From social capital to social cohesion: Syrian refugees in Turkey and the role of NGOs as intermediaries

References

• Adler, P. S., and S. W. Kwon. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.” The Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçalı, E. 2018. “Do Popular Assemblies Contribute to Genuine Political Change? Lessons from the Park Forums in Istanbul.” South European Society and Politics 23 (3): 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akçapar-Köşer, S., and D. Şimşek. 2018. “The Politics of Syrian Refugees in Turkey: A Question of Inclusion and Exclusion Through Citizenship.” Social Inclusion 6 (1): 176–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akdemir, A. 2019. “Syrians in Turkey: A Review of Literature.” International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies 5 (1): 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, B., and Y. Duman. 2018. “I/NGOs’ Assistance to Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Opportunities and Challenges.” Journal of Balkan and Near East Studies 21 (4): 478–491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2018.1530382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baban, F., S. Ilcan, and K. Rygiel. 2017. “Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Pathways to Precarity, Differential Inclusion, and Negotiated Citizenship Rights.” Journal of Ethnic Migration Studies 43 (1): 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, K. S. 2017. “Inclusive Exclusion? The Regulation and Experience of Citizenship in a Space of Irregular Migration in Istanbul.” In Within and Beyond Citizenship, edited by R. G. Gonzales, and N. Sigona (Der.), 80–92. Londra ve New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpiano, R. 2005. “Toward a Neighborhood Resource-Based Theory of Social Capital for Health: Can Bourdieu and Sociology Help?” Social Science & Medicine 62 (1): 165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catarci, M., Gomes, M. P., and Sávio Siqueira. (2020). Refugees, Interculturalism and Education. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, C., and S. Erdoğan. 2017. How to Organize Schools for Integration of Syrian Children in Turkey: Constructing Inclusive and Intercultural Institutional Habitus in Schools.” Mirekoc Policy Brief Series.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, T. 2018. “Functions of social capital – bonding, bridging, linking.” Social Capital Research. https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/what-is-bridging-social-capital/.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (S1): S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Berry, J. P., and A. Roberts. 2018. Social Cohesion and Forced Displacement: A Desk Review to Inform Programming and Project Design.” The World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/125521531981681035/pdf/128640-WP-P163402-PUBLIC-SocialCohesionandForcedDisplacement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Demireva, N. 2017. Immigration, Diversity and Social Cohesion. Briefing, The Migration Observatory, University of Oxford. https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Briefing-Immigration-Diversity-and-Social-Cohesion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate General of Migration Management. 2021. “Geçici Koruma.” https://www.goc.gov.tr/gecici-koruma5638.
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, N., R. Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, E. A. Bekaroğlu, and M. Cin. 2020. IBB Goc Arastirmasi.” https://www.ibb.istanbul/Uploads/2021/5/istanbul-Goc-Arastirmasi-2020-05-06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Easton-Calabria, E., and J. Wood. 2020. “Bridging, Bonding, and Linking? Syrian Refugee-led Organisations and Integration in Berlin.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (19): 4308–4326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1788928.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, B. 2017. “Geçici koruma statüsündeki Suriyelilerin sosyal, siyasi ve vatandaşlık hukuku bakımından Türkiye’deki durumları.” Public and Private International Law Bulletin 37 (2): 332–351.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. M. 2015. Türkiye’deki Suriyeliler: Toplumsal kabul ve uyum. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. M. 2016. “Syrians in Turkey: From Emergency Aid Policies to Integration Policies.” Foreign Policy 42 (2): 25–56.
   Google Scholar
• Erdoğan, M. M. 2020. Syrians Barometer 2019: A Framework for Achieving Social Cohesion with Syrians In Turkey. Ankara: Orion.
   Google Scholar
• Eslen-Ziya, H., and N. Kazanoğlu. 2020. “De-democratization under the NewTurkey? Challenges for women’s organizations.” Mediterranean Politics 27 (1): 101–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2020.1765524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “EU Signs Final Contracts Under the €6 Billion Budget of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey.” https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/news_corner/news/eu-signs-final-contracts-under-€6-billion-budget-facility-refugees-turkey_en.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, K. L., S. C. Quinn, R. M. Goodman, J. Butler, and J. Wallace. 2013. “A Meta-Analysis of Social Capital and Health: A Case for Needed Research.” Journal of Health Psychology 18 (11): 1385–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell, R. J., and A. Vidal. 1998. Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Göksel, G. U. 2014. The Theory of Recognition and The Integration of Immigrants. PhD thesis. University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. L., and K. Maurer. 2010. “Bonding Bridging and Linking: How Social Capital Operated in New Orleans following Katrina.” British Journal of Social Work 40: 1777–1793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heper, M., and S. Yıldırım. 2011. “Revisiting Civil Society in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 11 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A. 2016. Turkey: Labour Market Integration and Social Inclusion of Refugees. Brussels: Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy.
   Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A., and E. Diker. 2017. “Labor Market Integration of Syrian Refugees: From Refugees to Settlers.” The Journal of Migration Studies 3 (1): 12–35.
   Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A., and D. Şimşek. 2016. “Syrian Refugees in Turkey: Towards Integration Policies.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 15 (3): 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İGAMDER. 2013. Report on the Activities of Non Governmental Organisations for Syrian Refugees in Turkey. Ankara: İltica ve Göç Araştırmaları Merkezi- İGAM. https://igamder.org/uploads/belgeler/IGAMSuriyeSTK2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ilcan, S., K. Rygiel, and F. Baban. 2018. “The Ambigous Architecture of Precarity: Temporary Protection, Everyday Living, and Migrant Journeys of Syrian Refugees.” International Journal of Migration and Bordres 4 (1/2): 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• INGEV. 2019. Syrian Perception Research and Invitation from İNGEV to Use Social Cohesion Language Against the Danger of Othering and Antagonising.” Press Bulletin. https://ingev.org/press-bulletin/Syrian-Perception-Research.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2018. Turkey’s Syrian Refugees: Defusing Metropolitan Tensions. Europe Report No. 248. Belgium: International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kadkoy, O. 2020. “Syrian Entrepreneurs in Turkey: Emerging Economic Actors and Agents of Social Cohesion.” In Turkey’s Political Economy in the 21st Century, edited by E. D. Parlar, 115–129. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, A. 2002. Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landell Mills. 2021. Strategic Mid-Term Evaluation of the Facility for Refugges in Turkey 2016-2019/2020. Final Report Volume 1. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/strategic_mid-term_evaluation_main_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levent, F., and S. Çayak. 2017. “Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Öğrencilerin Eğitimine Yönelik Okul Yöneticilerinin Görüşleri.” Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14 (1): 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Erik, E. Amnå, P. Brundin, and E. Bozzini. 2011. “European Civil Societies and the Promotion of Integration, Leading Practices from Sweden, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Italy.” In Social Rights, Active Citizenship and Governance in the European Union, edited by T. P. Boje, and M. Potucek, 121–133. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Mavi Kalem. 2014. “Suriyeli Mülteciler Alanında Sivil Toplum” Çalıştayı Raporu. http://mavikalem.org/wp-content/uploads/Suriyeli-M%C3%BClteciler-Alan%C4%B1nda-ST%C3%96ler-%C3%87al%C4%B1%C5%9Ftay%C4%B1-Raporu_28.05.2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, D. 2000. Voices of the Poor. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okyay, A. S. 2017. “Labour Marker Integration of Syrian Refugees in Germany and Turkey: Challenges and prospects.” Global Turkey in Europe Working Paper 18.
   Google Scholar
• Paker, H., F. Adaman, Z. Kadirbeyoğlu, and B. Özkaynak. 2013. “Environmental Organisations in Turkey: Engaging the State and Capital.” Environmental Politics 22 (5): 760–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. 2002. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” American Sociological Review 67 (2): 254–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelling, M., and C. High. 2005. “Understanding Adaptation: What Can Social Capital Offer Assessments of Adaptive Capacity?” Global Environmental Change 15 (4): 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Ramazanoğulları, H. 2021. “After the Protest: Istanbul Park Forums and People’s Engagement in Political Action.” Social Movement Studies: 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1894550.
   Google Scholar
• Rottmann, S. B. 2020. “Integration: Policies, Practices and Experiences – Turkey Country Report,” RESPOND - Multilevel Governance of Mass Migration in Europe and Beyond Project (#770564, Horizon2020) Working Paper Series. https://www.respondmigration.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Rottmann, S. B. 2021. “Geçici Koruma Altındaki Kişilerin Entegrasyonu.” In Koruma, Kabul ve Entegrasyon: Türkiye’de Mültecilik, edited by Ayhan Kaya, Susan Beth Rottmann, N. Ela Gökalp Aras, and Zeynep Şahin Mengücek, 191–205. Istanbul: İstanbul University Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, T. 2007. “Reflections on the use of Social Capital.” Review of Social Economy 65 (1): 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek, D., and M. Çorabatır. 2016. “Challenges and Opportunities of Refugee Integration in Turkey.” Research Centre on Asylum and Migration (IGAM). https://tr.boell.org/sites/default/files/hb_rapor_duezlt_1904173.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L. 2010. “Social Capital and Psychological Distress.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52 (4): 478–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soykan, C. 2012. The New Draft Law on Foreigners and International Protection in Turkey. Oxford Monitor of Forced Migration 2 (2): 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, W., and J. Hughes. 2002. “Social Capital: Empirical Meaning and Measurement Validity.” Australian Institute of Family Studies. Research Paper No 27.
   Google Scholar
• Sunata, U., and S. Tosun. 2019. “Assessing the Civil Society’s Role in Refugee Integration in Turkey: NGO-R as a New Typology.” Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (4): 683–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szreter, S., and M. Woolcock. 2004. “Health by Association? Social Capital, Social Theory, and the Political Economy of Public Health.” International Journal of Epidemiology 33 (4): 650–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, N. F. 2020. A Study on the Potential for Introducing A Community Sponsorship Program for Refugees in Sweden.” UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/neu/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2020/12/UNHCR-Study-on-Community-Sponsorship-Program-in-Sweden.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tunç, AŞ. 2015. “Mülteci Davranışı ve Toplumsal Etkileri: Türkiye’deki Suriyelilere İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme.” TESAM Akademik Dergisi 2 (2): 29–63.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2020. 3RP Turkey Country Chapter 2020–2021. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/74179.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2021, June. “UNHCR Turkey Operational Update.” https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/details/87641.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M. 1998. “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Frame- Work.” Theory and Society 27: 151–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M., and D. Narayan. 2000. “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” World Bank Research Observer 15 (2): 225–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. “Turkey’s Response to the Syrian Refugee Crisis and the Road Ahead.” https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/23548/Turkey0s0respo0s0and0the0road0ahead.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• World Food Programme. 2020. Social Cohesion in Turkey: refugees and the host community.” July 2020. https://reliefweb.int/report/turkey/social-cohesion-turkey-refugees-and-host-community-online-survey-findings-rounds-1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Zetter, R., D. Griffiths, N. Sigona, D. Flynn, P. Tauhid, and R. Beynon. 2006. Immigration, Social Cohesion, and Social Capital: What are the Links? London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Zihnioğlu, Ö. 2019. “The Prospects of Civic Alliance: New Civic Activists Acting Together with Civil Society Organizations.” Voluntas 30(2): 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihnioğlu, Ö. 2020. EU-Turkey Relations: Civil Society and Depoliticization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar