References

• Aiken, J. H., & Wizner, S. (2003). Law as social work. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 11, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Alexy, R. (2004). A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ASWCR (2006). The code of ethics of association of social workers of the Czech Republic. http://socialnipracovnici.cz/public/upload/image/eticky_kodex_sspcr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barak, A. (2012). Proportionality: Constitutional rights and their limitations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brems, E. (2005). Conflicting human rights: An exploration in the context of the right to a fair trial in the European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(1), 294–326. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069786. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2005.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congress, E. P. (2000). What social workers should know about ethics: Understanding and resolving practice dilemmas. Advances in Social Work Practice, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18060/124
   Google Scholar
• Červínek, Z. (2020). Proporcionalita [proportionality]. In T. Sobek & M. Hapla (Eds.), Filosofie práva [Philosophy of law] (pp. 365–394). Nugis Finem.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, M. R., & Hickman, S. (2011). Dual relations and beyond: Understanding and addressing ethical challenges for rural social work. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 8(1), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive social care and law. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, J. (2012). The definition of social work in the United Kingdom, 2000–2010. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00782.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolgoff, R., Harrington, D., & Lowenberg, F. M. (2012). Ethical decisions for social work. Practice. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbrill, G. (2011). Doing anti-oppressive protection casework. In D. Baines (Ed.), Doing anti-oppressive practice. Social justice social work (pp. 51–63). Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J. (1993). Radical casework: A theory of practice. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2016). ‘Introducing Michael Gove to Loïc Wacquant’: Why social work needs critical sociology. British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2020). Faulty ‘tools’? Why social work scholarship needs to take a more critical approach to Michel Foucault. Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319830538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofschneiderová, A. (2016). Praktický právní průvodce nejlepším zájmem dítěte. Pro pracovníky orgánu sociálně-právní ochrany dětí [A practical legal guide to the best interests of the child. For workers of the social and legal protection of children]. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/uzivatel/Downloads/Prakticky-pravni-pruvodce-nejlepsim-zajmem-ditete1%20(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hofschneiderová, A. (2017). O konceptu nejlepšího zájmu dítěte [About the concept of the best interests of the child]. https://www.epravo.cz/top/clanky/o-konceptu-nejlepsiho-zajmu-ditete-106509.html
   Google Scholar
• Hofschneiderová, A. (2019). Kritika osobování si „odbornosti” na život, osobnost či duši dítěte aneb o právním postavení dítěte v postmoderní společnosti [Criticism of the person’s “expertise” on the life, personality or soul of the child or on the legal status of the child in postmodern society]. https://www.epravo.cz/top/clanky/kritika-osobovani-si-odbornosti-na-zivot-osobnost-ci-dusi-ditete-aneb-o-pravnim-postaveni-ditete-v-postmoderni-spolecnosti-110196.html?fbclid = IwAR3ZXwI_lFixXrtHxmN7TzAVj0XAZyurk6Rd8Gc5UTJ0-qL_djrSylJ3wgU
   Google Scholar
• Iarskaia-Smirnova, E., Kononenko, R., Kosova, O., & Yarskaya, V. (2020). ‘They should cook borsch, chop wood … ’: Contemporary images of social work in the context of welfare policy reforms in Russia’s print media. European Journal of Social Work, 24(2), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1810640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFSW. (2018). Global social work statement of ethical principles. https://www.ifsw.org/global-social-work-statement-of-ethical-principles/.
   Google Scholar
• Janebová, R. (2019). Jak řešit kolize mezi praxí sociální práce a právem [How to resolve conflicts between the practice of social work and the law]. Sociální Práce/ Sociálna Práca, 19(5), 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• Janebová, R. (2022) Loïc Wacquant, the concept of the ‘centaur state' and social work: the case of the Czech Republic. European Journal of Social Work, 25(1), 4–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1819206
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, P. (2001). From minimal intervention to minimal support: Child protection services under the neo-liberal Kennett Government in Victoria 1992–1999. Children Australia, 26(01), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/s103507720001004x
   Google Scholar
• Mertl, J. (2017). Přerozdělování welfare. Nástroj pomoci, nebo kontroly? [Redistribution of welfare. The tool of help or control?]. Doplněk.
   Google Scholar
• Möller, K. (2012). The global model of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrot, I. (2013). Social work and poverty: A critical approach. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston-Shoot, M., Roberts, G., & Vernon, S. (1998). Working together in social work law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 20(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069808410240
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2015). Risk management. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resolution of the Presidium of the Czech National Council of 16 December 1992 on the declaration of the Charter of Fundamental Right and Freedoms as a part of the constitutional order of the Czech Republic, c. 2 (1993). (Cz.). https://www.usoud.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/ustavni_soud_www/Pravni_uprava/AJ/Listina_English_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkranzová, O., Melzer, F., Hlouch, L., Hapla, M., Horák, O., & Osina, P. (2017). Praktikum z právní metodologie [Practice of legal methodology]. Leges.
   Google Scholar
• Schlink, B. (2012). Proportionality (1). In M. Rosenfield & A. Sajó (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law (pp. 718–736). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2008). Counselling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zháněl, J., Hellenbradt, V., & Sebera, M. (2014). Metodologie výzkumné práce [Methodology of research work]. Masarykova univerzita.
   Google Scholar