References

• Baldwin, C. (2013). Narrative social work. Theory and application. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89hwd
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Estey-Burtt, B. (2012). Narrative and the reconfiguration of social work ethics [Online]. Narrative Works, 2(2). https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/NW/article/view/20169
   Google Scholar
• Baumberg Geiger, B. (2021). Disabled but not deserving? The perceived deservingness of disability welfare benefit claimants. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928721996652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., Croft, S., & Adshead, L. (2008). ‘We don’t See Her as a social worker’: A service user case study of the importance of the social worker’s relationship and humanity. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(7), 1388–1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, A., Hingley-Jones, H., & Ruch, G. (2016). Relationship-based practise revisited. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(3), 299–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1215978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T., & Hupe, P. (Eds.). (2020). Discretion and the quest for controlled freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H., Disney, T., Warwick, L., Leigh, J., Singh Cooner, T., & Beddoe, L. (2021). Hostile relationships in social work practice: Anxiety, hate and conflict in long-term work with involuntary service users. Journal of Social Work Practice, 35(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2020.1834371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Act on Disability Services and Assistance. (1987). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1987/19870380
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Järvinen, M. (2014). Troubles, problems, and clientization. In J. F. Gubrium, & M. Järvinen (Eds.), Turning troubles into problems. Clientization in human services (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harjula, M. (2023). Framing the client’s agency: Generational layers of lived social work in Finland 1940-2000. In P. Haapala, M. Harjula, & H. Kokko (Eds.), Experiencing society and the lived welfare state. Palgrave studies in the history of experience (pp. 149–177). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hingley-Jones, H., & Ruch, G. (2016). “Stumbling through?”: relationship-based social work practice in austere times. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2016.1215975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (1998). Relationship-based thinking and practice in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650539808415131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, E., Morgan, H., & Mitchell, R. (2017). Named social workers – better social work for learning disabled people? Disability & Society, 32(10), 1650–1655. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1340019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen, E., Rantanen, T., & Toikko, T. (2023). Meanings of client-employee relationships in social work: Clients’ perspectives on desisting from crime. Nordic Social Work Research, 13(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1981984
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M., Young, M., & Zuern, E. (2018). Character work in social movements. Theory and Society, 47(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9310-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhila, K. (2003). Creating a “bad” client: Disalignment of institutional identities in social work interaction. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, N. Parton, & T. Pösö (Eds.), Constructing clienthood in social work and human services (pp. 83–95). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Ranta, J., Raitakari, S., & Banks, S. (2020). Relational autonomy and service choices in social worker–client conversations in an outpatient clinic for people using drugs. British Journal of Social Work, 51(1), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivistö, M., & Lindh, J. (2024). Relational discretion in social work with persons with disabilities. Intersecting relations of juridical, professional and organizational discourse. Nordic Social Work Research. Online first https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2023.2300039
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in the public services (30th anniversary expanded edition). Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, H. E., & Shardlow, S. M. (2022). The construction of character in social work narratives of practice with undocumented migrants. British Journal of Social Work, 52(8), 5054–5065. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, L., & Rogowski, S. (2023). Troubled and troublesome teenagers: Towards critical and relationship-based practice. British Journal of Social Work, 53(7), 3419–3435. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. (2009). What's in a name: ‘client’, ‘patient’, ‘customer’, ‘consumer’, ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user’—what's next? The British Journal of Social Work, 39(6), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N., & Haugaard, M. (2020). Performance of agency in real-life encounters: Turning unequal power and structural constraint into collaboration. Symbolic Interaction, 44(3), 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, N., & Silverman, D. (2019). Agency and clientship in public encounters: Co-constructing ‘neediness’ and ‘worthiness’ in shelter placement meetings. British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 1640–1660. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulcová, K., Richterová, B., Kowaliková, I., & Kubíčková, H. (2024). The construction of unmotivated client as a tool for solving the dilemma between control and reflexive approaches of social workers working with vulnerable children in Czech republic. European Journal of Social Work, 27(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2266586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykänen, H. (2021). ‘Between a rock and a hard place’: Challenging encounters between disability services clients and workers. Communication Research and Practice, 7(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.2006114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N., & O’Byrne, P. (2000). What do we mean by constructive social work? [Online]. Critical Social Work, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350363397
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K., & Quinney, L. (2005). Narrative in social work. A critical review. Qualitative Social Work, 4(4), 391–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058643
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, W. (2019). Social worker – client relationships: Social worker perspectives. Australian Social Work, 73(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2019.1669687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozario, P. (2011). “He Was your father, He raised You”: Examining helping professionals’ narratives on filial piety in Singapore. Qualitative Social Work, 11(6), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/147332501141300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2010). The contemporary context of relationship-based practice. In G. Ruch, D. Turney, & A. Ward (Eds.), Relationship-based social work: Getting to heart of practice (pp. 29–45). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sinai-Glazer, H. (2020). The essentials of helping relationships between social workers and clients. Social Work, 65(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds, J., Williams, V., Miles, C., Steel, M., & Porter, S. (2018). The social care practitioners as assessor: People, relationships and professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1910–1928. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvainen, M., & Kivistö, M. (2023). Clients’ and social workers’ stories about discretion in social work with persons with disabilities. Qualitative Social Work. Online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250231214198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2012). Models for professional judgement in social work. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.702310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TENK. (2019). The Ethical Principles of Research with Human Participants and Ethical Review in the Human Sciences in Finland: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK Guidelines 2019. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TENK. (2023). The Finnish code of conduct for research integrity and procedures for handling alleged violations of research integrity in Finland 2023. Publications of the Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK 4/2023. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2023-05/RI_Guidelines_2023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2014). Humanising managerialism: Reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.926868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urek, M. (2005). Making a case in social work: The construction of an unsuitable mother. Qualitative Social Work, 4(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058646
   Google Scholar