530
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Role of Geographic Context in the Local Politics of US Immigration

References

  • Ali, A. 2007. Immigration Flashpoint: Hostilities High in Waukegan. Medill Reports Chicago, August 21. http://news.medill.northwestern.edu/chicago/news.aspx?id = 59971.
  • Berg, J. A. 2010. “Race, Class, Gender, and Social Space: Using an Intersectional Approach to Study Immigration Attitudes.” The Sociological Quarterly 51 (2): 278–302. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01172.x.
  • Cain, B., J. Citrin, and C. Wong. 2000. Ethnic Context, Race Relations, and California Politics. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
  • Ceobanu, A. M., and X. E. Escandell. 2010. “Comparative Analyses of Public Attitudes Toward Immigrants and Immigration Using Multinational Survey Data: A Review of Theories and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (1): 309–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651.
  • Chandler, C. R., and Y. Tsai. 2001. “Social Factors Influencing Immigration Attitudes: An Analysis of Data from the General Social Survey.” The Social Science Journal 38 (2): 177–188. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(01)00106-9.
  • Chavez, J. M., and D. M. Provine. 2009. “Race and the Response of State Legislatures to Unauthorized Immigrants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 623 (1): 78–92. doi:10.1177/0002716208331014.
  • Chi, G., and P. Voss. 2005. “Migration Decision-making: A Hierarchical Regression Approach.” The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy 35 (2): 11–22. http://www.jrap-journal.org/pastvolumes/2000/v35/F35-2-2.pdf.
  • Cho, S.-H. 2003. “Using Multilevel Analysis in Patient and Organizational Outcomes Research.” Nursing Research 52 (1): 61–65. doi:10.1097/00006199-200301000-00010.
  • Citrin, J., and J. Sides. 2008. “Immigration and the Imagined Community in Europe and the United States.” Political Studies 56 (1): 33–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00716.x.
  • Ellis, M. 2006. “Unsettling Immigrant Geographies: US Immigration and the Politics of Scale.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 97 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9663.2006.00495.x.
  • Espenshade, T. J., and K. Hempstead. 1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes Toward US Immigration.” International Migration Review 30 (2): 535–570. doi:10.2307/2547393.
  • Fennelly, K., and C. Federico. 2008. “Rural Residence as a Determinant of Attitudes toward US Immigration Policy.” International Migration 46 (1): 151–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00440.x.
  • Frey, W. H. 2010. “Will Arizona Be America's Future?” Brookings Institution Up Front Blog. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2010/04/28-arizona-frey
  • Gang, I. N., F. L. Rivera-Batiz, and M. S. Yun. 2002. Economic Strain, Ethnic Concentration and Attitudes towards Foreigners in the European Union. Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 578. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
  • Gimpel, J. G. 1999. Separate Destinations: Migration, Immigration, and the Politics of Places. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Ha, S. E. 2010. “The Consequences of Multiracial Contexts on Public Attitudes toward Immigration.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1177/1065912908325255.
  • Hanson, G. H. 2007. The Economic Logic of Illegal Immigration. CSR No. 26. New York, NY: The Council on Foreign Relations.
  • Hardwick, S. W. 2008. “Toward a Suburban Immigrant Nation.” In Twenty-First Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America, edited by A. Singer, S. W. Hardwick, and C. B. Brettell, 31–50. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Haubert, J., and E. Fussell. 2006. “Explaining Pro-immigrant Sentiment in the US: Social Class, Cosmopolitanism, and Perceptions of Immigrants.” International Migration Review 40 (3): 489–507. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00033.x.
  • Hayes, B. C., and L. Dowds. 2006. “Social Contact, Cultural Marginality, or Economic Self-Interest? Attitudes towards Immigrants in Northern Ireland.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32 (3): 455–476. doi:10.1080/13691830600554890.
  • Hjerm, M. 2009. “Anti-immigrant Attitudes and Cross-municipal Variation in the Proportion of Immigrants.” Acta Sociologica 52 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1177/0001699308100633.
  • Holzer, H. J. 2011. Immigration Policy and Less-skilled Workers in the United States: Reflections on Future Directions for Reform. Ann Arbor, MI: National Poverty Center Working Paper Series #11-01.
  • Hood, M. V., and I. L. Morris. 1997. “Amigo o Enemigo?: Context, Attitudes, and Anglo Public Opinion toward Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 78 (2): 309–323.
  • Hopkins, D. J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 40–60. doi:10.1017/S0003055409990360.
  • Kessler, A. 2001. Immigration, Economic Insecurity, and the ‘Ambivalent’ American Public. La Jolla, CA: The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies Working Paper Series, Working Paper 41.
  • Key, V. O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
  • Kohut, A., S. Keeter, C. Doherty, R. Suro, and G. Escobar. 2006. America's Immigration Quandary: No Consensus on Immigration Problem or Proposed Fixes. Washington, DC: The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press and the Pew Hispanic Center.
  • Mayda, A. M. 2006. “Who is Against Immigration? A Cross-country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (3): 510–530. doi:10.1162/rest.88.3.510.
  • Nelson, P. B. 2005. “Migration and the Regional Redistribution of Nonearnings Income in the United States: Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Perspectives from 1975 to 2000.” Environment and Planning A 37: 1613–1636. doi:10.1068/a37170.
  • O'Rourke, K. H., and R. Sinnott. 2006. “The Determinants of Individual Attitudes toward Immigration.” European Journal of Political Economy 22 (4): 838–861. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.10.005.
  • Pathak, E. B., M. L. Casper, J. P. Tanner, S. Reader, and B. Ward. 2010. “A Multilevel Analysis of Absence of Transport to a Hospital before Premature Cardiac Death.” Preventing Chronic Disease 7 (3): 1–11. http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2010/may/pdf/09_0059.pdf.
  • Pellegrini, P. A., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1999. “Intermetropolitan Migration and Hierarchical Destination Choice: A Disaggregate Analysis from the US Public Use Microdata Samples.” Environment and Planning A 31 (6): 1093–1118. doi:10.1068/a311093.
  • Pettigrew, T. F., and L. R. Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.
  • Porter, M. 2010. “The Rent Gap at the Metropolitan Scale: New York City's Land-value Valleys, 1990-2006.” Urban Geography 31 (3): 385–405. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.31.3.385.
  • Ramakrishnan, K., and T. K. Wong. 2010. “Partisanship, not Spanish: Explaining Local Ordinances Affecting Undocumented Immigrants.” In Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in US Cities and States, edited by M. W. Varsanyi, 73–96. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., A. S. Bryk, and R. Congdon. 2009. HLM 6.07 for Windows [Computer Software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Rocha, R. R., T. Longoria, R. D. Wrinkle, B. R. Knoll, J. L. Polinard, and J. Wenzel. 2011. “Ethnic Context and Immigration Policy Preferences among Latinos and Anglos.” Social Science Quarterly 92 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00754.x.
  • Romero, M. 2008. “Crossing the Immigration and Race Border: A Critical Race Theory Approach to Immigration Studies.” Contemporary Justice Review 11 (1): 23–37. doi:10.1080/10282580701850371.
  • Ruggles, S., J. T. Alexander, K. Genadek, R. Goeken, M. B. Schroeder, and M. Sobek. 2010. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable Database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Rustenbach, E. 2010. “Sources of Negative Attitudes toward Immigrants in Europe: A Multi-level Analysis.” International Migration Review 44 (1): 53–77. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00798.x.
  • Scheve, K. F., and M. J. Slaughter. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–145 doi:10.1162/003465301750160108.
  • Schueth, S., and J. O'Loughlin. 2008. “Belonging to the World: Cosmopolitanism in Geographic Contexts.” Geoforum 39 (2): 926–941. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.10.002.
  • Semyonov, M., R. Raijman, and A. Gorodzeisky. 2006. “The Rise of Anti-foreigner Sentiment in European Societies, 1988-2000.” American Sociological Review 71 (3): 426–449. doi:10.1177/000312240607100304.
  • Singer, A. 2004. The Rise of New Immigrant Gateways. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Singer, A. 2008. “Twenty-first Century Gateways: An Introduction.” In Twenty-first Century Gateways: Immigrant Incorporation in Suburban America, edited by A. Singer, S.W. Hardwick, and C. B. Brettell, 3–30. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Singer, A., J. H. Wilson, and B. DeRenzis. 2009. Immigrants, Politics, and Local Response in Suburban Washington. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
  • Turque, B., and N. Stewart. 2006. “Labor Site Backlash Felt at Polls in Herndon: Three Who Supported Immigrant Center Ousted.” The Washington Post, May 3.
  • Valenty, L. O., and R. D. Sylvia. 2004. “Thresholds for Tolerance: The Impact of Racial and Ethnic Population Composition on the Vote for California Propositions 187 and 209.” The Social Science Journal 41 (3): 433–446. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2004.04.008.
  • Van Dalen, H. P., and K. Henkens. 2005. “The Rationality Behind Immigration Policy Preferences.” De Economist 153 (1): 67–83. doi:10.1007/s10645-004-7130-3.
  • Varsanyi, M. W. 2008. “Immigration Policing through the Backdoor: City Ordinances, The ‘Right to the City,’ and the Exclusion of Undocumented Day Laborers.” Urban Geography 29 (1): 29–52. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.29.1.29.
  • Varsanyi, M. W. 2011. “Neoliberalism and Nativism: Local Anti-immigrant Policy Activism and an Emerging Politics of Scale.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 295–311. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00958.x.
  • Walker, K. E. 2011. “The Geographies of Local Immigration Policies in the United States.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota.
  • Walker, K. E., and H. Leitner. 2011. “The Variegated Landscape of Local Immigration Policies in the US.” Urban Geography 32 (2): 156–178. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.2.156.
  • Wilkes, R., N. Guppy, and L. Farris. 2008. “No Thanks, We're Full’: Individual Characteristics, National Context, and Changing Attitudes toward Immigration.” International Migration Review 42 (2): 302–329. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2008.00126.x.
  • Wong, T. K. 2012. “287(g) and the Politics of Interior Immigration Control in the United States: Explaining Local Cooperation with Federal Immigration Authorities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (5): 737–756. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2012.667983.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.