References

• Alfandari, R. (2017). Systemic barriers to effective utilization of decision making tools in child protection practice. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfandari, R. (2019). Multi-professional work in child protection decision-making: An Israeli case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 98, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfandari, R., & Taylor, B. J. (2021a). Systematic bibliographic database searching for literature reviews: Case study on child protection decision making. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab013
   Google Scholar
• Alfandari, R., & Taylor, B. J. (2021b). Processes of multi-professional child protection decision making in hospital setting: Systematic narrative review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211029404
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose-Miller, W., & Ashcroft, R. (2016). Challenges faced by social workers as members of interprofessional collaborative health care teams. Health & Social Work, 41(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlw006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. V., Terlektsi, E., & Coombes, L. (2013). The use of sociograms to explore collaboration in child protection conferences. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2140–2146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaption. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baginsky, M., & Manthorpe, J. (2020). Keeping children and young people safe during a pandemic: Testing the robustness of multi-agency child protection and safeguarding arrangements for schools. King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Balsley, K., Pierce, M. C., Katsogridakis, Y. L., Rosado, N., Mathey, L., Hickey, S., & Kelleher, M. (2019). Multidisciplinary quality improvement approach to standardize care and communication for suspected child abuse arriving to the ED. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 20(3), Article 100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpem.2019.100715
   Google Scholar
• Bond, E., & Dogaru, C. (2019). An evaluation of an inter-disciplinary training programme for professionals to support children and their families who have been sexually abused online. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(3), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, F. C., Kugler, K. G., Fischer, J. A., Heinze, J., & Fischer, D. (2021). Group-level integrative complexity: Enhancing differentiation and integration in group decision-making. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219892698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2017). Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrerizo, F. J., Martínez, M. A., Cobo, M. J., Lázaro-Rodríguez, P., López-Gijón, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Aggregation operators in group decision making: Identifying citation classics via H-classics. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.453
   Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan Jr (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current directions (pp. 221–246). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, J. (2017). Practice wisdom in social work: An uncommon sense in the intersubjective encounter. European Journal of Social Work, 20(5), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corby, B., Millar, M., & Young, L. (1996). Parental participation in child protection work: Rethinking the rhetoric. British Journal of Social Work, 26(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulthard, B., Mallett, J., & Taylor, B. J. (2020). Better decisions for children with ‘big data’: Can algorithms promote fairness, transparency and parental engagement? Societies, 10(97), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10040097
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Zha, Q., Zhang, H., Kou, G., Fujita, H., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Knowledge-Based Systems, 162, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Taylor, B. J., & McCall, S. (2006). Human rights and decision-making in child protection through explicit argumentation. Child Care in Practice, 12(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575270600618331
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, M. A. (2004). Gestalt groups revisited: A phenomenological approach. Gestalt Review, 8(3), 336–357. https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.8.3.0336
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, E. (2004). Protecting children: Why don't core groups work? Lessons from the literature. Practice, 16(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950315042000254947
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2008). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
   Google Scholar
• He, X., & Mittal, V. (2007). The effect of decision risk and project stage on escalation of commitment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2016). Sense-making in a social work office: An ethnographic study of safeguarding judgements. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera-Viedma, E., Cabrerizo, F. J., Kacprzyk, J., & Pedrycz, W. (2014). A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Information Fusion, 17, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzler, S., & Messmer, H. (2010). Group decision-making in child welfare and the pursuit of participation. Qualitative Social Work, 9(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010372156
   Google Scholar
• Hood, R., Gillespie, J., & Davies, J. (2016). A conceptual review of interprofessional expertise in child safeguarding. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2016.1173656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R., Price, J., Sartori, D., Maisey, D., Johnson, J., & Clark, Z. (2017). Collaborating across the threshold: The development of interprofessional expertise in child safeguarding. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 31(6), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1329199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housley, W. (2003). Interaction in multidisciplinary teams. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani, A. (2011). Escalation of commitment in troubled IT projects: Influence of project risk factors and self-efficacy on the perception of risk and the commitment to a failing project. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 5(6), 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., & Milner, J. (1996). Child protection decision-making. Child Abuse Review, 5(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0852(199605)5:2<91::AID-CAR236>3.0.CO;2-C
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killick, C., & Taylor, B. J. (2020). Assessment, risk and decision making in social work: An introduction. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kistin, C. J., Tien, I., Bauchner, H., Parker, V., & Leventhal, J. M. (2010). Factors that influence the effectiveness of child protection teams. Pediatrics, 126(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, N. A., & Gunderman, R. B. (2008). Gestalt theory: Implications for radiology education. American Journal of Roentgenology, 190(5), 1156–1160. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalayants, M. (2013). Multidisciplinary collaboration in child protective clinical consultations: Perceptions of best practices. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 7(3), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2013.798245
   Google Scholar
• Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.003101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty, P. (2020). “Do I read it? No”. Knowledge utilisation in child welfare decisions. Child Care in Practice, Ahead-of-print, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2020.1765149
   Google Scholar
• Montecinos-Pearce, A., Rodrigo, P., & Duran, I. J. (2020). When is escalation of commitment unstoppable in group settings? An iterative economic modelling approach to unveil the dark side of group decision-making. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(8), 1387–1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullineux, J., Taylor, B. J., & Giles, M. (2020). Professional judgement about re-offending: Factorial survey. Journal of Social Work, 20(6), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319848889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (1999). Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(8), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00053-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, L., & Leonard, K. (2014). Decision making in children and families’ social work: The practitioner’s voice. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, T. (1999). Decision making in social work. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, V. L., Kaufman, D. R., & Arocha, J. F. (2002). Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 35(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0464(02)00009-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, I. J., Cabrerizo, F. J., Alonso, S., Dong, Y. C., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). On dynamic consensus processes in group decision making problems. Information Sciences, 459, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, J., Gear, A., Jones, C., & Read, M. (2005). The child protection conference: A study of process and an evaluation of the potential for on-line group support. Child Abuse Review, 14(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.877
   Google Scholar
• Przeperski, J., & Taylor, B. J. (2020). Cooperation in child welfare decision-making: Qualitative vignette study. Child Care in Practice, Ahead-of-print, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2019.1701412
   Google Scholar
• Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, D. (2005). Inter-organisational collaboration in family-centred practice: A framework for analysis and action. Australian Social Work, 58(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0748.2005.00198.x
   Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D. (2005). The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicora, A., Taylor, B. J., Alfandari, R., Enosh, G., Helm, D., Killick, C., Lyons, O., Mullineux, J., Przeperski, J., Rölver, M., & Whittaker, A. (2021). Using intuition in social work decision making. European Journal of Social Work, 24(5), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1918066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M., & Tonheim, M. (2019). Improving decision-making in care order proceedings: A multijurisdictional study of court decision-makers’ viewpoints. Child & Family Social Work, 24(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonney, J., Willgerodt, M., Lindhorst, T., & Brock, D. (2018). Elizabeth: Typical or troubled teen? A training case for health professionals to recognize and report child maltreatment. MedEdPORTAL, 14(10712), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10712
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., Devaney, J., & Hayes, D. (2015). In and out of home care decisions: The influence of confirmation bias in developing decision supportive reasoning. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2
   Google Scholar
• Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Integrative complexity at forty: Steps toward resolving the scoring dilemma. Political Psychology, 35(5), 597–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szilassy, E., Carpenter, J., Patsios, D., & Hackett, S. (2013). Outcomes of short course interprofessional training in domestic violence and child protection. Violence Against Women, 19(11), 1370–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213513857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia García, J. M., del Moral, M. J., Martinez, M. A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A consensus model for group decision-making problems with interval fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(4), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622012500174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B.J., Mullineux, J.C., & Fleming, G. (2010). Partnership, service needs and assessing competence in post qualifying education and training. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 29(5), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470903159117
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017). Decision making, Assessment and Risk in social work (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2020). Risk-managing decision making: A psycho-social rationality model. British Journal of Social Work, 51(7), 2819–2838. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., Killick, C., Bertotti, T., Enosh, G., Gautschi, J., Hietamäki, J., Sicora, A., & Whittaker, A. (2018). European Social Work Research Association SIG to study decisions, assessment and risk. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 15(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/23761407.2017.1394244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindale, R. S., & Kameda, T. (2000). “Social sharedness” as a unifying theme for information processing in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003002002
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. H., & Young, M. J. (2010). Anger, fear, and escalation of commitment. Cognition & Emotion, 24(6), 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903050631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, J., Miller-Cribbs, J., Kientz, E., Carlson, J., & DeShea, L. (2017). Impact of simulation on student attitudes about interprofessional collaboration. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(8), 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. F. E., Yik, M., Kwong, J., & Y, Y. (2006). Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330(6004), 686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar