3,720
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Vaccines

Cost-effectiveness of the cell-based quadrivalent versus the standard egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Germany

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 490-501 | Received 02 Dec 2020, Accepted 15 Mar 2021, Published online: 19 Apr 2021

References

  • World Health Organization (WHO). Influenza (Seasonal) 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/influenza-(seasonal).
  • Robert Koch Institut (RKI). Report on the epidemiology of influenza in Germany - 2018/2019. Berlin, Germany; 2019.
  • Sellers SA, Hagan RS, Hayden FG, et al. The hidden burden of influenza: a review of the extra-pulmonary complications of influenza infection. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017;11(5):372–393.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). People at high risk for flu complications. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/highrisk/index.htm.
  • Robert Koch Institut (RKI). Recommendations of the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) at the Robert Koch Institute – 2017/2018. Berlin, Germany; 2018.
  • Harding AT, Heaton NS. Efforts to improve the seasonal influenza vaccine. Vaccines (Basel). 2018;6(2):19.
  • Rajaram S, Boikos C, Gelone DK, et al. Influenza vaccines: the potential benefits of cell-culture isolation and manufacturing. Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2020;8:2515135520908121.
  • Wu NC, Zost SJ, Thompson AJ, et al. A structural explanation for the low effectiveness of the seasonal influenza H3N2 vaccine. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(10):e1006682.
  • Zost SJ, Parkhouse K, Gumina ME, et al. Contemporary H3N2 influenza viruses have a glycosylation site that alters binding of antibodies elicited by egg-adapted vaccine strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(47):12578–12583.
  • Skowronski DM, Janjua NZ, De Serres G, et al. Low 2012-13 influenza vaccine effectiveness associated with mutation in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain not antigenic drift in circulating viruses. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92153.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cell-based flu vaccines. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/cell-based.htm.
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA). Flucelvax Tetra, summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/flucelvax-tetra-epar-product-information_en.pdf.
  • Seqirus A CSL company. First cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine approved for use in Europe. Available from: https://www.seqirus.com/news/first-cell-based-quadrivalent-influenza-vaccine-approved-in-europe.
  • Calabro GE, Boccalini S, Del Riccio M, et al. Valutazione di health technology assessment (HTA) del vaccino antinfluenzale quadrivalente da coltura cellulare: FLUCELVAX TETR [Health technology assessment (HTA) evaluation of quadrivalent cell culture flu vaccine: FLUCELVAX TETR]. Ital J Public Health. 2019;8(5):113–143.
  • Nguyen VH, Nasiri M, Mould-Quevedo J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a cell culture-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the adult population of the United Kingdom. Presented at: 29th National Immunisation Conference for Health Care Workers, London, UK. 2018.
  • Nguyen VH, Hilsky Y, Mould-Quevedo J. The epidemiological and economic impact of a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in an adult population in the US: a dynamic modelling approach. Research Square. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-27872/v1
  • Ruiz-Aragón J, Gani R, Márquez S, et al. Estimated cost-effectiveness and burden of disease associated with quadrivalent cell-based and egg-based influenza vaccines in Spain. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(9):2238–2244.
  • Eichner M, Schwehm M, Hain J, et al. 4Flu – an individual based simulation tool to study the effects of quadrivalent vaccination on seasonal influenza in Germany. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:365.
  • Haas W. Influenza: Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und öffentliche Gesundheit. Munich (Germany): Elsevier GmbH; 2009.
  • Dolk C, Eichner M, Welte R, et al. Cost-utility of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Germany, using an individual-based dynamic transmission model. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(12):1299–1308. PubMed PMID: 27647004; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5110585 this study (GSK Study Identifier: HO-14-14994) and was involved in all stages of the study, including analysis of the data. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA also covered all costs associated with the development and publication of this manuscript. Conflict of interest AA, RSO and RW are employees of the GSK group of companies. RSO, AA and RW declare restricted shares ownership in the GSK group of companies. ME is a shareholder of Epimos GmbH, which has received funding from the GSK group of companies to complete the work disclosed here as well as consultancy fees from AstraZeneca. MS is a shareholder of ExploSYS GmbH, which has received funding from Epimos GmbH to complete the work disclosed here. BPN’s, LAVB’s and IVV’s companies received consultancy fees from the GSK group of companies to complete the work disclosed here as well as for other work outside this study. MP received grants and honoraria from various pharmaceutical companies, inclusive of those developing, manufacturing and marketing influenza vaccines. CD declares no conflict of interest. eng.
  • STIKO. 2016. Modelling methods for predicting epidemiological and health economic effects of vaccinations – Guidance for analyses to be presented to the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO) (last updated: 16 March 2016), Berlin.
  • IQWiG. Institute for quality and efficiency in health care: general methods. Cologne, Germany;2015.
  • European Medicines Agency (EMA). 2018. The Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP): European public assessment report (EPAR). http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/.
  • Eichner M, Schwehm M, Eichner L, et al. Direct and indirect effects of influenza vaccination. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):308.
  • Boikos C, Sylvester GC, Sampalis JS, et al. Effectiveness of the cell culture- and egg-derived, seasonal influenza vaccine during the 2017–2018 Northern Hemisphere Influenza Season. Atlanta (GA): National Adult and Influenza Immunization Summit; 2019.
  • Belongia EA, Simpson MD, King JP, et al. Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(8):942–951.
  • Rajaram S, Suphaphiphat P, van Boxmeer J, et al. Retrospective assessment of the antigenic similarity of egg-propagated and cell culture-propagated reference influenza viruses as compared with circulating viruses across influenza seasons 2002–2003 to 2017–2018. IJERPH. 2020;17(15):5423.
  • Jefferson T, Di Pietrantonj C, Al-Ansary LA, et al. Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):CD004876.
  • Jefferson T, Di Pietrantonj C, Rivetti A, et al. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2(7):CD001269.
  • Jefferson T, Rivetti A, Di Pietrantonj C, et al. Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(8):CD004879.
  • Carrat F, Vergu E, Ferguson NM, et al. Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(7):775–785.
  • Boehme AK, Luna J, Kulick ER, et al. Influenza-like illness as a trigger for ischemic stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(4):456–463.
  • Kwong JC, Schwartz KL, Campitelli MA, et al. Acute myocardial infarction after laboratory-confirmed influenza infection. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):345–353.
  • Palm F, Urbanek C, Rose S, et al. Stroke incidence and survival in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany: the Ludwigshafen Stroke Study (LuSSt). Stroke. 2010;41(9):1865–1870.
  • Ara R, Brazier JE. Using health state utility values from the general population to approximate baselines in decision analytic models when condition-specific data are not available. Value Health. 2011;14(4):539–545.
  • Mauskopf JA, Cates SC, Griffin AD, et al. Cost effectiveness of Zanamivir for the treatment of influenza in a high risk population in Australia. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17(6):611–620.
  • Inflation rates. Inflation rates in Germany 2018. Available from: https://www.inflation.eu/inflation-rates/germany/historic-inflation/cpi-inflation-germany-2017.aspx.
  • Robert Koch Institut (RKI). Influenza surveillance: vaccinnation coverage per region in Germany from the year 2009 onwards. Berlin (Germany): Robert Koch Institute; 2018.
  • G-DRG-Browser. G-DRG-Browser 2018 2018. Available from: http://www.g-drg.de.
  • EBM. Uniform rating scale: the uniform standard of evaluation (EBM) is the remuneration system of contract medical or contract psychotherapeutic care in Germany 2018. Available from: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/begriffe-von-a-z/e/einheitlicher-bewertungsmassstab-ebm.html.
  • EUROSTAT. Labour costs. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/labour-market/labour-costs. 2019a.
  • EUROSTAT. Employment and unemployment. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/database. 2019b.
  • Kotseva K, Gerlier L, Sidelnikov E, et al. Patient and caregiver productivity loss and indirect costs associated with cardiovascular events in Europe. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(11):1150–1157.
  • Stahmeyer JT, Rossol S, Liersch S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treating hepatitis C with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in Germany. PloS One. 2017;12(1):e0169401.
  • JCVI PHE (UK). Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation: Advice on influenza vaccines for 2020/21. London (UK): Department of Health & Social Care, Government of the United Kingdom; 2019.
  • Bruxvoort KJ, Luo Y, Ackerson B, et al. Comparison of vaccine effectiveness against influenza hospitalization of cell-based and egg-based influenza vaccines, 2017–2018. Vaccine. 2019;37(39):5807–5811.