Official standards and local knowledge in asylum procedures: decision-making in Germany’s asylum system

References

• BAMF/Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. 2014. Germany’s Asylum Procedure – in Detail. Responsibilities, Procedures, Statistics, Legal Consequences. Nürnberg: Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• BAMF/Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. 2016. Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2015. Asyl. Nürnberg: Federal Office for Migration and Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• Berard, Tim J. 2005. “Rethinking Practices and Structures.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2): 196–230. doi: 10.1177/0048393105275290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bohmer, Carol, and Amy Shuman. 2010. “Contradictory Discourses of Protection and Control in Transnational Asylum Law.” Journal of Legal Anthropology 1 (2): 212–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, Ralf. 2014. Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Eine Einführung in qualitative Methoden. 9th ed. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25. doi: 10.2307/202060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1994. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.2307/202032
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, Laura. 2017. “Diversity Discourses and the Articulation of Discrimination: The Case of Public Organizations.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Advance online publication 43 (10): 1644–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doornbos, Nienke. 2005. “On Being Heard in Asylum Cases Evidentiary Assessment Through Asylum Interviews.” In Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures, edited by Gregor Noll, 103–122. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier, and Carolina Kobelinsky. 2012. “Comment on juge l’asile.” Revue française de sociologie 53 (4): 657–682. doi: 10.3917/rfs.534.0657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, Chris. 1994. “Legal Anthropology, Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought.” Anthropology Today 10 (3): 9–12. doi: 10.2307/2783478
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. (1967) 2012. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Reprint, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Good, Anthony. 2007. Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Court. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, Pär Anders, Leif A. Strömwall, and Maria Hartwig. 2005. “Granting Asylum or Not? Migration Boards Personnel’s Beliefs about Deception.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 (1): 29–50. doi: 10.1080/1369183042000305672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guild, Elspeth. 2006. “The Europeanization of Europe’s Asylum Policy.” International Journal of Refugee Law 18 (3–4): 630–651. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/eel018
   Google Scholar
• Helton, Arthur C., Oscar Schlachter, Louis Henkin, and Anne F. Bayefsky. 2000. “Protecting the World’s Exiles: The Human Rights of Non-citizens.” Human Rights Quarterly 22 (1): 280–297. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2000.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, Jane, and Steven Turner. 2006. “Should Discrepant Accounts Given by Asylum Seekers Be Taken as Proof of Deceit?” Torture 16 (2): 81–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honer, Anne. 1994. “Das Explorative Interview: zur Rekonstruktion der Relevanzen von Expertinnen und anderen Leuten.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20 (3): 623–640.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, Francesca, and Samantha Velluti. 2011. “The Recast Process of the EU Asylum System: A Balancing Act Between Efficiency and Fairness.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 30: 24–62. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hdr009
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemet, Marco. 2009. “Transcribing Refugees: The Extentualization of Asylum Seekers’ Hearings in a Transidiomatic Environment.” Text & Talks 29 (5): 525–546. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2009.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemet, Marco. 2015. “Asylum and Superdiversity. The Search for Denotational Accuracy during Asylum Hearings.” Language & Communication 44: 72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, Livia. 2012. “Performing Credibility: Assessments of Asylum Claims in Swedish Migration Courts.” Retfaerd 35 (3): 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jubany, Olga. 2011. “Constructing Truths in a Culture of Disbelief.” International Sociology 26 (1): 74–94. doi: 10.1177/0268580910380978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, Christian, and Sarah Léonard. 2012. “The European Union Asylum Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme: Towards Supranational Governance in a Common Area of Protection?” Refugee Survey Quarterly 31: 1–20. doi: 10.1093/rsq/hds018
   Google Scholar
• Kreienbrink, Axel. 2013. “60 Jahre Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge im Kontext der deutschen Migrationspolitik.” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 33 (11–12): 397–448.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing.” Qualitative Sociology 37 (2): 153–171. doi: 10.1007/s11133-014-9274-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebig, Brigitte. 2007. “‘Tacit Knowledge’ und Management. Ein wissenssoziologischer Beitrag zur qualitativen Organisationskulturforschung.” In Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis, edited by Ralf Bohnsack, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann, and Arnd-Michael Nohl, 147–165. Opladen: Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Karl. 1980. Strukturen des Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Nieswand, Boris. 2017. “Towards a Theorisation of Diversity. Configurations of Person-Related Differences in the Context of Youth Welfare Practices.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Advance online publication 43 (10): 1714–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohl, Arnd-Michael. 2010. “Narrative Interview and Documentary Interpretation.” In Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research, edited by Ralf Bohnsack, Nicole Pfaff, and Wivian Weller, 197–219. Wiesbaden: VS.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, Gregor. 2005. “Introduction. In Search of EU Standards for Asylum Procedures.” In Proof, Evidentiary Assessment and Credibility in Asylum Procedures, edited by Gregor Noll, 1–23. Leiden: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Parusel, Bernd. 2015. “Solidarity and Fairness in the Common European Asylum System – Failure or Progress?” Migration Letters 12: 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst, Johanna. 2012. “Instruire la demande d’asile. Étude comparative du processus décisionnel au sein de l’administration allemande et française.” PhD diss., Université de Strasbourg and Philipps Universität Marburg.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, Thomas. 1997. “Dolmetschen als Darstellungsproblem. Eine ethnografische Studie zur Rolle der Dolmetscher in Asylanhörungen.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 26 (3): 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, Thomas. 1998. “Übergänge von Wort und Schrift: zur Genese und Gestaltung von Anhörungsprotokollen im Asylverfahren.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 20 (2): 230–265.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, Thomas. 2001. Asylgewährung. Eine ethnographische Analyse des deutschen Asylverfahrens. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
   Google Scholar
• Schittenhelm, Karin. 2015. “Asylsuchende im Blickpunkt der Behörde. Explizites und implizites Wissen in der Herstellung von Asylbescheiden in Deutschland.” Soziale Probleme 26 (2): 137–150. doi: 10.1007/s41059-015-0012-x
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Stephanie. 2012. “Also dann sind wir tatsächlich am Ende … Staatlichkeit und ihre Grenzen. Die Verwaltung der Ausreisepflicht bei ungeklärter Identität.” Master thesis, Siegen.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Stephanie, and Kristina Wottrich. 2017. “‘Ohne ’ne ordentliche Anhörung kann ich keine ordentliche Entscheidung machen … ’ Zur Organisation von Anhörungen in deutschen und schwedischen Asylbehörden.” In Asyl verwalten. Zur bürokratischen Bearbeitung eines gesellschaftlichen Problems, edited by Christian Lahusen and Stephanie Schneider, 81–115. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Dorothy E. 2001. “Texts and the Ontology of Organizations and Institutions.” Studies in Cultures, Organizations, and Societies 7: 159–198. doi: 10.1080/10245280108523557
   Google Scholar
• Staffans, Ida. 2008. “Evidentiary Standards of Inquisitorial Versus Adversarial Asylum Procedures in the Light of Harmonization.” European Public Law 14 (4): 615–641.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, Ann, and Jorge Arditi. 1994. “The New Sociology of Knowledge.” Annual Review of Sociology 20: 305–329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.20.080194.001513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Michelle, Michael Bloor, and Jane Frankland. 2007. “The Process of Sampling Recruitment: An Ethnostatistical Perspective.” Qualitative Research 7 (4): 429–446. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082300
   Google Scholar
• Thränhardt, Dietrich. 2014. “Europäische Abschottung und deutscher Asylstau: Gibt es Wege aus dem Dilemma?” ZAR. Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik 34 (5/6): 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, Federica. 2013. The Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System: A Step Forward to the Protection of Asylum Seekers? IES Working Paper 7/2013. Brussels: Institute for European Studies. Accessed May 15, 2015. www.ies.be/node/1645.
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, Dimiter, and Laura de Haan. 2013. “The Europeanization of Asylum Policy. An Assessment of the EU Impact on Asylum Applications and Recognitions Rates.” Journal of European Public Policy 20: 661–683. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.726482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2013. Beyond Proof. Credibility Assessment in EU Asylum Systems. Brussels: The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
   Google Scholar
• Wettergren, Asa, and Hanna Wikström. 2014. “Who Is a Refugee? Political Subjectivity and the Categorisation of Somali Asylum Seekers in Sweden.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 40 (4): 566–583. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.830502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, Hanna, and Thomas Johansson. 2013. “Credibility Assessments as ‘Normative Leakage’: Asylum Applications, Gender and Class.” Social Inclusion 1 (2): 92–101. doi: 10.17645/si.v1i2.115
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Stephan. 2009. “Dokumenten- und Aktenanalyse.” In Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch, 7th ed., edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst v. Kardorff, and Ines Steinke, 502–513. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar