Reading in the Global Literary Marketplace: Material and Textual Affects

References

• Ahmad, Aijaz. 1992. In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Paul. B. 2011. “In Defense of Reading: Or, Why Reading Still Matters in a Contextualist Age.” New Literary History 42 (1): 87–113. doi: 10.1353/nlh.2011.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, Bill. 1989. “Constitutive Graphonomy: A Post-Colonial Theory of Literary Writing.” Kunapipi 11 (1): 58–73. https://www.ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol11/iss1/9.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcroft, Bill. 2015. “Towards a Postcolonial Aesthetics.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 51 (4): 410–421. doi:10.1080/17449855.2015.1023590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attridge, Derek. 2012. “Responsible Reading and Cultural Distance.” In Postcolonial Audiences: Readers, Viewers and Reception, edited by Bethan Benwell, James Procter, and Gemma Robinson, 234–244. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, Roland. 1967. “The Death of the Author.” Aspen, 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benwell, Bethan, James Procter, and Gemma Robinson, eds. 2012. “Introduction.” In Postcolonial Audiences: Readers, Viewers and Reception, 1–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmer, Elleke. 2005. Colonial and Postcolonial Literature: Migrant Metaphors. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmer, Elleke. 2018. Postcolonial Poetics: 21st-Century Critical Readings. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2011. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brouillette, Sarah. 2007. Postcolonial Writers in the Global Literary Marketplace. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, Pascale. 2004. The World Republic of Letters. Translated by M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Caroline. 2013. Creating the Postcolonial: African Writers and British Publishers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1992. “‘This Strange Institution Called Literature’: An Interview with Jacques Derrida.” In Acts of Literature, edited by Derek Attridge, 33–75. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fluck, Winfried. 2000. The Search for Distance: Negation and Negativity in the Literary Theory of Wolfgang Iser. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Genette, Gerard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huggan, Graham. 2001. The Postcolonial Exotic. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, C. L. 2007. The Cambridge Introduction to Postcolonial Literatures in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iser, Wolfgang. 2000. The Range of Interpretation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koegler, C. 2018. Critical Branding: Postcolonial Studies and the Market. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, ed. 2005. Third Source of Uncertainty: Objects Too Have Agency. Chap. 1, Sect. 4 in Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low, Gail. 2011. Publishing the Postcolonial: Anglophone West African and Caribbean Writing in the UK 1948–1968. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, Mike. 2000. “‘Little Enough, Less Than Little: Nothing’: Ethics, Engagement, and Change in the Fiction of J. M. Coetzee.” Modern Fiction Studies 46 (1): 159–182. doi: 10.1353/mfs.2000.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, Mike. 2006. “J. M. Coetzee’s ‘Disgrace’ and the Task of the Imagination.” Journal of Modern Literature 29 (2): 75–93. doi: 10.1353/jml.2006.0022
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, Brian. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, Peter. 2010. “The Ethics of Reading and the Question of the Novel: The Challenge of J. M. Coetzee's Diary of a Bad Year.” NOVEL: A Forum on Fiction 43 (3): 483–499. doi:10.1215/00295132-2010-026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, John. 2010. Beginning Postcolonialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, John. 2017. “Postcolonial Studies and the Ethics of the Quarrel.” Paragraph 40 (1): 97–113. doi:10.3366/para.2017.0217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. Hillis. 1987. The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James, and Benjamin. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. Hillis. 2002. Speech Acts in Literature. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Mary Louise. 1991. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession, 33–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25595469.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Mary Louise. 2008. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Procter, James. 2009. “Reading, Taste and Postcolonial Studies: Professional and Lay Readers of Things Fall Apart.” Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 11 (2): 180–198. doi:10.1080/13698010903053253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procter, James, and Bethan Benwell. 2014. Reading Across Worlds: Transnational Book Groups and the Reception of Difference. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ranasinha, Ruvani. 2007. South Asian Writers in Twentieth-Century Britain: Culture in Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slemon, Stephen. 1987. “Monuments of Empire: Allegory/Counter-Discourse/Post-Colonial Writing.” Kunapipi 9 (3): 1–16. https://www.ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol9/iss3/3.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader, edited by Laura Chrisman, and Patrick Williams, 66–111. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2012. An Aesthetic Education in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Victor. 1977. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Cornell Paperbacks: Ithaca.
   Google Scholar
• Wainaina, Binyavanga. 2006. “How to Write about Africa.” Granta 92.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, Wendy. 1995. “Is This Your Book? Wrapping Postcolonial Fiction for the Global Market.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 22 (3–4): 455–466. https://www.journals.library.ualberta.ca/crcl/index.php/crcl/article/view/3519.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick Research Collective (WReC). 2015. Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, George M. 1994. “Edward Said on Contrapuntal Reading.” Philosophy and Literature 18 (2): 265–273. doi:10.1353/phl.1994.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, John K. 2006. Black Writers, White Publishers: Marketplace Politics in Twentieth-Century African American Literature. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
   Google Scholar