Regional ethnic concentrations and ethnic discrimination in hiring: field experimental evidence from the Netherlands

References

• Allport, Gordon Willard. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Andriessen, Iris, Justin Hoegen Dijkhof, Ab van der Torre, Esther van den Berg, Ine Pulles, Jurjen Iedema, and Marian De Voogd-Hamelink. 2020. Ervaren Discriminatie in Nederland II. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, Marianne, and Esther Duflo. 2017. “Field Experiments on Discrimination.” In Handbook of Economic Field Experiments, edited by A. Banerjee, and E. Duflo, 309–393. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Bessudnov, Alexey, and Andrey Shcherbak. 2020. “Ethnic Hierarchy in the Russian Labour Market: A Field Experiment.” European Sociological Review 36 (1): 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, Lieselotte. 2013. Are Joris and Renske More Employable than Rashid and Samira? A Study on the Prevalence and Sources of Ethnic Discrimination in Recruitment in the Netherlands Using Experimental and Survey Data. Utrecht: Utrecht University | ICS-dissertation series.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1958. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” The Pacific Sociological Review 1 (1): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, Mark, Meike Bokhorst, Roel Jennissen, and Godfried Engbersen. 2016. Migratie En Classificatie: Naar Een Meervoudig Migratie-Idioom. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR).
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Magnus, and Stefan Eriksson. 2017. “Do Attitudes Expressed in Surveys Predict Ethnic Discrimination?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (10): 1739–1757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Magnus, and Dan Olof Rooth. 2012. “Revealing Taste-Based Discrimination in Hiring: A Correspondence Testing Experiment with Geographic Variation.” Applied Economics Letters 19: 1861–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2018. Special Eurobarometer 469: Integration of Immigrants in the European Union (October 2017). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Di Stasio, Valentina, Bram Lancee, Susanne Veit, and Ruta Yemane. 2021. “Muslim by Default or Religious Discrimination? Results from a Cross-National Field Experiment on Hiring Discrimination.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (6): 1305–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, Christian, Kristine Vasiljeva, and Anna Piil Damm. 2019. “Refugee Migration and Electoral Outcomes.” Review of Economic Studies 86 (5): 2035–2091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enos, Ryan D. 2014. “Causal Effect of Intergroup Contact on Exclusionary Attitudes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (10): 3699–3704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “NUTS - Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics - Background.” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, S. Michael. 2018. Audit Studies: Behind the Scenes with Theory, Method, and Nuance. Los Angeles: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Seth K., and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2020. “Past Place, Present Prejudice: The Impact of Adolescent Racial Context on White Racial Attitudes.” The Journal of Politics 82 (2): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, and Dominik Hangartner. 2013. “Who Gets a Swiss Passport? A Natural Experiment in Immigrant Discrimination.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 159–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, and Daniel J. Hopkins. 2014. “Public Attitudes Toward Immigration.” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 225–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hangartner, Dominik, Elias Dinas, Moritz Marbach, Konstantinos Matakos, and Dimitrios Xefteris. 2019. “Does Exposure to the Refugee Crisis Make Natives More Hostile?” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 442–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Daniel J. 2010. “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review 104 (1): 40–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijnk, Willem, and Iris Andriessen. 2016. Integratie in Zicht? De Integratie van Migranten in Nederland Op Acht Terreinen Nader Bekeken. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Jennissen, Roel, Godfried Engbersen, Meike Bokhorst, and Mark Bovens. 2018. De Nieuwe Verscheidenheid: Toenemende Diversiteit Naar Herkomst in Nederland. Den Haag: Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid (WRR).
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, Eric, and Matthew J. Goodwin. 2018. “The Diversity Wave: A Meta-Analysis of the Native-Born White Response to Ethnic Diversity.” Social Science Research 76 (November): 120–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, Susanne Veit, and Ruta Yemane. 2019. “Taste or Statistics? A Correspondence Study of Ethnic, Racial and Religious Labour Market Discrimination in Germany.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (16): 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancee, Bram. 2021. “Ethnic Discrimination in Hiring: Comparing Groups Across Contexts. Results from a Cross-National Field Experiment.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (6): 1181–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancee, Bram, Gunn Elisabeth Birkelund, Marcel Coenders, Valentina Di Stasio, Mariña Fernández Reino, Anthony F. Heath, Ruud Koopmans, et al. 2019a. The GEMM Study: A Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment on Labour Market Discrimination: Codebook. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, University of Oslo, University of Utrecht, Charles III University of Madrid, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Lancee, Bram, Gunn Elisabeth Birkelund, Marcel Coenders, Valentina Di Stasio, Mariña Fernández Reino, Anthony F. Heath, Ruud Koopmans, et al. 2019b. The GEMM Study: A Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment on Labour Market Discrimination: Technical Report. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, University of Oslo, University of Utrecht, Charles III University of Madrid, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Edvard N. 2020. “Induced Competition in Matched Correspondence Tests: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 65: 100475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, James. 2014. “Reconciling the Contact and Threat Hypotheses: Does Ethnic Diversity Strengthen or Weaken Community Inter-Ethnic Relations?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (8): 1328–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, James, Katharina Schmid, James R. Rae, and Miles Hewstone. 2019. “Prejudice, Contact, and Threat at the Diversity Segregation Nexus: A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of How Ethnic Out-Group Size and Segregation Interrelate for Inter-Group Relations.” Social Forces 97 (3): 1029–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Rahsaan. 2019. “Cosmopolitan Immigration Attitudes in Large European Cities: Contextual or Compositional Effects?” American Political Science Review 113 (2): 456–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. Matthew, Robert S. Horton, Jack L. Vevea, Martyna Citkowicz, and Elissa A. Lauber. 2017. “A Re-Examination of the Mere Exposure Effect: The Influence of Repeated Exposure on Recognition, Familiarity, and Liking.” Psychological Bulletin 143 (5): 459–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, Carina. 2010. “Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It.” European Sociological Review 26 (1): 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Benjamin J. 2013. “Acculturating Contexts and Anglo Opposition to Immigration in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 374–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreopoulos, Philip. 2011. “Why Do Skilled Immigrants Struggle in the Labor Market? A Field Experiment with Thirteen Thousand Resumes.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3 (4): 148–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paluck, Elizabeth Levy, Seth A. Green, and Donald P. Green. 2019. “The Contact Hypothesis Re-Evaluated.” Behavioural Public Policy 3 (2): 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Robert E., and Ernest W. Burgess. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, Thomas F., and Linda R. Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEW. 2017. Interactive Data Table: World Muslim Population by Country. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, Alejandro, and Rubén Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkely: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pottie-Sherman, Yolande, and Rima Wilkes. 2017. “Does Size Really Matter? On the Relationship Between Immigrant Group Size and Anti-Immigrant Prejudice.” International Migration Review 51 (1): 218–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillian, Lincoln. 1996. “Group Threat and Regional Change in Attitudes Toward African-Americans.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (3): 816–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, Miguel R., Matthew R. Bennett, Douglas S. Massey, and Miles Hewstone. 2019. “Humans Adapt to Social Diversity Over Time.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116 (25): 12244–12249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riek, Blake M., Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner. 2006. “Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 10 (4): 336–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelkoul, Michael, Peer Scheepers, Jochem Tolsma, and Louk Hagendoorn. 2011. “Anti-Muslim Attitudes in the Netherlands: Tests of Contradictory Hypotheses Derived from Ethnic Competition Theory and Intergroup Contact Theory.” European Sociological Review 27 (6): 741–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer, Paul. 2011. Immigrant Nations. London: Cambridge Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlueter, Elmar, and Peer Scheepers. 2010. “The Relationship Between Outgroup Size and Anti-Outgroup Attitudes: A Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Test of Group Threat- and Intergroup Contact Theory.” Social Science Research 39 (2): 285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Silke L. 2008. “Anti-Immigrant Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived Ethnic Threat.” European Sociological Review 24 (1): 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, Tom, and Roel J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. 2015. “Kerncijfers Wijken En Buurten 2004-2015.” http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/dossiers/nederland-regionaal/cijfers/incidenteel/maatwerk/wijk-buurtstatistieken/kwb-recent/default.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands. 2017. “Banen van Werknemers Naar Woon- En Werkregio.” https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/83628NED/table?fromstatweb.
   Google Scholar
• Strabac, Zan, and Ola Listhaug. 2008. “Anti-Muslim Prejudice in Europe: A Multilevel Analysis of Survey Data from 30 Countries.” Social Science Research 37 (1): 268–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijssen, Lex, Marcel Coenders, and Bram Lancee. in press. “Ethnic Discrimination in the Dutch Labor Market: Differences Between Ethnic Minority Groups and the Role of Personal Information About Job Applicants—Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of International Migration and Integration (Published online): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Hannes. 2019. “Attitudes Towards Minorities in Times of High Immigration:A Panel Study among Young Adults in Germany.” European Sociological Review 35 (2): 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer, Doris. 2017. “Discrimination Against Migrant Job Applicants in Austria: An Experimental Study.” German Economic Review 18 (2): 237–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar