3,978
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

Cost-effectiveness analysis of fruquintinib versus regorafenib as the third-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in China

, , , , , & show all
Pages 339-344 | Received 08 Oct 2020, Accepted 08 Feb 2021, Published online: 01 Mar 2021

References

  • Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
  • Zheng R, Sun K, Zhang S, et al. Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015. Chin J Oncol. 2019;41:19–28.
  • Cai J, Cai S, Qin X, et al. Guideline for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (2016 edition). Chin J Dig Surg. 2016;36:858–869.
  • Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Working Group. Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) diagnosis and treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer 2019. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2019.
  • Xu RH, Li J, Bai Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of fruquintinib in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase Ib study and a randomized double-blind phase II study. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):22.
  • Li J, Qin S, Xu RH, et al. Effect of fruquintinib vs placebo on overall survival in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: the FRESCO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2486–2496.
  • Liu GG. China guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Beijing, China: China Market Press; 2020.
  • Goldstein DA, Ahmad BB, Chen Q, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of regorafenib for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(32):3727–3732.
  • Tumeh JW, Shenoy PJ, Moore SG, et al. A Markov model assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FOLFOX compared with FOLFIRI for the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32(1):49–55.
  • Hoyle M, Peters J, Crathorne L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Value Health. 2013;16(2):288–296.
  • Li J, Qin S, Xu R, et al. Regorafenib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CONCUR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):619–629.
  • Guyot P, Ades AE, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:9.
  • Lloyd A, Nafees B, Narewska J, et al. Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(6):683–690.
  • Jiangsu Public Resource Trading Platform. Platform JPRT. Part of the record purchase and the direct-linked network purchases drugs in Jiangsu Province. Nanjing; 2019. Available from: http://news.pharmnet.com.cn/news/2019/05/10/521748.html
  • Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of the People's Republic of China (MoHRSS). Administration CMS. Notification about including 17 anti-cancer drugs into the national basic insurance, work-related accident insurance and maternity insurance. Beijing; 2018. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-10/10/content_5328891.htm
  • Shen L, Ying X, Li Q, et al. PCN67 – treatment patterns and economic burden of Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study of electronic medical records from urban China. Value Health. 2018; 21:S23.
  • Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303–312.