Digital communication and child participation in child welfare services: a scoping review of potentials and challenges

References

• *Andersen, L. B., Danholt, P., & Lauritsen, P. (2018). Digitization and the distance between case managers and placed children in Teledialogue. STS Encounters - DASTS Working Paper Series, 10(2.3), 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Arbeiter, E., & Toros, K. (2017). Participatory discourse: Engagement in the context of child protection assessment practices from the perspectives of child protection workers, parents and children. Children and Youth Services Review, 74, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Balsells, MÁ, Fuentes-Peláez, N., & Pastor, C. (2017). Listening to the voices of children in decision-making: A challenge for the child protection system in Spain. Children and Youth Services Review, 79(March), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.055
   Google Scholar
• *Breyette, S. K., & Hill, K. (2015). The impact of electronic communication and social media on child welfare practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 33(4), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2015.1101408
   Google Scholar
• *Byrne, J., Kirwan, G., & Mc Guckin, C. (2019). Social media surveillance in social work: Practice realities and ethical implications. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(2–3), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1584598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Conrad, J. B., & Magsamen-Conrad, K. (2022). Understanding the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on families involved in the child welfare system: Technological capital and pandemic practice. Child & Family Social Work, 27(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cooner, T. S., Beddoe, L., Ferguson, H., & Joy, E. (2020). The use of Facebook in social work practice with children and families: Exploring complexity in an emerging practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1680335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2016). ‘You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you’: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. L., & Lorenzo, M. V. C. (2014). Can information and communication technologies support patient engagement? A review of opportunities and challenges in health social work. Social Work in Health Care, 53(9), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.936991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Denby, R. W., Gomez, E., & Alford, K. A. (2016). Promoting well-being through relationship building: The role of smartphone technology in foster care. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2016.1168761
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. (2018). “Revolutionizing” participation in child protection proceedings [PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University].
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., Greenop, D., & Hills, M. (2016). Participation in child protection: A small-scale qualitative study. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 15(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015578946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falch-Eriksen, A., Toros, K., Sindi, I., & Lehtme, R. (2021). Children expressing their views in child protection casework: Current research and their rights going forward. Child & Family Social Work, 26(3), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ferguson, H., Kelly, L., & Pink, S. (2022). Social work and child protection for a post-pandemic world: The re-making of practice during COVID-19 and its renewal beyond it. Journal of Social Work Practice, 36(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2021.1922368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fond-Harmant, L., Philippart, A., Megherbi, S., Pereaux, P., & Gavrila-Ardelean, M. (2023). Digitalization of the European society: Challenges for social work. Social Work Review, 1, 141–155.
   Google Scholar
• *Gomez, E., Alford, K. A., Denby, R. W., & Klein-Cox, A. (2021). Implementing smartphone technology to support relational competence in foster youth: A service provider perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(4), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2020.1843145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gross, M., Latham, D., Randolph, K., Constantino, C., & Preshia, E. C. (2022). Information and communications technology use in rural child welfare work. Child & Family Social Work, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze-Pedersen, S., & Bengtsson, T. T. (2024). Developing a model for child participation in child welfare services. Child & Family Social Work.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husby, I. S. D., Slettebø, T., & Juul, R. (2018). Partnerships with children in child welfare: The importance of trust and pedagogical support. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jeyasingham, D. (2020). Entanglements with offices, information systems, laptops and phones: How agile working is influencing social workers’ interactions with each other and with families. Qualitative Social Work, 19(3), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020911697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križ, K., & Roundtree-Swain, D. (2017). “We are merchandise on a conveyer belt”: How young adults in the public child protection system perceive their participation in decisions about their care. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagsten, J., & Andersson, A. (2018). Use of information systems in social work–challenges and an agenda for future research. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 850–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1423554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mackrill, T., & Ebsen, F. (2018). Key misconceptions when assessing digital technology for municipal youth social work. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1326878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mackrill, T., & Ørnbøll, J. K. (2019). The MySocialworker app system–a pilot interview study. European Journal of Social Work, 22(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1469471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megele, C., & Malik, S. (2020). Social media and social work with children and young people and looked after children. In C. Megele, & P. Buzzi (Eds.), Social media and social work (pp. 61–92). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., Fantus, S., & McInroy, L. B. (2017). Informal use of information and communication technology: Adjunct to traditional face-to-face social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0576-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K., & Scaramuzzino, G. (2023). Digitalization, stress, and social worker–client relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Work, 23(6), 1080–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231180309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordesjö, K., Scaramuzzino, G., & Ulmestig, R. (2022). The social worker-client relationship in the digital era: A configurative literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 25(2), 303–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor, C., Balsells, MÀ, Vaquero, E., Mateo, M., & Ciurana, A. (2022). Uninformed, afraid and confused: What children need to know at the beginning of their foster care process. Child Care in Practice, 28(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2020.1723065
   Google Scholar
• Peláez, A. L., & Marcuello-Servós, C. (2018). e-Social work and digital society: Re-conceptualizing approaches, practices and technologies. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 801–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1520475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2022). Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2013). Social work in a digital age: Ethical and risk management challenges. Social Work, 58(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swt003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ryan, D., & Garrett, P. M. (2018). Social work “logged on”: contemporary dilemmas in an evolving “techno-habitat”. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1278520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sage, M., Wells, M., Sage, T., & Devlin, M. (2017). Supervisor and policy roles in social media use as a new technology in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbjørnsen, S. E. N., & Willumsen, E. (2017). Service user participation in interprofessional teams in child welfare in Norway: Vulnerable adolescents’ perceptions. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1995), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12242
   Google Scholar
• *Seay, K. D., & McRell, A. S. (2021). Child welfare services response to COVID-19: Addressing face-to-face contacts. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 30(8), 2055–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02000-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibilla, M., & Gorgoni, A. (2023). Smart welfare and slow digital poverty: The new face of social work. European Journal of Social Work, 26(3), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2022.2040440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Simpson, J. E. (2017). Staying in touch in the digital era: New social work practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2017.1277908
   Google Scholar
• Skauge, B., Storhaug, A. S., & Marthinsen, E. (2021). The what, why and how of child participation—a review of the conceptualization of “child participation” in child welfare. Social Sciences, 10(2), Article 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10020054
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, O. (2021). Social work in the digital era: Theoretical, ethical and practical considerations. British Journal of Social Work, 51(8), 3358–3374. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stott, T. C., MacEachron, A., & Gustavsson, N. (2017). Social media and child welfare: Policy, training, and the risks and benefits from the administrator’s perspective. Advances in Social Work, 17(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.18060/21263
   Google Scholar
• Tregeagle, S., & Darcy, M. (2008). Child welfare and information and communication technology: Today’s challenge. British Journal of Social Work, 38(8), 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar