References

• Amann, K., & Kindler, T. (2021). Social workers in politics–a qualitative analysis of factors influencing social workers’ decision to run for political office. European Journal of Social Work, 25(4), 655–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apgar, D., & Luquet, W. (2022). Linking social work licensing exam content to educational competencies: Poor reliability challenges the path to licensure. Research on Social Work Practice, 0(0), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (2013). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aviv, I., Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2021). Social workers as street-level policy entrepreneurs. Public Administration, 99(3), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P. & Baratz, M. (1970). Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burzlaff, M. (2020). Policy Practice–Eine Einführung mit Fokus auf Curricula Sozialer Arbeit. In G. Rieger, & J. Wurtzbacher (Eds.), Tatort Sozialarbeitspolitik. Fallbezogene Politiklehre für die Soziale Arbeit (pp. 27–51). Beltz Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Power and changing modes of governance in the euro crisis. Governance, 31(4), 609–624.
   Google Scholar
• Chambon, A. (2013). Recognising the other, understanding the other: A brief history of social work and otherness. Nordic Social Work Research, 3(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2013.835137
   Google Scholar
• Colby, I. C. (2018). The handbook of policy practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A. (2008). Policy practice. In I. C. Colby (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of social work and social welfare, social policy and policy practice (pp. 129–143). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, G. (2020). Making the connection between theories of policy change and policy practice: A new conceptualization. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, G. (2022). Disruptive social work: Forms, possibilities and tensions. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I., Ioakimidis, V., & Lavalette, M. (2018). Global social work in a political context: Radical perspectives. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Figueira-McDonough, J. (1993). Policy practice: The neglected side of social work intervention. Social Work, 38(2), 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2006). 19. December 1973. In Psychiatric power (pp. 143–171). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2022). Gender, Race, and Class through the Lens of Labor. Benjamin Lecture 1 [video]. https://criticaltheoryinberlin.de/benjamin_lectures/2022/.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers. A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, J., & Weiss-Gal, I. (2015). The 'Why' and the 'How' of policy practice: An eight-country comparison. British Journal of Social Work, 45(4), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2018). Welfare words: Critical social work & social policy. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Hanbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70–80). Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (2000). The gramsci reader: Selected writings, 1916-1935. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1980). Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (1986). Social workers and their practice in welfare bureaucracies. Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Hubíková, O., Havlíková, J., & Trbola, R. (2021). Social work goals in the context of their weak institutional anchoring. Sociální Práce, 21(5), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• The International Federation of Social Workers/The International Association of Schools of Social Work. (2014). The Global definition of Social Work. https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/.
   Google Scholar
• Kananen, J. (2014). The nordic welfare state in three eras: From emancipation to discipline. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Krumer-Nevo, M. (2020). Radical hope: Poverty-aware practice for social work. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunstreich, T. (2003). Social welfare in nazi Germany. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 14(2), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J059v14n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1984). The powers of association. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00115.x
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th anniversary edition: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, W. (2004). Towards a European paradigma of social work. Studies in the history of modes of social work and social policy in Europe [Thesis]. Dresden: Technischen Universität Dresden.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, R. A. (2014). Foucault's theory of power. In D. Taylor (Ed.), Michel foucault: Key concepts (pp. 13–26). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E. (2019). Neoliberal regimes of welfare in scandinavia. In S. A. Webb (Ed.), The routledge handbook of critical social work (pp. 302–311). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E. (2019). A processual view on institutions. A note from a phenomenological institutional perspective. In T. Reay, T. B. Zilber, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Institutions and organizations: A process view (pp. 33–41). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance (political economy of institutions and decisions). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ornellas, A., Spolander, G., & Engelbrecht, L. K. (2018). The global social work definition: Ontology, implications and challenges. Journal of Social Work, 18(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316654606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninx, R. (2009). Decentralising integration policies. Managing migration in cities, regions and localities. Policy Network.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (2012). Governance as political theory. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 19–32). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, A. (2004). Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Popitz, H. (2017). Phenomena of power. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. (2000). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Strier, R., & Bershtling, O. (2016). Professional resistance in social work: Counterpractice assemblages. Social Work, 61(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Špiláčková, M. (2014). Soziale Arbeit im Sozialismus: Ein Beispiel aus der Tschechoslowakei (1968-1989). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Timor-Shlevin, S. (2022). Between othering and recognition: In search of transformative practice at the street level. European Journal of Social Work, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2092456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Shlevin, S., & Benjamin, O. (2022). The struggle over the character of social services: Conceptualising hybridity and power. European Journal of Social Work, 25(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1838452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Shlevin, S., Hermans, K., & Roose, R. (2022). In search of social justice-informed services: A research agenda for the study of resistance to neo-managerialism. British Journal of Social Work, 0(0), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2014). Social workers as policy actors. Journal of Social Policy, 43(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., & Gal, J. (2020). Explaining the policy practice of community social workers. Journal of Social Work, 20(2), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318814996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., Gal, J., Schwartz-Tayri, T., Gewirtz-Meydan, A., & Sommerfeld, D. (2020). Social workers’ policy practice in Israel: Internal, indirect, informal and role contingent. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1499614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (2010). Process and reality. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. (2020). Social work assessment: What are we meant to assess? Ethics and Social Welfare, 14(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2019.1686046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J., & Dixon, J. (2005). Professional ideologies and preferences in social work: A British study in global perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 35(6), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogata-Kusz, A. (2022). Policy advocacy and NGOs assisting immigrants: Legitimacy, accountability and the perceived attitude of the majority. Social Sciences, 11(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020077
   Google Scholar