Boundary integrationism and its subject: shifts and continuities in the EU framework on migrant integration

References

• Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Bridget. 2013. Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control. 1st ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É. 2007. “Is There a “Neo-Racism”?” In Race and Racialization: Essential Readings, edited by T. D. Gupta, C. E. James, R. C. A. Maaka, G.-E. Galabuzi, and C. Andersen, 83–88. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbulescu, R. 2015. “Inside Fortress Europe: The Europeanisation of Immigrant Integration and its Impact on Identity Boundaries.” Politique Europeenne 47 (1): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.047.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. 2001. “Migration and Security.” In Controlling a New Migration World, Routledge/EUI Studies in the Political Economy of Welfare, edited by V. Guiraudon, and C. Joppke, 121–149. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blankvoort, N., D. Laliberte Rudman, M. van Hartingsveldt, and A. Krumeich. 2023. ““New” Dutch Civic Integration: Learning “Spontaneous Compliance” to Address Inherent Difference.” Critical Discourse Studies 0 (0): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2179648.
   Google Scholar
• Block, L., and S. Bonjour. 2013. “Fortress Europe or Europe of Rights? The Europeanisation of Family Migration Policies in France, Germany and the Netherlands.” European Journal of Migration and Law 15 (2): 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonjour, S. 2014. “The Transfer of Pre-Departure Integration Requirements for Family Migrants among Member States of the European Union.” Comparative Migration Studies 2 (2): 203–226. https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2014.2.BONJ.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M., and M. Erdilmen. 2022. “Is the International Organization for Migration Legitimate? Rights-Talk, Protection Commitments and the Legitimation of IOM.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 0 (0): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2147489.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A. 2016. ““We Must Demonstrate Intolerance toward the Intolerant”: Boundary Liberalism in Citizenship Education for Immigrants in Germany.” Critical Sociology 42 (3): 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514527848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2017. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1294700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, I., S. Jacquot, and L. Mandin. 2006. “Europeanization Through its Instrumentation: Benchmarking, Mainstreaming and the Open Method of Co-ordination … Toolbox or Pandora’s Box?” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (4): 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600693895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. J., and C. M. Radaelli. 2004. The Europeanisation of National Policy?. Queen's Papers on Europeanisation. Belfast: Queen's University Belfast.
   Google Scholar
• Carabine, J. 2001. “Unmarried Motherhood 1830–1990: A Genealogical Analysis.” In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, edited by M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. Yates, 267–310. London; Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S. 2009. In Search of the Perfect Citizen? The Intersection between Integration, Immigration, and Nationality in the EU. Immigration and Asylum law and Policy in Europe. Leiden ; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., and A. Wiesbrock. 2009. Civic Integration of Third-Country Nationals. Nationalism versus Europeanisation in the Common EU Immigration Policy. Liberty and Security in Europe. CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., and G. Menz, eds. 2015. Social Policy and the Eurocrisis: Quo Vadis Social Europe. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahinden, J., and S. Manser-Egli. 2022. “Gendernativism and Liberal Subjecthood: The Cases of Forced Marriage and the Burqa Ban in Switzerland’.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 30 (1): 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab053.
   Google Scholar
• Dombos, T., A. Kriszan, M. Verloo, and V. Zentai. 2012. “Critical Frame Analysis: A Comparative Methodology for the “Quality in Gender+ Equality Policies” (QUING) Project.” Working Paper Series, Center for Policy Studies (CEU). https://cps.ceu.edu/sites/cps.ceu.edu/files/cps-working-paper-critical-frame-analysis-quing-2012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 2007. “Citizenship Tests: A Comparative, Communitarian Perspective.” The Political Quarterly 78 (3): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00864.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faist, T., and A. Ette. 2007. The Europeanization of National Policies and Politics of Immigration: Between Autonomy and the European Union. Basingstoke [England], New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2001. Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. Migration, Minorities, and Citizenship. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave in Association with Centre for Research in Ethnic Relations, University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Favell, A. 2022. The Integration Nation: Immigration and Colonial Power in Liberal Democracies. Immigration and Society. Medford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, C., and K. K. Jensen. 2017. “The Civic Integrationist Turn in Danish and Swedish School Politics.” Comparative Migration Studies 5: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-017-0049-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality: With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. 2008. Immigration and European Integration: Beyond Fortress Europe? European Policy Research Unit Series. 2nd. ed. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., and M. Achtnich. 2015. “Research-Policy Dialogues in the European Union.” In Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues, IMISCOE Research Series, edited by P. Scholten, H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, and S. Verbeek, 293–311. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16256-0_16
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. W. 2011. “Controlling Immigration through Language and Country Knowledge Requirements.” West European Politics 34 (2): 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. 2000. “European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-Making as Venue Shopping.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (2): 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2008. “The Ambiguity of Europe.” European Societies 10 (2): 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701835253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joppke, C. 2007. “Beyond National Models: Civic Integration Policies for Immigrants in Western Europe.” West European Politics 30 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korteweg, A. C. 2017. “The Failures of ‘Immigrant Integration’: The Gendered Racialized Production of Non-belonging.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakopoulou, D. 2014. “The Anatomy of Civic Integration.” In Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration: Theory and Practice. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series, edited by F. Anthias, and M. Pajnik, 37–63. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137294005_3
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2019. “Founding Myths of EU Europe and the Workings of Power in the EU Heritage and History Initiatives.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 22 (5–6): 781–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418755921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matamoros, C. A. 2019. ““European Way of Life”: Was von der Leyen the First to Use the Term?” euronews. Accessed February 11, 2022. https://www.euronews.com/2019/09/13/was-von-der-leyen-the-first-to-use-the-controversial-european-way-of-life-phrase.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. 2006. “Neoliberal Governmentality in the European Union: Education, Training, and Technologies of Citizenship.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24 (3): 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1068/d1804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffette, D., and W. Walters. 2018. “Flickering Presence: Theorizing Race and Racism in the Governmentality of Borders and Migration.” Studies in Social Justice 12 (1): 92–110. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncrieffe, J. 2007. “Introduction: Labelling, Power and Accountability: How and Why 'Our' Categories Matter.” In The Power of Labeling: How People are Categorized and why it Matters, edited by R. Eyben, and J. Moncrieffe, 1–16. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Z. M. Oxley, and R. A. Clawson. 1997. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19 (3): 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834831093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenow, K. 2009. “The Europeanisation of Integration Policies.” International Migration 47 (1): 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2008.00499.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytter, M. 2019. “Writing against Integration: Danish Imaginaries of Culture, Race and Belonging.” Ethnos 84 (4): 678–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2017. Imagined Societies: A Critique of Immigrant Integration in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316424230
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2018. “Against ‘Immigrant Integration’: For an End to Neocolonial Knowledge Production.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (1): 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholten, P., H. Entzinger, R. Penninx, and S. Verbeek, eds. 2015. Integrating Immigrants in Europe: Research-Policy Dialogues. IMISCOE Research Series. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16256-0
   Google Scholar
• Scholten, P., and S. Verbeek. 2015. “Politicization and Expertise: Changing Research-Policy Dialogues on Migrant Integration in Europe.” Science and Public Policy 42 (2): 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C. 2013. Building Europe. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Triadafilopoulos, T. 2011. “Illiberal Means to Liberal Ends? Understanding Recent Immigrant Integration Policies in Europe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (6): 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2011.576189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houdt, F., S. Suvarierol, and W. Schinkel. 2011. “Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends Towards ‘Earned Citizenship’ in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands.” International Sociology 26 (3): 408–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar