Role of breast density measurement in screening for breast cancer

References

• Yaffe M, Boyd N. Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view. Gynecol Endocrinol 2005;21(Suppl 1):6–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, et al. Supplemental screening for breast cancer in women with dense breasts: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan. Report No.: 14-05201-EF-3
   Google Scholar
• McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1159–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assi V, Massat NJ, Thomas S, et al. A case-control study to assess the impact of mammographic density on breast cancer risk in women aged 40-49 at intermediate familial risk. Int J Cancer 2015;136:2378–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd N, Martin L, Gunasekara A, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:1754–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarelli AM, Prummel MV, Muradali D, et al. Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;154:377–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy SM, Koga K, Woolcott CG, et al. Higher alcohol intake may modify the association between mammographic density and breast cancer: an analysis of three case-control studies. Cancer Epidemiol 2012;36:458–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy SM, Woolcott CG, Koga KR, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by adiposity: an analysis of four case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2012;130:1915–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Warren R, Girling A, et al. Mammographic density, estrogen receptor status and other breast cancer tumor characteristics. Breast J 2010;16:279–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy SW, Nagtegaal ID, Astley SM, et al. Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel LA, Lipson JA, Achacoso N, et al. Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18:53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Choi YH, Nguyen TL, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer in Korean women. Eur J Cancer Prev 2015;24:422–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickson C, Arzhaeva Y, Aitken Z, et al. AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15:R80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Ding J, Warren RM, et al. Using mammographic density to predict breast cancer risk: dense area or percentage dense area. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanders JOP, Holland K, Karssemeijer N, et al. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand KA, Tamimi RM, Scott CG, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15:R104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1179–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitken Z, McCormack VA, Highnam RP, et al. Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods. Cancer. Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:418–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attam A, Kaur N, Saha S, et al. Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a low risk population. Indian J Cancer 2008;45:50–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, et al. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill JK, Maskarinec G, Pagano I, et al. The association of mammographic density with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the multiethnic cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heusinger K, Loehberg CR, Haeberle L, et al. Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a German case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2011;20:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh AM, Byrnes GB, Nickson C, et al. Using mammographic density to improve breast cancer screening outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:2818–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsuma Y, Tamaki Y, Nishimura T, et al. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women. Breast 2008;17:27–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Giger ML, Lan L, et al. Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls. J Med Imag 2014;1:031009
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, et al. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:R114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokate M, Stellato RK, Veldhuis WB, et al. Age-related changes in mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:101–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992;84:781–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H, et al. Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:456–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell G, Antoniou AC, Warren R, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Res 2006;66:1866–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollan M, Ascunce N, Ederra M, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15:R9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, et al. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk. Cancer. Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:921–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkel RR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Nielsen M, et al. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015;15:274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CS, Lim GH, Gao F, et al. Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population. Br J Cancer 2011;104:871–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Rosner B, et al. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2012;23:785–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert M, Schnabel F, Chun J, et al. The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2015;39:987–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchini RS, Costantino JP, Cauley JA, et al. Baseline mammographic breast density and the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women participating in the NSABP study of tamoxifen and raloxifene (STAR). Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012;5:1321–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers AM, Sieh W, Lipson JA, et al. Breast cancer risk and mammographic density assessed with semiautomated and fully automated methods and BI-RADS. Radiology 2017;282:348–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in White and African American Women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;135:571–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:337–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FL, Chen F, Yin H, et al. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:2277–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:493–502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V, et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopper JL. Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations. Am J Epidemiol 2015;182:863–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1048–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack VA, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, et al. Changes and tracking of mammographic density in relation to Pike's model of breast tissue aging: a UK longitudinal study. Int J Cancer 2010;127:452–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan K, Baglietto L, Stone J, et al. Longitudinal study of mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:651–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, et al. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:732–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves KW, Stone RA, Modugno F, et al. Longitudinal association of anthropometry with mammographic breast density in the study of women's health across the nation. Int J Cancer 2009;124:1169–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brentnall AR, Harkness EF, Astley SM, et al. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 2015;17:147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1215–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerlikowske K, Ma L, Scott CG, et al. Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick J, Birke H, Stone J, et al. Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the international breast cancer intervention study I. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DG, Warwick J, Astley SM, et al. Assessing individual breast cancer risk within the U.K. national health service breast screening program: a new paradigm for cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012;5:943–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans DG, Howell A. Can the breast screening appointment be used to provide risk assessment and prevention advice?. Breast Cancer Res 2015;17:84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Bickerstaffe A, et al. Breast cancer risk prediction using clinical models and 77 independent risk-associated SNPs for women aged under 50 years: Australian breast cancer family registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:359–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:886–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, et al. The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:612–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung J, Song YM, Stone J, et al. Genetic influences on mammographic density in Korean twin and family: the healthy twin study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;124:467–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin G, Lillie EO, Lee E, et al. The relative importance of genetics and environment on mammographic density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18:102–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese JS, Smith PL, Folkerd E, et al. The heritability of mammographic breast density and circulating sex-hormone levels: two independent breast cancer risk factors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:2167–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese JS, Thompson DJ, Michailidou K, et al. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer: evidence of a shared genetic basis. Cancer Res 2012;72:1478–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand JS, Humphreys K, Thompson DJ, et al. Volumetric mammographic density: heritability and association with breast cancer susceptibility loci. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindstrom S, Thompson DJ, Paterson AD, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk. Nat Comms 2014;5:5303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Thompson DJ, Dos Santos Silva I, et al. Novel associations between common breast cancer susceptibility variants and risk-predicting mammographic density measures. Cancer Res 2015;75:2457–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon CM, Scott CG, Fasching PA, et al. Common breast cancer susceptibility variants in LSP1 and RAD51L1 are associated with mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:1156–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt KR, Scott CG, Ma L, et al. Comparison of clinical and automated breast density measurements: implications for risk prediction and supplemental screening. Radiology 2016;279:710–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonzo-Proulx O, Mawdsley GE, Patrie JT, et al. Reliability of automated breast density measurements. Radiology 2015;275:366–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Czene K, Pawitan Y, et al. A clinical model for identifying the short-term risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller BM, Chen J, Daye D, et al. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography. Breast Cancer Res 2015;17:117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastounioti A, Conant EF, Kontos D. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18:91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, et al. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF, et al. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:652–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TL, Aung YK, Evans CF, et al. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res 2015;17:142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd N, Martin L, Chavez S, et al. Breast-tissue composition and other risk factors for breast cancer in young women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:569–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denholm R, De Stavola B, Hipwell JH, et al. Growth trajectories, breast size, and breast-tissue composition in a British pre-birth cohort of young women. Am J Epidemiol 2017; doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx358. Epub ahead of print
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maskarinec G, Morimoto Y, Daida Y, et al. A comparison of breast density measures between mothers and adolescent daughters. BMC Cancer 2011;11:330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmore KM, Knight JA, Lilge L. Association between transillumination breast spectroscopy and quantitative mammographic features of the breast. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1043–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilge L, Terry MB, Walter J, et al. Non-invasive optical spectroscopic monitoring of breast development during puberty. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19:12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JH, Lee YW, Chan SW, et al. Breast density analysis with automated whole-breast ultrasound: comparison with 3-D magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:1211–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak M, Duric N, Littrup P, et al. Using speed of sound imaging to characterize breast density. Ultrasound Med Biol 2017;43:91–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskarinec G, Morimoto Y, Laguana MB, et al. Bioimpedence to assess breast density as a risk factor for breast cancer in adult women and adolescent girls. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:65–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:267–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destounis S, Johnston L, Highnam R, et al. Using volumetric breast density to quantify the potential masking risk of mammographic density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:222–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan K, Baglietto L, Apicella C, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case–control study. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18:63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emaus MJ, Bakker MF, Peeters PH, et al. MR imaging as an additional screening modality for the detection of breast cancer in women aged 50–75 years with extremely dense breasts: the DENSE trial study design. Radiology 2015;277:527–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houssami N, Turner RM. Rapid review: estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts. Breast 2016;30:141–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL, et al. Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:241–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shermis RB, Redfern RE, Burns J, et al. Molecular breast imaging in breast cancer screening and problem solving. Radiographics 2017;37:1309–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Felker SA, Tekchandani L, Thomas M, et al. Newly diagnosed breast cancer: comparison of contrast–enhanced spectral mammography and breast MR imaging in the evaluation of extent of disease. Radiology 2017;285:389–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shawky MS, Martin H, Hugo HJ, et al. Mammographic density: a potential monitoring biomarker for adjuvant and preventative breast cancer endocrine therapies. Oncotarget 2017;8:5578–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyante SJ, Sherman ME, Pfeiffer RM, et al. Longitudinal change in mammographic density among ER-positive breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25:212–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:621–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:744–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar