References

• Alvesson, M. (2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J., Travers, J. L., Buschman, P., & Merrill, J. A. (2018). An efficient nurse practitioner-led community-based service model for delivering coordinated care to persons with serious mental illness at risk for homelessness. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 24(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390317704044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlqvist-Jönsson, P., Schön, U.-K., Rosenberg, D., Sandlund, M., & Svedberg, P. (2015). Users’ experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(9), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., Tondora, J., Pavlo, A., & Stanhope, V. (2017). Shared decision making within the context of recovery-oriented care. Mental Health Review Journal, 22(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-01-2017-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, E., Best, C., & Hagen, S. (2010). Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, S., Knutsson, O., & Schön, U.-K. (2022). Perceptions of participation: How nursing home staff and managers perceive and strive for participation of older residents. European Journal of Social Work, 26(5), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2094345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grim, K., Tistad, M., Schön, U.-K., & Rosenberg, D. (2019). The legitimacy of user knowledge in decision-making processes in mental health care: An analysis of epistemic injustice. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 6(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-019-00145-9
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). The attributes of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 9–32). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., Knutsson, O., & Schön, U.-K. (2021). Coordinated individual care planning and shared decision making: Staff perspectives within the comorbidity field of practice. European Journal of Social Work, 25(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.2016649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson, O., & Schön, U.-K. (2020). Co-creating a process of user involvement and shared decision-making in coordinated care planning with users and caregivers in social services. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 15(1), Article 1812270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1812270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, L., Gewirtz, S., & Cribb, A. (2017). Shared decision-making in Israeli social services: Social workers’ perspectives on policy making and implementation. British Journal of Social Work, 47(2), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., & Piuva, K. (2022a). Integrated care for individuals with mental illness and substance abuse – The example of the coordinated individual plan in Sweden. European Journal of Social Work, 25(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1843409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., & Piuva, K. (2022b). In the center or caught in the middle? – Social workers’ and healthcare professionals’ views on user involvement in coordinated individual plans in Sweden. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykänen, P. (2019). Shared decision making in the social services? reasons to consider when choosing methods for service user participation. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 26(2), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykänen, P., Schön, U.-K., & Björk, A. (2021). Shared decision making in social services – Some remaining questions. Nordic Social Work Research, 13(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1958908
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Stacey, D., Barry, M., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., Entwistle, V. A., Fiset, V., Holmes-Rovner, M., Khangura, S., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., & Rovner, D. (2009). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), Article CD001431, 1–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, J. E., Howe, C., Doyle, C., & Bell, D. (2019). Successful healthcare improvements from translating evidence in complex systems (SHIFT-evidence): Simple rules to guide practice and research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(3), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeer, K. (1999). Stakeholder analysis guidelines. Policy Toolkit for Strengthening Health Sector Reform, 1, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Stovell, D., Morrison, A. P., Panayiotou, M., & Hutton, P. (2016). Shared treatment decision making and empowerment related outcomes in psychosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 209(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.158931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar