Organisational capacity and electoral gains: why majority parties nominate Roma candidates in local elections

References

• Adams, J. F., S. Merrill III, and B. Grofman. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., A. Segerberg, and C. B. Knüpfer. 2018. “The Democratic Interface: Technology, Political Organization, and Diverging Patterns of Electoral Representation.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (11): 1655–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnir, J. K. 2007. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjarnegard, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., and D. Kavanagh. 1992. The British General Election of 1992. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A. 2015. “The Politics of Fission: An Analysis of Faction Breakaways among Italian Parties (1946–2011).” British Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, K. 2011. “What is an Ethnic Party?” Party Politics 17 (2): 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., M. C. Stewart, and P. F. Whiteley. 2009. Performance Politics and the British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness. AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, W., and J.-B. Pilet. 2016. The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross-national Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dancygier, R. M. 2014. “Electoral Rules or Electoral Leverage? Explaining Muslim Representation in England.” World Politics 66 (2): 229–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darcy, R., S. Welch, and J. Clark. 1994. Women, Elections and Representation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Roma Rights Centre. 2012. “Challenges of representation: Voices on Roma politics, power and participation”.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschet, S. 2010. “The Gendered Dimensions of Rituals, Rules and Norms in the Chilean Congress.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (3): 394–407.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2014. Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2016. “Rewarding the “Traitors”? Legislative Defection and Re-election in Romania.” Party Politics 22 (4): 490–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2020. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe: Personality, Behavior and Consequences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. 2010. “The Effective Number of Parties.” Party Politics 16 (2): 171–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. M., and K. Kosiara-Pedersen. 2017. “How Campaigns Polarize the Electorate: Political Polarization as an Effect of the Minimal Effect Theory Within a Multi-party System.” Party Politics 23 (3): 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, R., and K. Janda. 1994. “An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (3): 259–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, R., and A. Tan. 2003. “Party Actors and Party Change: Does Factional Dominance Matter?” European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., and G. Rahat. 2010. Democracy Within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirano, S., and J. M. Snyder Jr. 2009. “Using Multimember District Elections to Estimate the Sources of the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 292–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. 2000. The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J. 2009. “Do Ethnic Parties Promote Minority Ethnic Conflict?” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 15 (1): 56–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, J., and B. Stewart. 2021. “Organization and the Structure of Opportunities: Understanding the Success of Ethnic Parties in Postcommunist Europe.” Party Politics 27 (1): 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B. 2016. “The Social Media Paradox Explained: Comparing Political Parties’ Facebook Strategy Versus Practice.” Social Media + Society 2 (2): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittilson, M. C. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments : Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefeldt, E. 2012. “Party and Gender in Western Europe Revisited A Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Gender-balanced Parliamentary Parties.” Party Politics 18 (2): 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. M. 2013. Why Institutions Matter. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. 2014. “How Are Things Done Around Here? Uncovering Institutional Rules and Their Gendered Effects.” Politics & Gender 10 (04): 685–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid, R. 2005. “Ethnic Cleavages and Electoral Volatility in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 38 (1): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magin, M., et al. 2017. “No TitleCampaigning in the Fourth Age of Political Communication. A Multi-Method Study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian Parties in the 2013 National Election Campaigns.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (11): 1698–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., A. España, and C. Gervasoni. 2009. “Extra System Electoral Volatility and the Vote Share of Young Parties.” Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S., and E. Zoco. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13 (2): 155–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., and D. T. Studlar. 2004. “Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-national Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (01): 87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R., and M. M. Taylor. 1997. “Electoral System Effects on Women’s Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 30 (2): 186–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgarry, A. 2010. Who Speaks for Roma? London: The Continuum International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgarry, A. 2014. “Roma as a Political Identity: Exploring Representations of Roma in Europe.” Ethnicities 14 (6): 756–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSwiney, J. 2021. “Social Networks and Digital Organisation: Far Right Parties at the 2019 Australian Federal Election.” Information Communication and Society 24 (10): 1401–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. G. 1999. “Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Postcommunist States.” World Politics 51 (2): 359–384.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2006. “The Impact of Electoral Reform on Women’s Representation.” Acta Politica 41 (2): 197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and J. Lovenduski. 1993. ““If Only More Candidates Came Forward”: Supply-side Explanations of Candidate Selection in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 23 (3): 373–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and J. Lovenduski. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panebianco, A. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poguntke, T. 2002. “‘Party Organizational Linkage: Parties Without Firm Social Roots?’.” In Political Parties in the New Europe, edited by K. R. Luther and F. Müller-Rommel, 43–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabushka, A., and K. A. Shepsle. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus: Charles Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Rostas, I. 2009. “The Romani Movement in Romania: Institutionalization and (De)mobilization.” In Romani Politics in Contemporary Europe: Poverty, Ethnic Mobilization, and the Neoliberal Order, edited by N. Sigona and N. Trehan, 159–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saggar, S., and A. Geddes. 2000. “Negative and Positive Racialisation: Re-examining Ethnic Minority Political Representation in the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 26 (1): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E., P. D. Webb, and T. Poguntke. 2017. Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searing, D. D. 1991. “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.” The American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1239–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyd, P., and P. Whiteley. 2004. “British Party Members.” Party Politics 10 (4): 355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobolewska, M. 2013. “Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election.” West European Politics 36 (3): 615–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, E. 2001. “Political Representation of the Roma : Roma in Politics in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 2 (1): 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Stonecash, J. M. 2008. Reassessing the Incumbency Effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 565–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verge, T., and M. de la Fuente. 2014. “‘Playing with Different Cards: Party Politics, Gender Quotas and Women’s Empowerment’.” International Political Science Review 35 (1): 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, P. 2007. The Romani Movement : Minority Politics and Ethnic Mobilization in Contemporary Central Europe. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Volintiru, C. 2016. “Clientelism and cartelization in post-communist Europe: The case of Romania.” London: Doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Vowles, J. 2013. “Campaign Claims, Partisan Cues, and Media Effects in the 2011 British Electoral System Referendum.” Electoral Studies 32 (2): 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., J. Lefevere, and A. Tresch. 2012. “The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 771–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar