Mainstreaming versus alienation: conceptualising the role of complexity in migration and diversity policymaking

References

• Amiraux, V., and P. Simon. 2006. “There Are No Minorities Here: Cultures of Scholarship and Public Debate on Immigrants and Integration in France.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47 (3–4): 191–215.
   Google Scholar
• Banting, K., and W. Kymlicka. 2006. Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., and B. D. Jones. 1991. “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.” Journal of Politics 53 (4): 1044–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Vol. 17. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., M. Fenger, and P. Scholten. 2017. Public Policy in Action: Perspectives on the Policy Process. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bertossi, C. 2011. “National Models of Integration in Europe.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (12): 1561–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertossi, C., and J. W. Duyvendak. 2009. “Beyond Models of Integration: France, the Netherlands and the Crisis of National Models.” Special Issue, Migrations Société 122: 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl, R., and A. Verweij. 2012. Measuring and Monitoring Immigrant Integration in Europe. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Blauner, R. 1964. Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bommes, M. 2010. “Migration Research in Germany: The Emergence of a Generalized Research Field in a Reluctant Immigration Country.” In National Paradigms of Migration Research, edited by Bommes and Thranhards, 127–185. Gottingen: V&R Unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2011. “Migration Control and Narratives of Steering.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 13 (1): 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, P. J. 2007. “A View from France on the Internal Complexity of National Models.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33 (6): 1003–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brug, W. V. D., G. D’Amato, D. Ruedin, and J. Berkhout. 2015. “A Framework for Studying the Politicisation of Immigration.” In The Politicisation of Migration (Vol. 5, 4–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bygnes, S., and M. Erdal. 2017. “Liquid Migration, Grounded Lives: Considerations About Future Mobility and Settlement Among Polish and Spanish Migrants in Norway.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 5 (4): 379–407.
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S. 2004. “Why Migration Policies Fail.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 27 (2): 205–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crul, M. 2016. “Super-Diversity vs. Assimilation: How Complex Diversity in Majority–Minority Cities Challenges the Assumptions of Assimilation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (1): 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaika, M., and H. De Haas. 2014. “The Globalization of Migration: Has the World Become More Migratory?” International Migration Review 48 (2): 283–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahinden, J. 2016. “A Plea for the ‘De-Migranticization’of Research on Migration and Integration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (13): 2207–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton, D. B., and S. Bass. 2009. The Challenges of Environmental Mainstreaming: Experience of Integrating Environment into Development Institutions and Decisions. London: IIeD.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (3): 433–450.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. 2017. “Pathologies of Policy Learning: What Are They and How Do They Contribute to Policy Failure?” Policy & Politics 45 (1): 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G. 2009. Fatale remedies: Over de onbedoelde gevolgen van beleid en kennis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam university press.
   Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G. 2012. “Migration Transitions in an Era of Liquid Migration.” In European Immigrations. Trends, Structures and Policy Implications, 91–106. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G. 2016. “Floating Populations, Civic Stratification and Solidarity: Comment on Will Kymlicka’s Article: ‘Solidarity in Diverse Societies’.” Comparative Migration Studies 4 (1): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Entzinger, H. 2006. “Changing the Rules While the Game Is on; from Multiculturalism to Assimilation in the Netherlands.” In Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos, 121–144. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fassmann, H., U. Reeger, and W. Sievers. 2009. Statistics and Reality: Concepts and Measurements of Migration in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2003. “Integration Nations: The Nation-State and Research on Immigrants in Western Europe.” Comparative Social Research 22: 13–42.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. 1995. “Modes of Immigration Politics in Liberal Democratic States.” International Migration Review 29 (4): 881–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., and P. Scholten. 2016. The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R., and S. Rihani. 2012. Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to 21st Century Politics, Policy and Society. Amsterdam: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glick-Schiller, N., A. Çaglar, and T. Guldbrandsen. 2006. “Beyond the Ethnic Lens: Locality, Globality, and Born-Again Incorporation.” American Ethnologist 33 (4): 612–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. 1990. The Paradigm Dialog. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. 1997. Policy Change Behind Gilded Doors: Explaining the Evolution of Aliens’ Rights in France, Germany and the Netherlands, 1974–94. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V., and G. Lahav. 2000. “ A Reappraisal of the State Sovereignty Debate: The Case of Migration Control .” Comparative Political Studies 33 (2): 163–195.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V., and G. Lahav. 2013. Immigration Policy in Europe: The Politics of Control.
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W., and R. Hoppe. 2005. “Science/Policy Boundaries: A Changing Division of Labour in Dutch Expert Policy Advice.” In Democratization of Expertise?, edited by Maasen and Weingart, 135–151. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, J. 2013. The Politics of Immigration: Contradictions of the Liberal State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. T. 2017. Understanding Policy Fiascoes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hollinger, D. A. 2006. Postethnic America: Beyond Multiculturalism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. 2011. The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering and Participation. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• IOM. 2017. World Migration Report 2018. https://www.iom.int/wmr/world-migration-report-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1997. “The Governance of Complexity and the Complexity of Governance: Preliminary Remarks on Some Problems and Limits of Economic Guidance.” In Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity, 95–128. Lancaster: Lancaster University. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Jessop-Governance-of-Complexity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D., and L. Webster. 2006. A Handbook on Mainstreaming Disability. London: Denpasar.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., and J. F. Koppenjan. 2014. “Complexity in Governance Network Theory.” Complexity, Governance & Networks 1 (1): 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., and E. H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2015. “Solidarity in Diverse Societies: Beyond Neoliberal Multiculturalism and Welfare Chauvinism.” Comparative Migration Studies 3 (1): 17.
   Google Scholar
• Laczko, F. 2010. “Migration, the Environment and Climate Change: Assessing the Evidence.” In Migration, the Environment and Climate Change: Assessing the Evidence. Geneva: IOM.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, E., and P. Meier. 2006. “Gender Mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a Feminist Reading?” European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (2): 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process: New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martiniello, M. 2005. Political Participation, Mobilisation and Representation of Immigrants and their Offspring in Europe. Malmo: Willy Brandt Series of Working Papers in International Migration and Ethnic Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1844. “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts.” In Early Writings, edited by Dirk Struik. 333. Moscos: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, L., and M. Giugni. 2016. Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe: Making Multicultural Democracy Work? Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2018. “Three Decades of Populist Radical Right Parties in Western Europe: So What?” European Journal of Political Research 52 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, F., A. Campbell, and E. Foster. 2012. “Environmental Mainstreaming: The Organisational Challenges of Policy Integration.” Public Administration and Development 32 (3): 262–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2011. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. 1995. “Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity.” Global Modernities 2: 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2013. “The Imagination of ‘Society’ in Measurements of Immigrant Integration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1142–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2017. Imagined Societies: A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2018. “Against ‘Immigrant Integration’: For an End to Neocolonial Knowledge Production.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (1): 31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1993. “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P. 2016. “Between National Models and Multi-level Decoupling: The Pursuit of Multi-level Governance in Dutch and UK Policies Towards Migrant Incorporation.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 17 (4): 973–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholten, P., H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, and S. Verbeek. 2015. Integrating Immigrants in Europe. Research-Policy Dialogues. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P., and I. Van Breugel. 2017. Mainstreaming Integration Governance: New Trends in Migrant Integration Policies in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., and M. Rein. 1995. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seeman, M. 1959. “On the Meaning of Alienation.” American Sociological Review 24: 783–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, P., V. Piché, and A. A. Gagnon. 2015. Social Statistics and Ethnic Diversity. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. 2011. The Migration Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. 2017. “Multi-Level Governance of an Intractable Policy Problem: Migrants with Irregular Status in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (6): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R., and E.-H. Klijn. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Management: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J., and M. Mintrom. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 27–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., V. Bekkers, and B. Steijn. 2009. “Policy Alienation of Public Professionals: Application in a New Public Management Context.” Public Management Review 11 (5): 685–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. “Super-Diversity and Its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, M., and M. Thompson. 2006. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P., C. H. Weiss, B. Wittrock, and H. Wollman. 1991. Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. (Vol. 9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (3): 321–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., and N. Glick-Schiller. 2003. “Methodological Nationalism, the Social Sciences, and the Study of Migration: An Essay in Historical Epistemology.” International Migration Review 37 (3): 576–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R. 2015. Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Barrero, R. 2017. “The Intercultural Turn in Europe: Process of Policy Paradigm Change and Formation.” In The Promise and Challenge of Intercultural Dialogue: From Theory to Policy and Practice, edited by Mansouri, 13–22. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar