Advanced search
Publication Cover
European Journal of Social Work Volume 25, 2022 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
13,683
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Dilemmas and conflicting pressures in social work practice

Dilemma og krysspress i sosialt arbeids praksis

Signe YlvisakerDepartment of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Marianne RugkåsaDepartment of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, NorwayView further author information
Pages 643-654 | Published online: 30 Jul 2021

References

  • Aadnanes, M. (2017). Social workers’ challenges in the assessment of child abuse and maltreatment: Intersections of class and ethnicity in child protection cases. Critical and Radical Social Work, 5(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/204986017X15029696790559
  • Aamodt, H. (2019). Sosialt arbeid og sosialpolitikk – å ro etter vinden? I H. Aamodt, E. Dahl, E. Gubrium, M. Haldar & Å. Hermansen (red.), Sosialt arbeid og sosialpolitikk i samhandling. Et svar på velferdsstatens utfordringer? Fagbokforlaget. 18–25.
  • Ahrne, G. (1993). Delvis människa, delvis organisation. Sociologisk forskning, 30(1) 59–78.
  • Berg, A.-J., Flemmen, A. B., & Gullikstad, B. (2010). Likestilte norskheter. Om kjønn og etnisitet. Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
  • Blom, B. (1998). Marknadsorientering av socialtjänstens individ-och familjeomsorg: om villkor, processer och konsekvenser. Doctoral dissertation. Umeå University.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Symbolic power. Critique of Anthropology, 4(13–14), 77–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X7900401307
  • Caswell, D., & Innjord, A. K. (2011). Inklusjonsorientert NAV-praksis? Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning nr. 1, 38–50.
  • Cuadra, C. B., & Staaf, A. (2014). Public social services’ encounters with irregular migrants in Sweden: Amid values of social work and control of migration. European Journal of Social Work, 17(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.739556
  • Damsgaard, H. L., & Eide, K. (2012). Utfordringer i velferdsstatens yrker. Fontene forskning nr. 1, 69–81.
  • Djuve, A. B., & Kavli, H. C. (2015). Facilitating user involvement in activation programmes: When carers and clerks meet pawns and queens. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000804
  • Eide, S. B. (2012). Individuelt ansvar og sløvhet i profesjonsutøvelse. Etikk i praksis. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 6(2), 64–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v6i2.1785
  • Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (Exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.
  • Ferguson, I., & Lavalette, M. (2013). Crisis, austerity and the future(s) of social work in the UK. Critical and Radical Social Work, 1(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/204986013X665992
  • FO. (2019). Yrkesetisk grunnlagsdokument for barnevernspedagoger, sosionomer, vernepleiere og velferdsarbeidere.
  • Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practicing critical reflection. A resource handbook. Open University Press.
  • Gordon, J. (2017). The voice of the social worker: A narrative literature review. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(5), 1333–1350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx108
  • Gullestad, M. (1992). Symbolic fences. I the art of social relations. Essays on culture, social action and everyday life in modern Norway. Scandinavian University Press.
  • Hall, C. (1997). Social work as narrative. Storytelling and persuasion in professional texts. Ashgate.
  • Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.
  • Hennum, N. (2011). Barnevernssamtaler som integreringsverktøy. In B. P. Bø (Ed.), Multikulturell teori og flerkulturelle praksiser (pp. 139–162). Abstrakt forlag.
  • Herzfeld, M. (1993). The social production of indifference. Exploring the symbolic roots of western bureaucracy. University of Chicago Press.
  • Juhila, K., Hall, C., & Raitakari, S. (2010). Accounting for the clients’ troublesome behaviors in a supported housing unit. Blames, excuses and responsibility in professionals talk. Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309350657
  • Kamali, M., & Jönsson, J. (red.) (2018). Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work. Current and Future challenges. Routledge. Taylor og Francis Group. 226–237.
  • Kjørstad, M. (2019). Sosialt arbeid møter sosialpolitikk. Utfordringer og dilemmaer. In I. H. Aamodt, E. Dahl, E. Gubrium, M. Haldar, & Å Hermansen (Eds.), Sosialt arbeid og sosialpolitikk i samhandling. Et svar på velferdsstatens utfordringer? (pp. 56–77). Fagbokforlaget.
  • Kojan, B. H., Martinsen, E., Moe, A., & Skjefstad, N. S. (2018). The role of social workers under neoliberal ideology at the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service (NAV). In I. M. Kamali, & J. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work. Current and Future Challenges (pp. 91–100). Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Kroken, R., & Madsen, O. J. (2016). Forvaltning av makt og moral i velferdsstaten. Fra sosialt arbeid til «arbeid med deg selv»? Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Larsen, A. K., Voll, I., & Tysnes, I. B. (2017). Å bli en del av et praksissamfunn. Fontene forskning, 10(2), 32–44.
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Margolin, L. (1997). Under the cover of kindness: The invention of social work. University of Virginia Press.
  • Mik-Meyer, N. (2018). Fagprofessionelles møde med udsatte klienter. Dilemmaer i den organisatoriske praksis. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • Nilssen, V. (2012). Analyse i kvalitative studier. Den skrivende forskeren. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Øvrelid, B. (2018). Profesjonsidentitetens vilkår Sosialt arbeid i Nav. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning nr 2, 103–118.
  • Prottas, J. (1979). People processing: The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. In The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Lexington Books.
  • Riessman, C. K., & Quinney, L. (2005). Narrative in social work. A critical review. Qualitative Social Work, 4(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058643
  • Røysum, A. (2017). ‘How ‘we do social work, not ‘what ‘we do. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2017.1284150
  • Rugkåsa, M. (2012). Likhetens dilemma. Om sivilisering og integrasjon i den velferdsambisiøse norske stat. Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Rugkåsa, M., & Ylvisaker, S. (2018). Resisting Neoliberal changes in social work education. In M. Kamali & J. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work Current and Future challenges (pp. 226–237). Routledge. Taylor og Francis Group.
  • Rugkåsa, M., Ylvisaker, S., & Eide, K. (2017). Barnevern i et minoritetsperspektiv. Sosialt arbeid med barn og familier. Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Rugkåsa, M., & Ylvisaker, S. (2019). From culturalisation to complexity–a critical view on the cultural competence discourse in social work. Nordic Social Work Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2019.1690558
  • Sennett, R. (2017). The fall of public man. WW Norton & Company.
  • Skjefstad, N., Kiik, R., & Sandoval, H. (2018). The role of social workers in Norway. In M. Kamali & J. Jönsson (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work Current and Future Challenges (pp. 137–147). Routledge. Taylor og Francis Group.
  • Steger, M. B., & Roy, R. K. (2010). Neoliberalism: A very short introduction (Vol. 222). Oxford University Press.
  • Stjernø, S. (1982). Omsorg som yrke: arbeidsmåter og yrkesroller på sosialkontoret. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Stjernø, S., & Øverby, E. (2012). Arbeidslinja – arbeidsmotivasjonen og velferdsstaten. Universitetsforlaget.
  • Terum, L. I., & Jessen, J. T. (2015). Den tvetydige aktiveringen: en studie av veiledere ved lokale NAV-kontor. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, vol. 18, nr. 2, 96–109.
  • Vabø, M. (2002). Kvalitetsretorik i norska kommuner. In E. Bejerot, & H. Hasselbladh (red.), Kvalitet utan gränser: En kritisk belysning av kvalitetsstyrning (pp. 147–167). Academica Adacta.
  • Vetlesen, A. J. (2018). I spagaten. Når ansatte forstrekker seg overfor «myke» brukere. In I. R. Kroken (Ed.), Omsorgsforståelser. Mellom poesi, profesjon og politikk (pp. 152–165). Universitetsforlaget.
  • Vike, H. (2004). Velferd uten grenser. Den norske velferdsstaten ved veiskillet. Akribe.
  • Vike, H. (2017). Politics and bureacracy in the Norwegian welfare state: An anthropological approach. Springer.
  • Vitus, K. (2018). Responsibilisation, ideologies and professional identities in danish youth social work. In I. M. Kamali, & J. Jönsson (red.), Neoliberalism, Nordic Welfare States and Social Work. Current and Future challenges (pp. 115–125). Routledge. Taylor og Francis Group.
  • White, S., Fook, J., & Gardener, F. (2006). Critical reflection in health and social care. Open University Press.
  • Ylvisaker, S. (2013). Tales from the sequestered room: Client experiences of social work in Norway and Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 13(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017311412035
  • Ylvisaker, S. (2014). Godhetens makt og avmakt. I A. Ohnstad, M. Rugkåsa & S. Ylvisaker (red.), Ubehaget i sosialt arbeid. Gyldendal Akademisk, 77–91.
  • Ylvisaker, S., & Rugkåsa, M. (2020). Krysspress. Dilemmaer i sosialt arbeid i velferdsstaten. Gyldendal Akademisk.
  • Zacka, B. (2017). When the state meets the street. Harvard university press.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.