References

• Abramovitz, M. (1998). Social work and social reform: An arena of struggle. Social Work, 43(6), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/43.6.512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S. (2016). Professionele perspectieven en praktijken in OCMW gent [The professional perspective framework. An analysis of practices of the PCSW of Ghent]. Hogeschool Gent.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S., Roose, R., & Verschelden, G. (2016). Coming up for air: Exploring an intergenerational perspective on social work. British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1266. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bie, M., & Vandenbussche, J. (2016). 40 jaar OCMW-praktijk op de spanning tussen bijstand als sociaal beleidsinstrument en bijstand als sociaal grondrecht. [40 years public institutions of social welfare]. In M. De Wilde, B. Cantillon, F. Vandenbroucke, & M. De Bie (Eds.), 40 jaar OCMW & bijstand (pp. 49–64). Acco.
   Google Scholar
• De Corte, J., & Roose, R. (2020). Social work as a policy actor: Understanding social policy as an open-ended democratic practice. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1462768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, J., Verschuere, B., & De Bie, M. (2017). The political role of social work: Grasping the momentum of working through interorganizational networks in Belgium. Journal of Social Service Research, 43(3), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2017.1295007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, M. (2016). Het gebruik van discretionaire ruimte door Vlaamse OCMW-medewerkers [The use of discretion in the Flemish Public Center of Social Welfare]. In M. De Wilde, B. Cantillon, F. Vandenbroucke, & M. De Bie (Eds.), 40 jaar OCMW en bijstand (pp. 104–120). Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Dollinger, B., Oelkers, N., & Ziegler, H. (2013). Students of social work in the slipstream of the politics of activation: Results of explorative studies. Social Work & Society, 11(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fazzi, L., & Rosignoli, A. (2016). Reversing the perspective: When the supervisors learn from their trainees: Table 1. British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2008). Reclaiming social work: Challenging neo-liberalism and promoting social justice. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212110
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. (Social work in practice series).
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., & Lavalette, M. (2004). Beyond power discourse: Alienation and social work. British Journal of Social Work, 34(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, K. (2013). Generation and discourse in working life stories. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2015). The ‘why’ and the ‘how’ of policy practice: An eight-country comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct179
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2021). ‘A world to win’: In defence of (dissenting) social work – A response to Chris Maylea. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab009
   Google Scholar
• Goldgehn, L. A. (2004). Generation who, what, Y? What you need to know about generation Y. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 5(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ijea.2140202
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Webb, S. A. (2009). The return of the political in social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00626.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D., & Laredo, E. (2020). The personal is political: Reframing individual acts of kindness as social solidarity in social work practice. European Journal of Social Work, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1805587
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Social Workers. (2014). The role of social work in social protection floor.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. R., & Pritzker, S. (2018). Political social work: Using power to create social change. Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2017). European policy developments and their impact on social work. European Journal of Social Work, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1185707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1928). Das Problem der Generationen [The sociological problem of generations]. Kölner Vierteljahrshefte für Soziologie, 7(2), 157–185.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. (1952). The sociological problem of generations [Das Problem der Generationen] (P. Kecskemeti, trans.). In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–320). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘heroic agency’ in conceptualising social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42(6), 1022–1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, S. (2018). Power, politics and social work: The need to reinvent social work worldwide – Contributions from Latin American thought. https://www.ifsw.org/power-politics-and-social-work-the-need-to-reinvent-social-work-worldwide-contributions-from-latin-american-thought/.
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, B. (2016). Re-envisioning macro social work practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 97(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.2016.97.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwisse, A., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2011). Everyday realities and visionary ideals among social workers in the Nordic countries: A matter of specialization and work tasks? Nordic Social Work Research, 1(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2011.562030
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2007). Artistic activism and agonistic spaces. Art & Research. Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 1, 2. http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2009). The democratic paradox. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2019). For a left populism. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., & Hermans, K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C. (2018). Intergenerational dialogue: Connecting youth and older adults in urban spaces through community-based forum theatre. Applied Theatre Research, 6(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1386/atr.6.1.37_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Reisch, M., & Gambrill, E. (1997). Social work in the 21st century. Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, R., Roets, G., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2012). Irony and social work: In search of the happy sisyphus. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1592–1607. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterly, B. A., Cullen, J., & Dyson, D. A. (2018). The intergenerational mentoring model: An alternative to traditional and reverse models of mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1530172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science (S. Muecke, trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Strier, R., & Breshtling, O. (2016). Professional resistance in social work: Counterpractice assemblages. Social Work, 61(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabin, J.-P., & Perriard, A. (2016). Active social policies revisited by social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 19(3–4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1131147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trappenburg, M., & van Beek, G. (2019). ‘My profession is gone’: How social workers experience de-professionalization in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Work, 22(4), 676–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1399255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandekinderen, C., Roose, R., Raeymaeckers, P., & Hermans, K. (2020). The DNA of social work as a human rights practice from a frontline social workers’ perspective in Flanders. European Journal of Social Work, 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1663408
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I. (2008). The person-in-environment approach: Professional ideology and practice of social workers in Israel. Social Work, 53(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/53.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I. (2017). What options do we have? Exploring routes for social workers’ policy engagement. Journal of Policy Practice, 16(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2016.1234955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. Y., Lee, J., & Lee, C. H. (2013). Interacting with screenagers in classrooms. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.370
   Google Scholar