References
- Ahgren, B., & Axelsson, R. (2011). A decade of integration and collaboration: The development of integrated health care in Sweden 2000–2010. International Journal of Integrated Care, 11(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.566
- Andersson, J., Ahgren, B., Bihari Axelsson, S., Eriksson, A., & Axelsson, R. (2011). Organizational approaches to collaboration in vocational rehabilitation – an international literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 11(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.670
- Arnstein, S. (2019). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
- Autunes, V., & Moriera, P. (2012). Approaches to developing integrated care in Europe: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management & Marketing in Health Care, 4(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/175330311X13016677137743
- Axelsson, R., & Bihari Axelsson, S. (2006). Integration and collaboration in public health – a conceptual framework. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 21(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.826
- Bee, P., Price, O., Baker, J., & Lovell, K. (2015). Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning. British Journal of Psychiatry, 207(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.152447
- Beresford, P. (2005). Social approaches to madness and distress – user perspectives and user knowledges. In J. Tew (Ed.), Social perspectives in mental health (pp. 32–52). Kingsley.
- Bergmark, Å, Germundsson, N., Lundström, T., & Stranz, H. (2017). Ringar på vattnet – om socialtjänstens individ- och familjeomsorg i samverkan [Ripples on the water – collaboration and the social service]. Socionomens Forskningssupplement, 41(1), 34–48.
- Bergmark, M., Bejerholm, U., Svensson, B., & Markström, U. (2018). Complex interventions and interorganisational relationships: Examining core implementation components of assertive community treatment. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(4), 11. 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3547
- Bjerkan, J., Vatne, S., & Hollingen, A. (2014). Web-based collaboration in individual care planning challenges the user and the provider roles – toward a power transition in caring relationships. Journal of Multidisciplinary Health Care, 7, 561–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S70470
- Bjørkquist, C., & Hansen, G. V. (2018). Reducing service barriers to people with dual diagnosis in Norway. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1561237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1561237
- Burns, T., Fioretti, A., Holloway, F., Malm, U., & Rössler, W. (2001). Case management and assertive community treatment in Europe. Psychiatric Services, 52(5), 631–636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.5.631
- Carpenter, J., Schneider, J., McNiven, F., Brandon, T., Stevens, R., & Wooff, D. (2004). Integration and targeting of community care for people with severe and enduring mental health problems: Users’ experiences of the care programme approach and care management. British Journal of Social Work, 34(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch040
- Drake, R. E., Essock, S. M., Shaner, A., Carey, K. B., Minkoff, K., Kola, L., Lynde, D., Osher, F. C., Clarke, R. E., & Richards, L. (2001). Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 469–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.469
- Ellis, K. A. (2009). Revisiting ‘street-level bureaucracy’ in post-managerialist welfare states. University of Bedfordshire.
- Governmental Proposition. (2008/09:193). Regeringens proposition – Vissa psykiatrifrågor m.m [The Swedish government’s proposition – certain questions concerning psychiatry etc.].
- Horsfall, J., Cleary, M., Hunt, G. E., & Walter, G. (2009). Psychosocial treatments for people with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders (double diagnosis): A review of empirical evidence. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220902724599
- Laitila, M., Nummelin, J., Kortteisto, T., & Pitkänen, A. (2018). Service users’ views regarding user involvement in mental health services: A qualitative study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 32(5), 695–701. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.03.009
- Langhammar, B., Madsen, V. H., Hellem, E., Bruusgaard, K. A., Alve, G., & Slettebö, Å. (2015). Working with individual plans. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2013.795912
- Lawrence, P. A., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Harvard University Press.
- Maruthappu, M., Hasan, A., & Zeltner, T. (2015). Enablers and barriers in implementing integrated care. Health Systems & Reform, 1(4), 250–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2015.1077301
- Matscheck, D., & Axelsson, R. (2012). Arenas for contact – a study of local collaboration in mental health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 16(2), 93–113.
- Matscheck, D., & Berg Eklundh, L. (2015). Does BBIC make a difference? Structured assessment of child protection and support. Nordic Social Work Research, 3(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.986749
- Matscheck, D., Ljungberg, A., & Topor, A. (2020). Beyond formalized plans: User involvement in support in daily living – users’ and support workers experiences. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(2), 156–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764019894603
- Matscheck, D., Piuva, K., Eriksson, L., & Åberg, M. (2019). The coordinated individual plan – is this a solution for complex organizations to handle complex needs? Nordic Social Work Research, 9(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1489886
- Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education. Josey-Bass.
- Miller, C., & Ahmad, Y. (2000). Collaboration and partnership: An effective response to complexity and fragmentation or a solution built on sand? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 20(5/6), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330010789151
- Morgenstern, J., Hogue, A., Dasaro, C., Kuerbis, A., & Dauber, S. (2008). Characteristics of individuals screening positive for substance use in a welfare setting: Implications for welfare and substance use disorders treatment systems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 561–570. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.561
- Nordén, T., & Norlander, T. (2014). Absence of positive results for flexible assertive community treatment: What is the next approach? Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 10(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901410010087
- Nordström, E. (2016). Samordnad individuell plan (SIP) – Professionellas samt barn och föräldrars erfarenheter [The coordinated individual plan (CIP) – professionals’ and children and parents’ experiences]. Lic. Thesis. Jönköping University, School of Health and Welfare.
- Pils, J. (2011). Personalens syn på brukarinflytande i psykiatrin – Tankar och erfarenheter från kliniskt verksam personal [Personnel’s views on user involvement in psychiatric care – thoughts and experiences from clinical personnel]. Stockholm: FoU-enheten Psykiatri Södra Stockholm [RD Psychiatry Southern Stockholm].
- Piuva, K. (2013). Happy without reason? – mental illness and the ‘right’ to happiness in Sweden. In C. Marklund (Ed.), All well in the welfare state? – welfare, well-being and the politics of happiness (pp. 55–81). Nordic Centre of Excellence Nordwel.
- Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record. Polity Press.
- Simpson, A., Hannigan, B., Coffey, M., Barlow, S., Cohen, R., Jones, A., Všetečková, J., Faulkner, A., Thornton, A., & Cartwright, M. (2016). Recovery-focused care planning and coordination in England and Wales: A cross-national mixed methods comparative case study. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0858-x
- Skogens, L., & von Greiff, N. (2012). Recovery capital in the process of change – differences and similarities between groups of clients treated for alcohol or drug problems. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.739559
- SOU. (1992:73). Välfärd och valfrihet – service, stöd och vård för psykiskt störda [Welfare and freedom of choice – service, support and care for mentally disturbed people]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar.
- SOU. (2006:100). Ambition och ansvar – Nationell strategi för utveckling av samhällets insatser till personer med psykiska sjukdomar och funktionshinder [Ambition and responsibility – national strategy for development of society’s support for personers with psychiatric illness and disability]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar.
- SOU. (2011:35). Bättre insatser vid missbruk och beroende – Individen, kunskapen och ansvaret [Better interventions for substance abuse and addiction – the individual, the knowledge and the responsibility]. Stockholm: Statens offentliga utredningar.
- Tew, J. (2011). Social approaches to mental distress. Palgrave McMillan.
- Vanderplasschen, W., Rapp, R. C., De Maeyer, J., & Van den Noortgate, W. (2019). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of case management for substance use disorders: A recovery perspective. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/psyt.2019.00186