Decision-making about mammographic screening: pursuing informed choice

References

• Standing Committee on Screening (SCoS) of the Community Care and Population Health Principal Committee (CCPHPC) of the Australian Health Ministers’ Advisory Council (AHMAC). Population Based Screening Framework. 2016
   Google Scholar
• Bell R. Screening mammography – early detection or over-diagnosis? Contribution from Australian data. Climacteric 2014;17(Suppl 2):66–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanek ME. Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1821–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley KC, Gladwell C, Murray PJ, et al. The UK breast screening program – what you need to know. Climacteric 2017;20:313–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis K, Baxter J. Trusting technology: women aged 40-49 years participating in screening for breast cancer – an exploratory study. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003;27:282–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Jr., et al. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA 2004;291:71–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller J, Osborne K, Wardle J. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey. Br J Cancer 2015;112:562–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:274–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Clinicians’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med 2017;177:407–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, et al. Cancer screening campaigns – getting past uninformative persuasion. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1677–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapka JG, Geller BM, Bulliard J-L, et al. Print information to inform decisions about mammography screening participation in 16 countries with population-based programs. Patient Educ Couns 2006;63:126–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ 2006;332:538–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummersbach E, Piccoliori G, Oriol Zerbe C, et al. Are women getting relevant information about mammography screening for an informed consent: a critical appraisal of information brochures used for screening invitation in Germany, Italy, Spain and France. Eur J Public Health 2010;20:409–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton H. Pairing accountability with responsibility: the consequences of screening ‘promotion’. Med Sci Monit 2001;7:531–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• General Medical Council (UK). Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008. Available from: www.gmc-uk.org/guidance
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. UK: The Stationery Office; 2010
   Google Scholar
• 111th United States Congress. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Public Law 111-148, 2010. Available from: https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/3590
   Google Scholar
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian Safety and Quality Framework for Health Care. 2010. Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/national-priorities/australian-safety-and-quality-framework-for-health-care/
   Google Scholar
• Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012;344:e256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesecker BB, Schwartz MD, Marteau TM. Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav 2013;37:351–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006;333:417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, et al. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:S12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99–108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersch J, Barratt A, Jansen J, et al. Use of a decision aid including information on overdetection to support informed choice about breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:1642–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;4:CD001431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Agt HM, Korfage IJ, Essink-Bot ML. Interventions to enhance informed choices among invitees of screening programmes – a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:789–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Alonso M, Carles-Lavila M, Perez-Lacasta MJ, et al. Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M, et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making 2014;34:699–710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevena LJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Edwards A, et al. Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013;13:S7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SK, Trevena L, Simpson JM, et al. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;341:c5370
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forbes LJ, Ramirez AJ. Expert group on Information about Breast Screening. Offering informed choice about breast screening. J Med Screen 2014;21:194–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MA, Carpenter L, Dolan H, et al. Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e94670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ 2017;357:j1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ 2008;337:a1591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rychetnik L, Carter SM, Abelson J, et al. Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:380–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul C, Nicholls R, Priest P, et al. Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens’ deliberation. Health Policy 2008;85:314–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esserman LJ, Thompson IM, Jr, Reid B. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement. JAMA 2013;310:797–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler WB, Burki RE, Kolter J, et al. Mammography for symptomless women – not so wise? Climacteric 2013;16:313–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegwarth O, Gigerenzer G. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluation of what physicians tell their patients about screening harms. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:2086–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan R, Nickel B, Hersch J, et al. Public opinions about overdiagnosis: a national community survey. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch J, McGeechan K, Barratt A, et al. How information about overdetection changes breast cancer screening decisions: a mediation analysis within a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016246
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivlev I, Hickman EN, McDonagh MS, et al. Use of patient decision aids increased younger women’s reluctance to begin screening mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2017;32:803–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch J, McCaffery K. Using a decision aid may prompt some younger women (38–50 years) to rethink breast cancer screening plans. Evid Based Nurs 2018;21:10–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruman J. Too much information? [Letter]. Hastings Cent Rep 2012;42:4–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith SK, Kearney P, Trevena L, et al. Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids. Health Expect 2014;17:511–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson M, Brodersen J. Informed choice in screening needs more than information. Lancet 2015;385:1597–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum L. “Misfearing” – culture, identity, and our perceptions of health risks. N Engl J Med 2014;370:595–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum L. Invisible risks, emotional choices – mammography and medical decision making. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1549–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn HS, Welch HG. South Korea’s thyroid-cancer “‘Epidemic’ – Turning the Tide”. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2389–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman RM, Elmore JG, Fairfield KM, et al. Lack of shared decision making in cancer screening discussions: results from a national survey. Am J Prev Med 2014;47:251–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychetnik L, Doust J, Thomas R, et al. A community jury on PSA screening: what do well-informed men want the government to do about prostate cancer screening – a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar