References

• Asakura, K., Todd, S., Eagle, B., & Morris, B. (2018). Strengthening the signature pedagogy of social work: Conceptualizing field coordination as a negotiated social work pedagogy. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 38(1), 151–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1436635
   Google Scholar
• Azaiza, F., Soffer, M., & Taubman, D. (2015). Social work eduvation in Israel. The Indian Journal of Social Work, 76(761), 75–94. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283306787_Social_Work_Education_in_Israel
   Google Scholar
• Boitel, C., & Fromm, L. (2014). Defining signature pedagogy in social work education: Learning theory and the learning contract. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2014.947161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. L. (2012). Cross-national qualitative research into the long-term care of older people: Some reflections on method and methodology. European Journal of Social Work, 14(4), 449–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.708903
   Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. (2006). Social theory’s methodological nationalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431006060460
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J., Gray, M., & Hetherington, T. (2006). An ‘ecospiritual’ perspective: Finally a place for indigenous approaches. British Journal of Social Work, 36(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dellgran, P., & Höjer, S. (2005). Privatisation as professionalisation? Attitudes, motives and achievements among Swedish social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 8(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369145042000331369
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205
   Google Scholar
• García-Moreno, C., & Anleu-Hernández, C. M. (2019). Social work in Spain: A new social and economic reality to develop in practical academic training. Social Work Education, 38(8), 996–1009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1611756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M., Bergentoft, H., & Selin, P. (2018). Teacher researchers creating communities of research practice by the use of a professional development approach. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teachers’ Professional Development, 22(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1385517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaipal, K., & Figg, C. (2010). Unpacking the “total PACKage”: emergent TPACK characteristics from a study of preservice teachers teaching with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 415–441.
   Google Scholar
• Kadlec, A. (2006). Reconstructing Dewey: The philosophy of critical pragmatism. Polity, 38(4), 519–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300067
   Google Scholar
• Larrison, T., & Korr, W. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2013.768102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, J. C. B. (2007). An international definition of social work for China. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2007.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers' collaborativeactivities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyter, S. (2013). Potential of field education as signature pedagogy: The field director role. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez Herrero, M., & Charnley, H. (2019). Human rights and social justice in social work education: A critical realist comparative study of England and Spain. European Journal of Social Work, 22(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motley, P., Chick, N., & Hipchen, E. (2017). A conversation about critique as a signature pedagogy in the arts and Humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 16(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022216652773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar, M., & Thomas, M. (2017). Social work education in Australia and the USA: Comparative perspectives and contemporary issues. Social Work Education, 36(6), 648–661. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1335699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, G. (2007). Higher education for social work in Sweden. Australian Social Work, 60(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070601166711
   Google Scholar
• Satka, M., & Karvinen, S. (1999). The contemporary reconstruction of Finnish social work expertise. European Journal of Social Work, 2(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691459908413811
   Google Scholar
• Scholzm, R., & Tietje, O. (2002). Types of case studies in embedded case studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1982). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sewpaul, V. (2006). The global-local dialectic: Challenges for African scholarship and social work in a post-colonialist world. British Journal of Social Work, 36(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, S. 2001. Social work education in Israel: Trends and issues. Social Work Education, 20(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470020028391
   Google Scholar
• Tham, P., & Lynch, D. (2019). ‘Lost in transition?’ – Newly educated social workers’ reflections on their first months in practice. European Journal of Social Work, 22(3), 400–411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1364701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicary, S., Cree, V. E., & Manthorpe, J. (2018). Social work education – A Local and global history. Practice, 30(4), 223–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2018.1483646
   Google Scholar
• Wakkary, R. (2007). A participatory design understanding of interaction design. Science of design workshop. CHI.
   Google Scholar
• Wallengren -Lynch, M., Hollertz, K., & Ryan Bengtsson, A. (2018). Applying a ‘signature pedagogy’ in the teaching of critical social work theory and practice. Social Work Education, 38(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1498474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, J., Bogo, M., & Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2010.200900043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, S., Shaw, I., Cauvain, S., Hardy, M., Kääräinen, A., Satka, M., & Yliruka, L. (2014). W(h)ither the academy? An exploration of the role of university social work in shaping the future of social work in Europe. European Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 627–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.912202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, M. (2019). Comparing ‘deep’ insider knowledge: Developing analytical strategies for cross-national qualitative studies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23, 241–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1669927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guideto managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar