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, A. (2004). People as infrastructure: Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, 16(3), 407–429. doi: 10.1215/08992363-16-3-407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simone, A. (2010). The social infrastructures of city life in contemporary Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways: The living cities census series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torpey, J. (1998). Coming and going: On the state monopolization of the legitimate “means of movement”. Sociological Theory, 16(3), 239–259. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törngren, S. A., Öberg, K., & Righard, E. (2018). The role of civil society in the integration of newly arrived refugees in Sweden. In A. Lāce (Ed.), Newcomer integration in Europe: Best practices and innovations since 2015 (pp. 13–24). Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Trovalla, U., & Trovalla, E. (2015). Infrastructure turned suprastructure: Unpredictable materialities and visions of a Nigerian nation. Journal of Material Culture, 20(1), 43–57. doi: 10.1177/1359183514560284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen, K. (2016). Social work and migration. Immigrant and refugee settlement and integration. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam, S., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2017). Migrants in the periphery: Migrant organisations and their networks. European Journal of Social Work, 20(6), 921–934. doi: 10.1080/13691457.2016.1202810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. (2012). Social consequences of residential segregation and mixed neighborhoods. In F. Clapham, W. Clark, & K. Gibb (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of housing studies (pp. 439–460). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. (2004). Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies, 8(3), 237–260. doi: 10.1080/1362102042000256989
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. (2016). Social work and the city. Urban themes in 21st-century social work. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review, 37(3), 576–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00151.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar