References

• Aviv, I., Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2021). Social workers as street-level policy entrepreneurs. Public Administration, 99(3), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackshaw, T. (2010). Key concepts in community studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organisations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq093
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2013). Street-level organisations and the welfare state. In E. Z. Brodkin, & G. Marston (Eds.), Work and the welfare state: Street-level organisations and workfare politics (pp. 22–32). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, H. L., Banks, S., Robertson, J., & Henderson, P. (2007). Critical community practice. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Statistical abstract of Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2016). Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods. In J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. E. Clarke (Eds.), Developing grounded theory: The second generation (pp. 127–193). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016665919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N. (2021). Policy entrepreneurship at the street level: Understanding the effect of the individual. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G. (2017). Community organising against racism: ‘Race’, ethnicity and community development. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, C. (2011). Revisiting Lipsky: Front-line work in UK local governance. Political Studies, 59(4), 978–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2015). Professionals and discretion in street-level bureaucracy. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 279–293). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2018). Social work promoting participation: Reflections on policy practice in Italy. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1320528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freie, J. F. (1998). Counterfeit community: The exploitation of our longing for connectedness. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble, D., & Weil, M. (2013). Community: Practice interventions, Encyclopedia of Social Work. Accessed August 19, 2020, from http://socialwork.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-532.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, L. M., & Gant, L. M. (2018). Community practice in social work: Reflections on its first century and directions for the future. Social Service Review, 92(4), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/701640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, D. A., Powers, P. R., & Wenocur, S. (2004). Community practice: Theories and skills for social workers. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. (2019). Introduction. In B. Jansen (Ed.), Rethinking community through transdisciplinary research (pp. 1–28). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Karagkounis, V. (2021). Austerity, social work and the rediscovery of community work. European Journal of Social Work, 24(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1654434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, E., Cohen, N., & Nouman, H. (2018). Reinforcing public responsibility? Influences and practices in street-level bureaucrats’ engagement in policy design. Public Administration, 96(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lotta, G., & Pires, R. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and social inequality. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 86–101). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, R., Shaw, M., & Banks, S. (2016). Politics, power and community development: An introductory essay. In R. R. Meade, & S. Banks (Eds.), Politics, power and community development (pp. 1–30). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monterescu, D. (2015). Jaffa shared and shattered: Contrived coexistence in Israel/Palestine. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moshe-Grodofsky, M. (2019). The Israeli context. In J. Duffy, J. Campbell, & C. Tosone (Eds.), International perspectives on social work and political conflict (pp. 94–109). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musil, L., Kubalcikova, K., Hubikova, O., & Necasova, M. (2004). Do social workers avoid the dilemmas of work with clients? European Journal of Social Work, 7(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369145042000291797
   Google Scholar
• Nothdurfter, U., & Hermans, K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchey, R., Williams, J., & Carter, Y. H. (2008). From street-level bureaucrats to street-level policy entrepreneurs? Central policy and local action in lottery-funded community cancer care. Social Policy & Administration, 42(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00588.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shdema, I., Haj-Yahya, N., & Schnell, I. (2018). The social space of Arab residents of mixed Israeli cities. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 100(4), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2018.1428496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz-Ziv, T., & Strier, R. (2020). Place-making: Toward a place-aware community practice agenda. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, R., Abu-Rayya, H. M., & Shwartz-Ziv, T. (2021). Social services in ethnically mixed cities: Street-level bureaucracy at the crossroads of ethno-national conflict. Administration & Society, 53(8), 1203–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399721996325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truell, R. (2019). Understanding the social work role in war and conflict: Towards global validation, shared learning and policy development. In J. Duffy, J. Campbell, & C. Tosone (Eds.), International perspectives on social work and political conflict (pp. 171–183). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2009). The new welfare bureaucrats: Entanglements of race, class, and policy reform. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, G. (2011). Race, poverty, and policy implementation: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096
   Google Scholar
• Weil, M. (2005). Introduction: Contexts and challenges for 21st-century. In M. Weil (Ed.), The handbook of community practice (2nd., pp. 3–26). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, M., Gamble, D. N., & Ohmer, M. L. (2013). Evolution, models and the changing context of community practice. In M. Weil, M. Reisch, & M. L. Ohmer (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (2nd., pp. 167–194). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., Gal, J., Schwartz-Tayri, T., Gewirtz-Meydan, A., & Sommerfeld, D. (2018). Social workers’ policy practice in Israel: Internal, indirect, informal and role contingent. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1499614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O., & Yacobi, H. (2003). Urban ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the production of space in an Israeli ‘mixed city’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21(6), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1068/d47j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhao, J., & Dong, W. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats as policy entrepreneurs: Action strategies for flexible community governance in China. Public Administration, 99(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar