Introduction: rethinking integration. New perspectives on adaptation and settlement in the era of super-diversity

References

• Ager, A., and A. Strang. 2008. “Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Refugee Studies 21 (2): 166–191. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fen016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthias, F. 2013. “Moving Beyond the Janus Face of Integration and Diversity Discourses: Towards an Intersectional Framing.” The Sociological Review 61 (2): 323–343. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaut, K., and M. Spotti. 2014. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Back, L. 2015. “Losing Culture or Finding Super-Diversity?” Discover Society 20, http://discoversociety.org/2015/05/05/losing-culture-or-finding-superdiversity-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Mette, and Nando Sigona. 2013. “Introduction: Ethnography, Diversity and Urban Space.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 20 (4): 347–360. doi: 10.1080/1070289X.2013.822382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W. 1992. “Acculturation and Adaptation in a New Society.” International Migration 30 (s1): 69–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1992.tb00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W. 1997. “Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation.” Applied Psychology 46 (1): 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J., W. Kim, U. Power, M. Young, and M. Bujaki. 1989. “Acculturation Attitudes in Plural Societies.” Applied Psychology 38 (2): 185–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, K. S. 2015. “Spatializing Diversities, Diversifying Spaces: Housing Experiences and Home Space Perceptions in a Migrant Hub of Istanbul.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 596–607. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2013. Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes. Vol. 18. Basingstoke: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P. 2015. “(Super)Diversity and the Migration-Social Work Nexus: A New Lens on the Field of Access and Inclusion?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 608–620. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommes, M., and E. Morawska, eds. 2009. International Migration Research: Constructions, Omissions and the Promises of Interdisciplinarity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2006. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buhr, F. 2017. “Using the City: Migrant Spatial Integration as Urban Practice.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 307–320. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341715.
   Google Scholar
• Cantle, T. 2008. Parallel Lives – The Development of Community Cohesion, 9–20. London: Smith Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, L. 2016. The Casey Review: A Review into Opportunity and Integration. London: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1996. The Information Age: The Rise of the Network Society. Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S., H. de Haas, and M. J. Miller. 2013. The Age of Migration: International Movements in the Modern World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, Stephen, Maja Korac, Ellie Vasta, and Steven Vertovec. 2003. Integration: Mapping the field. London: Home Office Report 28/03.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S., and J. Phillimore. 2013. Social Networks, Social Capital and Refugee Integration. Research Report for Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, S., and J. Phillimore. 2016. “Gender and Refugee Integration.” Journal of Social Policy. doi:10.1017/S0047279416000775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crul, M. 2015. “Super-Diversity vs Assimilation: How Complex Diversity in Majority-Minority Cities Challenges the Assumptions of Assimilation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2015.1061425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davern, M., D. Warr, C. Higgs, H. Dickinson, and J. Phillimore. 2015. Super-Diversity in Melbourne. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• EESC. 2004. Common Principles of Integration. Accessed 3 November 2016. http://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/common-basic-principles_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. 2014. “Rebuilding the Ship at Sea: Super-Diversity, Person and Conduct in Eastern Oslo.” Global Networks 15 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.1111/glob.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faist, T. 2000. The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2001. “Integration Policy and Integration Research in Western Europe.” In Citizenship Today, edited by T. Aleinikoff and D. Klusmeyer, 349–399. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2010. Integration and Nations: the Nation-state and Research on Immigrants in Western Europe. Selected Studies in International Migration and Immigrant Incorporation, Vol. 1, 371–404.
   Google Scholar
• Fomina, J. 2010. “Immigration Policy Debates and Their Significance for Multiculturalism in Britain.” Polish Sociological Review 1 (169): 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Fyvie, A., A. Ager, G. Curley, and M. Korac. 2003. Integration: Mapping the Field Volume II. Home Office Online Report, 29(03).
   Google Scholar
• Geldof, D. 2016. Super-Diversity in the Heart of Europe. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 2006. Europe in the Global Age. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N. 2003. “The Centrality of Ethnography in the Study of Transnational Migration.” In American Arrivals, edited by N. Foner, 99–128. Santa Fe: New Immigration School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick-Schiller, N. 2009. A Global Perspective on Transnational Migration. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, R. 2015. “Reflections on Super-Diversity by an Urban Anthropologist.” Super-diversity Academy, Berlin, April 8–10 (unpublished conference paper). https://www.academia.edu/12392425/_Reflections_on_Super-Diversity_by_an_Urban_Anthropologist_or_Super-diversity_So_What.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. 2015. “Social Anchoring: Immigrant Identity, Adaptation and Integration Reconnected?” Sociology. doi:10.1177/0038038515594091.
   Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Kazlowska, A. 2017. “From Connecting to Social Anchoring: Adaptation and ‘Settlement’ of Polish Migrants in the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 252–269. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymala-Moszczynska, H., and A. Trabka. 2014. “From Children of Migrants to Migrant Children.” Studia Migracyjne – Przegląd Polonijny 40 (3): 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. 2009. Moving on Together: Governments Recommitment to Refugees. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. London: Marion Boyars.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, C. undated. Multiculturalism: New Policy Responses to Diversity. Management of Social Transformations (MOST) – UNESCO. Accessed 23 September 2016. http://www.unesco.org/most/pp4.htm#note5.
   Google Scholar
• Kindler, M., V. Ratcheva, and M. Piechowska. 2015. Social Networks, Social Capital and Migrant Integration at Local Level. IRiS Working Paper Series Np. 6/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Korac, M. 2003. “Integration and How We Facilitate It: A Comparative Study of the Settlement Experiences of Refugees in Italy and the Netherlands.” Sociology 37 (1): 51–68. doi: 10.1177/0038038503037001387
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, P., and N. Glick Schiller. 2004. “Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 1002–1039. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. 2005. “The Complexity of Intersectionality.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (3): 1771–1800. doi: 10.1086/426800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, D. 2008. End of Multiculturalism: Terrorism, Integration and Human Rights. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, S., and N. Sigona. 2016. Boat Migration across the Central Meditteranean: Drivers, Experiences and Responses. (MEDMIG) Research Brief No.3 http://www.medmig.info/research-brief-03-Boat-migration-across-the-Central-Mediterranean.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F. 2017. “Legal Status Diversity: Regulating to Control and Everyday Contingencies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 287–306. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341718.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., and S. Vertovec. 2015. “Comparing super-diversity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 541–555. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, F., and S. Vertovec. 2015. “Comparing Super-Diversity.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (4): 541–555. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.980295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mestheneos, E., and E. Ioannidi. 2002. “Obstacles to refugee integration in the European Union member states.” Journal of Refugee Studies 15 (3): 304–320. doi: 10.1093/jrs/15.3.304
   Google Scholar
• Migration Observatory. 2013. West Midlands: Census Profile. Accessed 3 November 2016. http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/west-midlands-census-profile.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Escalona, F., and M. Korstanje. 2014. “How Much Mobile We Are?” Antrocom: Online Journal of Anthropology 10 (2): 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Ndhlovu, F. 2016. “A Decolonial Critique of Diaspora Identity Theories and the Notion of Super-Diversity.” Diaspora Studies 9 (1): 28–40. doi: 10.1080/09739572.2015.1088612
   Google Scholar
• Neal, S., K. Bennett, H. Jones, A. Cochrane, and G. Mohan. 2015. “Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super-Diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space.” Population, Space and Place 21 (5): 463–475. doi: 10.1002/psp.1910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONS. 2012. Ethnicity and National Identity in England and Wales: 2011. Accessed 26 September 2016. http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/culturalidentity/ethnicity/articles/ethnicityandnationalidentityinenglandandwales/2012-12-11.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, Bhikhu. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Penninx, R. 2005. “Integration of Migrants. Economic, Social, Cultural and Political Dimensions.” In The New Demographic Regime. Population Challenges and Policy Responses, edited by M. Macura, A. L. Haug and W. MacDonald, 137–152. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J. 2012. “Implementing Integration in the UK: Lessons for Integration Theory, Policy and Practice.” Policy & Politics 40 (4): 525–545. doi: 10.1332/030557312X643795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J. 2015. “Embedded Integration and Organisational Change in Housing Providers in the UK.” Social Policy and Society 16: 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S1474746415000639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., and L. Goodson. 2008. “Making a place in the global city: The relevance of indicators of integration.” Journal of Refugee Studies 21 (3): 305–325. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fen025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., L. Goodson, and J. Thornhill. 2010. Health services for migrants in Birmingham. University of Birmingham report for Healthy and Wealthy Together.
   Google Scholar
• Phillimore, J., R. Humphris, and K. Khan. 2017. “Reciprocity for New Migrant Integration: Resource Conservation, Investment and Exchange.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 215–232. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341709.
   Google Scholar
• Policy Exchange. 2015. Residential Patterns. Integration Hub. Accessed 26 September 2016. http://www.integrationhub.net/module/do-we-live-together-or-apart-residential-patterns/.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., and M. Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530: 74–96. doi: 10.1177/0002716293530001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan, T. 2011. On super-diversity. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, L. 2017. “Differentiated Embedding: Polish Migrants in London Negotiating Belonging Over Time.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 233–251. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, L., and J. Mulholland. 2015. “Embedding in Motion.” In Migrant Capital, edited by Ryan, Erel, and D’Angelo, 135–153. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schierup, C. U., P. Hansen, and S. Castles. 2006. Migration, citizenship, and the European welfare state: a European dilemma. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, J., and M. Crul. 2010. “New insights into assimilation and integration theory: Introduction to the special issue.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 33 (7): 1143–1148. doi: 10.1080/01419871003777809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepulveda, L., S. Syrett, and F. Lyon. 2011. “Population Superdiversity and New Migrant Enterprise: The Case of London.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23 (7–8): 469–497. doi: 10.1080/08985620903420211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S., and B. Cooper. 2006. Social Integration of Migrants in Europe. Oxford: COMPAS, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Spoonley, P., and A. Butcher. 2009. “Reporting Super-Diversity. The Mass Media and Immigration in New Zealand.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 30 (4): 355–372. doi: 10.1080/07256860903213638
   Google Scholar
• Strang, A. B., H. Baillot, and E. Mignard. 2017. “‘I Want to Participate’. Transition Experiences of New Refugees in Glasgow.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 197–214. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341717.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 2008. “Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter.” Progress in Human Geography 32 (3): 323–337. doi: 10.1177/0309133308089372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ecke, Yolanda. 2005. “Immigration from an Attachment Perspective.” Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal 33 (5): 467–476. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.5.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varis, P., and X. Wang. 2011. “Super-Diversity on the Internet: A Case from China.” Diversities 13 (2): 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, Steven. 2007. New Complexities of Cohesion in Britain. London: Communities and Local Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, Steven. 2007. “Super-Diversity and Its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. “Super-diversity and its implications.” Ethnic and racial studies 30 (6): 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, Steven. 2010. “Conceiving and Researching Transnationalism.” In Selected Studies in International Migration and Immigrant Incorporation, edited by M. Martinelli and J. Rath, 91–110. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2011. Migration and new diversities in global cities: comparatively conceiving, observing and visualizing diversification in urban public spaces. Retrieved from http://www.mmg.mpg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Subsites/GlobalDiverCities/Poster/Poster_SCD_GlobalDiverCities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2015. Diversities Old and New, 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, T., G. Craig, and K. Atkin. 2013. “Addressing Ethnicity in Social Care Research.” Social Policy and Administration 47 (3): 310–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00851.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, L. B. 2017. “Flirting Diasporically: Visits ‘Home’ Facilitating Diasporic Encounters and Complex Communities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 321–340. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341716.
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, Susanne. 2013. “Commonplace Diversity and the ‘Ethos of Mixing’: Perceptions of Difference in a London Neighbourhood.” Identities 20 (4): 407–422. doi: 10.1080/1070289X.2013.822374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, Susanne. 2014. “‘Being Open, but Sometimes Closed’. Conviviality in a Super-Diverse London Neighbourhood.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (4): 392–405. doi: 10.1177/1367549413510415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. 2017. “Pathways of Settlement among Pioneer Migrants in Super-Diverse London.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 270–286. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341719.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, T. G. 2014. “Diversity, Super-Diversity, and Monolingual Language Ideology in the United States: Tolerance or Intolerance?” Review of Research in Education 38 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.3102/0091732X13511047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334. doi: 10.1111/1471-0374.00043
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Amanda. 2005. “Hope and Belonging in a Multicultural Suburb.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 26 (1–2): 171–186. doi: 10.1080/07256860500074383
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Amanda. 2010. “Sensuous Multiculturalism: Emotional Landscapes of Inter-Ethnic Living in Australian Suburbia.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36 (6): 917–937. doi: 10.1080/13691831003643355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetter, R., and M. Pearl. 2000. “The Minority Within the Minority: Refugee Community-Based Organisations in the UK and the Impact of Restrictionism on Asylum-Seekers.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 26 (4): 675–697. doi: 10.1080/713680501
   Google Scholar