References

• Aaltonen, S. (2017). Challenges in gaining and re-gaining informed consent among young people. On the margins of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1170412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Administrative Procedure Act (434/2004). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2003/en20030434.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar, G. (2019). Thinking critically about self-determination: A literature review. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 16(2), 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2006). Ethics and values in social work. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. (2007). Informed consent: Too much of a good thing or not enough? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J., Appelbaum, P., Lidz, C., & Parker, L. (2001). Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijleveld, G., Dedding, C., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child and Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., & Mason, C. (2020). Child removals as the gateway to further adversity: Birth mother accounts of the immediate and enduring collateral consequences of child removal. Qualitative Social Work, 19(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019893412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, H., Carr, N., & Whelan, S. (2011). ‘Like walking on eggshells’: Service user views and expectations of the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 16(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkemper, E. (2004). Informed consent in social work ethics education: Guiding student education with an informed consent template. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1/2), 141–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., O’Mahony, C., & Brennan, R. (2019). Voluntary care in Ireland: Scoping literature review. School of Applied Social Studies and School of Law, University College Cork.
   Google Scholar
• Calder, M. (Ed.). (2008). The carrot or the stick? Towards effective practice with involuntary clients in safeguarding children work. Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act. (417/2007). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070417_20131292.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Didcock, E. (2007). Issues of consent and competency in children and young people. Paediatrics and Child Health, 17(11), 425–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2007.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Dore, I. (2018). Social work on the edge: Not knowing, singularity and acceptance. European Journal of Social Work, 23(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1463971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enroos, R., & Pösö, T. (in review). Family relatedness: A challenge for making decisions in child welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, T., Korpinen, J., & Pösö, T. (2020). Social workers as relational actors: Descriptions of care order preparations in Finland. Nordic Social Work Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1811137
   Google Scholar
• Falch-Eriksen, E., & Backe-Hansen, E. (Eds.). (2018). Human rights in child protection. Implications for professional practice and policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2017). How children become invisible in child protection work: Evidence from day-to-day social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1007–1023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlong, M. (2003). Self-determination and a critical perspective in casework. Promoting a balance between interdependency and autonomy. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325003002002004
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2008). Informed consent: Option and challenges. In M. Calder (Ed.), The carrot or the stick? Towards effective practice with involuntary clients in safeguarding children work (pp. 37–58). Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2011). Child protection systems. International trends and orientations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, G., & Doyle, C. (2014). Ascertaining the wishes and feelings of young children: Social workers’ perspectives on skills and training. Child & Family Social Work, 19(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepworth, D., & Larsen, J. (1993). Direct social work practice: Theory and skills. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtanen, R. (2020). Suostumus huostaanottoon [Contesting to the taking of child into care]. Lakimies, 3–4, 300–323.
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, E., Höjer, S., & Larsson, M. (2019). Age limits for participation in child protection court proceedings in Sweden. Child & Family Social Work, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12686
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, L. E., & Bryan, V. (2009). A conceptual framework for considering informed consent. Journal of Social Work Values & Ethics, 6(3). http://jswve.org/download/2009-3/JSWVE-Fall-2009-Complete.pdf.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korpinen, J., & Pösö, T. (2020). Social workers’ views about children’s and parents’ competence in child protection decision-making. Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320940635.
   Google Scholar
• Leviner, P. (2014). Child protection under Swedish law – legal duality and uncertainty. European Journal of Social Work, 17(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2013.791249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviner, P., & Lundström, T. (Eds.). (2017). Tvångsvård av barn och unga [Coercive care of children and young people]. Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lonne, B., Harries, M., Featherstone, B., & Gray, M. (2016). Working ethically in child protection. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C., & Boddy, J. (2017). Cooperation or coercion? Children coming into the care system under voluntary arrangements. https://www.frg.org.uk/images/YFYV/KI-Report-10.07-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mantle, G., Moules, T., Johnson, K., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., & Shaffer, R. (2007). Whose wishes and feelings? Children’s autonomy and parental influence in family court enquiries. British Journal of Social Work, 37(5), 785–805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl035
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. A Sage University paper. Qualitative research method series 16. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahoney, C., Brennan, R., & Burns, K. (2020). Informed consent and parental rights in voluntary care agreements. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 32(4), 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. G. (2013). Clinical social workers as diagnosticians: Legal and ethical issues. Clinical Social Work Journal, 41(2), 205–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-013-0444-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollari, K. (2019). Lapsipotilaan päätöksentekokyky ja sen arviointi [The decision-making competence of a child patient and its assessment]. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 387. Lapin yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., & Huhtanen, R. (2017). Removals of children in Finland: A mix of voluntary and involuntary decisions. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems (pp. 18–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., Pekkarinen, E., Helavirta, S., & Laakso, R. (2018). ‘Voluntary’ and ‘involuntary’ child welfare: Challenging the distinction. Journal of Social Work, 18(3), 253–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316653269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (1983). The concept of paternalism in social work. Social Service Review, 57(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/644516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (1987). Informed consent in social work. Social Work, 32(5), 425–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2015). Risk management in social work. Preventing professional malpractice, liability and disciplinary action. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. (2018). Ethical issues in integrated health care: Implications for social worker. Health & Social Work, 43(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hly005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regeher, C., & Antle, B. (1997). Coercive influences: Informed consent in court-mandated social work practice. Social Work, 42(3), 300–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/42.3.300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribbens McCarthy, J., Hooper, C., & Gillies, V. (2013). Family troubles?: Exploring changes and challenges in the family lives of children and young people. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K. (2018). Children’s right to protection under the CRC. In E. Falch-Eriksen, & E. Backe-Hansen (Eds.), Human rights in child protection. Implications for professional practice and policy (pp. 15–38). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Talentia. (2019). Arki, arvot ja etiikka [Every-day life, values and ethics]. https://talentia.e-julkaisu.com/2017/eettiset-ohjeet/.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, J., & Healy, K. (2019). Collaborating with parents during intervention with parental agreement: Practitioners’ perspectives on procedural justice. Child & Family Social Work, 24(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, V., Turner-Halliday, F., Watson, N., Wilson, P., Fitzpatrick, B., Cotmore, R., & Minnis, H. (2017). Randomisation before consent: Avoiding delay to time-critical intervention and ensuring informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(4), 357–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1176751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar