The burkini in German legal discourse: individualised integration, belonging, and the role of the state

References

• Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2013. Do Muslim Women Need Saving? Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt6wpmnc.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Aziza. 2020. “The Gender of Islamophobia.” In Islamophobia and the Law, edited by Cyra Akila Coudhury, and Khaled A. Beydoun, 249–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108380768.018.
   Google Scholar
• Amir-Moazami, Schirin. 2011. “Dialogue as a Governmental Technique: Managing Gendered Islam in Germany.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1057/fr.2011.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, Rikke, and Doutje Lettinga. 2012. “Veiled Debates: Gender and Gender Equality in European National Narratives.” In Politics, Religion and Gender: Framing and Regulating the Veil, edited by Sieglinde Rosenberger, and Birgit Sauer, 17–36. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203181058.
   Google Scholar
• Ataç, İlker, Sieglinde Rosenberger, and Birgit Sauer. 2012. “Discursive Europeanization? Negotiating Europe in Headscarf Debates.” In Politics, Religion, and Gender: Framing and Regulating the Veil, edited by Sieglinde Rosenberger, and Birgit Sauer, 74–93. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203181058.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2019. “The Value of Revisiting and Extending Previous Studies: The Case of Islam in the UK Press.” In Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists, edited by Ronny Scholz, 215–249. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97370-8_8.
   Google Scholar
• Baldi, Giorgia. 2018. “Law & Critique: Burkini, Bikini, and the Female (Un)dressed Body.” Critical Legal Thinking, 22 June 2018. https://criticallegalthinking.com/2018/06/22/law-critique-burkini-bikini-the-female-undressed-body/.
   Google Scholar
• Baldi, Giorgia. 2021. Un-veiling Dichotomies: European Secularism and Women’s Veiling. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79297-8.
   Google Scholar
• Barb, Amandine. 2019. “The New Politics of Religious Education in the United States and Germany.” German Law Journal 20 (7): 1035–1046. doi:10.1017/glj.2019.73.
   Google Scholar
• Belwe, Katharina. 2006. “Editorial.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 1-2: 2. https://www.bpb.de/apuz/30002/parallelgesellschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Sam. 2018. Constructions of Migrant Integration in British Public Discourse: Becoming British. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Berghahn, Sabine. 2012. “Legal Regulations: Responses to the Muslim Headscarf in Europe.” In Politics, Religion and Gender: Framing and Regulating the Veil, edited by Sieglinde Rosenberger, and Birgit Sauer, 97–115. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203181058.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, Jan, and Chris Bulcaen. 2000. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 447–466. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang. 2009. “Bekenntnisfreiheit in einer pluralen Gesellschaft und die Neutralitätspflicht des Staates.” In Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, edited by Petra Rostock, and Sabine Berghahn, 175–192. Bielefeld: Transcript. doi:10.1515/9783839409596.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge [BAMF]. 2018. Aktuelle Zahlen zu Asyl. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat [BMI]. 2021a. “Körperschaftsstatus.” https://www.bmi.bund.de/DE/themen/heimat-integration/staat-und-religion/koerperschaftsstatus/koerperschaftsstatus-artikel.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat [BMI]. 2021b. “Lexicon.” https://www.bmi.bund.de/DE/service/lexikon/lexikon-node.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat [BMI]. 2021c. “Religions- und Weltanschauungsgemeinschaften.” https://www.personenstandsrecht.de/Webs/PERS/DE/informationen/religionsgemeinschaften/religionsgemeinschaften-node.html.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Peter C. 1996. “The Crucifix and German Constitutional Culture.” Cultural Anthropology 11 (2): 259–273. doi:10.1525/can.1996.11.2.02a00050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro Varela, María do Mar, and Nikita Dhawan. 2016. “Die Migrantin retten!? Zum vertrackten Verhältnis von Geschlechtergewalt, Rassismus und Handlungsmacht.” Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 41: 13–28. doi:10.1007/s11614-016-0237-3.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Le, and David Machin. 2022. “The Law and Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies. Advance Online Publication, doi:10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520.
   Google Scholar
• Destasis. 2022. “Migrationshintergrund.” https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Migration-Integration/Glossar/migrationshintergrund.html.
   Google Scholar
• Detjen, Stephan. 2015. “Der Islam gehört zu Deutschland / Die Geschichte eines Satzes.” Deutschlandfunk, January 13, 2015. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/der-islam-gehoert-zu-deutschland-die-geschichte-eines-satzes-100.html.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, Tamar. 2021. Integration Requirements for Immigrants in Europe: A Legal-philosophical Inquiry. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, Teun A. van. 1997. “Discourse as Interaction in Society.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 1–37. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Elliot. 2021. “Muslims in Germany: Religion not a Good Gauge of Integration.” Deutsche Welle, April 28, 2021. https://p.dw.com/p/3shQi.
   Google Scholar
• El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.5749/minnesota/9780816670154.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. “Asylum and first-time asylum applicants by citizenship, age and sex. Annual aggregated data (rounded).” Luxembourg: Statistical Office of the European Communities. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset = migr_asyappctza &lang = EN.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 121–138. London: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9780857028020.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman. doi:10.4324/9781315834368.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Farris, Sara R. 2017. In the Name of Women’s Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/9780822372929.
   Google Scholar
• Goebel, Nicole. 2018. “Burkinis should be allowed in German Swim Classes, says Family Minister.” Deutsche Welle. June 25, 2018. https://p.dw.com/p/30D6N.
   Google Scholar
• Göle, Nilüfer. 2010. “European Self-Presentations and Narratives Challenged by Islam: Secular Modernity in Question.” In Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches, edited by Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Manuela Boatcă, and Sérgio Costa, 103–118. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gresch, Nora, Petra Rostock, and Sevgi Kılıç. 2012. “Negotiating Belonging: Or How a Differentiated Citizenship is Legitimized in European Headscarf Debates.” In Politics, Religion and Gender: Framing and regulating the Veil, edited by Sieglinde Rosenberger and Birgit Sauer, 55–73. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griebel, Tim, and Erik Vollmann. 2019. “We can(t) do this: A Corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of Migration in Germany.” Journal of Language and Politics 18 (5): 671–697. doi:10.1075/jlp.19006.gri.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, Kien Nghi. 2010. “Integration as Colonial Pedagogy of Postcolonial Immigrants and People of Colour: A German Case Study.” In Decolonizing European Sociology: Transdisciplinary Approaches, edited by Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Manuela Boatcă, and Sérgio Costa, 161–177. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Kien Nghi, and Markus Schmitz. 2006. “Der nationalpädagogische Impetus der deutschen Integrations(dis)kurse im Spiegel post-/kolonialer Kritik.” In Cultural Studies und Pädagogik: Kritische Artikulationen, edited by Paul Mecheril, and Monika Witsch, 225–262. Bielefeld: Transcript. doi:10.1515/9783839403662.
   Google Scholar
• Hadj Abdou, Leila. 2017. “‘Gender Nationalism’: The New (Old) Politics of Belonging.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 46 (1): 83–88. doi:10.15203/ozp.1592.vol46iss1.
   Google Scholar
• Haupt, Claudia E. 2012. Religion-state Relations in the United States and Germany: The Quest for Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139059527.
   Google Scholar
• Hertner, Isabelle. 2022. “Germany as ‘a Country of Integration’? The CDU/CSU’s Policies and Discourses on Immigration during Angela Merkel’s Chancellorship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (2): 461–481. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, Christian. 2009. Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Kılıç, Sevgi, Sawitri Saharso, and Birgit Sauer. 2008. “Introduction: The Veil: Debating Citizenship, Gender and Religious Diversity.” Social Politics. International Studies in Gender, State and Society 15 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1093/sp/jxn022.
   Google Scholar
• Klarenbeek, Lea M. 2021. “Reconceptualising ‘integration as a two-way process’.” Migration Studies 9 (3): 902–921. doi:10.1093/migration/mnz033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klusmeyer, Douglas B., and Demetrios G. Papdemetriou. 2009. Immigration Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany: Negotiating Membership and Remaking the Nation. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Korteweg, Anna C. 2017. “The Failures of ‘Immigrant Integration’: The Gendered Racialized Production of Non-belonging.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 428–444. doi:10.1093/migration/mnx025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korteweg, Anna C., and Gökçe Yurdakul. 2014. The Headscarf Debates: Conflicts of National Belonging. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer, Klaus. 2013. “Muslimischer Verein erhält Körperschaftsstatus.” Deutsche Welle. June 19, 2013. https://p.dw.com/p/18qx8.
   Google Scholar
• Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK). 2017. Basic Structure of the Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany: Diagram. Berlin: Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lewicki, Aleksandra. 2018. “Race, Islamophobia and the Politics of Citizenship in Post-Unification Germany.” Patterns of Prejudice 52 (5): 496–512. doi:10.1080/0031322X.2018.1502236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Guillem, Susana. 2018. “Race/Ethnicity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 359–371. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, Dominic. 2006. Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Tobias. 2017. “Constructing Islam and Secularism in the German Islam Conference.” In Muslims in the UK and Europe III, edited by Paul Anderson, and Julian Hargreaves, 49–62. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. http://www.cis.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Muslims-in-the-UK-and-Europe-III.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Orgad, Liav. 2009. “‘Cultural Defence’ of Nations: Cultural Citizenship in France, Germany and the Netherlands.” European Law Journal 15 (6): 719–737. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00487.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, Hartwig. 2005. “The Politics of Identity in Germany: The Leitkultur Debate.” Race & Class 46 (4): 39–52. doi:10.1177/0306396805052517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penninx, Rinus, and Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas. 2016. “The Concept of Integration as an Analytical Tool and as a Policy Concept.” In Integration Processes and Policies in Europe, edited by Blanca Garcés-Mascareñas, and Rinus Penninx, 11–29. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21674-4_2.
   Google Scholar
• Prantl, Heribert. 2010. “Alle Muslime sind verdächtig.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, May 17, 2010. www.sz.de/1.785482.
   Google Scholar
• Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riegel, Ulrich, Mirjam Zimmermann, and Oliver Hohenschue. 2020. “German Principals’ Attitude towards the Form of Religious Education at State Schools.” Journal of Religious Education 68: 397–408. doi:10.1007/s40839-020-00117-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and Birgit Sauer. 2012. Politics, Religion and Gender: Framing and Regulating the Veil. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203181058.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenow-Williams, Kerstin. 2012. Organizing Muslims and Integrating Islam in Germany: New Developments in the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004234475.
   Google Scholar
• Rostock, Petra, and Sabine Berghahn. 2009. “Einleitung: Der Stoff, aus dem die Kopftuch-Konflikte sind.” In Der Stoff, aus dem Konflikte sind: Debatten um das Kopftuch in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, edited by Petra Rostock, and Sabine Berghahn, 9–29. Bielefeld: Transcript. doi:10.1515/9783839409596.
   Google Scholar
• Rostock, Petra, and Sabine Berhahn. 2008. “The Ambivalent Role of Gender in Redefining the German Nation.” Ethnicities 8 (3): 345–364. doi:10.1177/1468796808092447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, Birgit. 2009. “Headscarf Regimes in Europe: Diversity Policies at the Intersection of Gender, Culture and Religion.” Comparative European Politics 7 (1): 75–94. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer, Birgit. 2016. “Gender and Citizenship: Governing Muslim Body Covering in Europe.” In Contemporary Encounters in Gender and Religion: European Perspectives, edited by Lena Gemzöe, Marja-Liisa Keinänen, and Avril Maddrell, 105–129. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42598-6.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, Willem. 2017. Imagined Societies: A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316424230.003.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, Willem. 2018. “Against ‘Immigrant Integration’: For an End to Neocolonial Knowledge Production.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (31): 1–17. doi:10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidtke, Oliver. 2008. “Borders in Public Perception: Renationalizing Modes of Inclusion and Exclusion.” In Of States, Rights, and Social Closure: Governing Migration and Citizenship, edited by Oliver Schmidtke, and Saime Ozcurumez, 91–110. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230610484_5.
   Google Scholar
• Shiffauer, Werner. 2006. “Enemies within the Gates: The Debate about the Citizenship of Muslims in Germany.” In Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach, edited by Tariq Modood, Anna Triandafyllidou, and Ricard Zapata-Barrero, 94–116. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, Alfred. 2011. “The Multiple Secularisms of Modern Democratic and Non-democratic Regimes.” In Rethinking Secularism, edited by Craig Calhoun, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 114–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Adam. 2016. “The surprising Australian origin story of the ‘burkini.’” Washington Post, August 17, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/08/17/the-surprising-australian-origin-story-of-the-burkini/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Jennifer. 2020. “Gender and Nationalism.” Nationalities Papers 48: 3–11. doi:10.1017/nps.2019.98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakulenko, Anastasia. 2012. Islamic Veiling in Legal Discourse. Oxford: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203117590.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth. 2011. “Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discursive Pragmatics, edited by Jan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 50–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/hoph.8.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, Ruth. 2018. “Discourses about Nationalism.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 403–420. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wulff, Matthias. 2006. “Werte-Test für Muslime: Der strittige Fragenkatalog aus Baden-Württemberg.” Welt am Sonntag, January 8, 2006. https://www.welt.de/print-wams/article137162/Werte-Test-fuer-Muslime-Der-strittige-Fragenkatalog-aus-Baden-Wuerttemberg.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40 (3): 196–213. doi:10.1080/00313220600769331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging. Intersectional Contestations. Los Angeles: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446251041.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira, and Floya Anthias. 1989. “Introduction.” In Woman—Nation—State, edited by Nira Yuval-Davis, and Floya Anthias, 1–15. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar