937
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Who’s afraid of a world state? A global sovereign and the statist-cosmopolitan debate

References

  • Beitz, C., 2009. The moral standing of states revisited. Ethics & international affairs, 23, 325–347.
  • Blake, M., 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and public affairs, 30 (3), 257–296.10.1111/papa.2001.30.issue-3
  • Brock, G., 2010. Recent work on rawls’s law of peoples: critics versus defenders. American philosophical quarterly, 47, 85–101.
  • Cabrera, L., 2004. Political theory of global justice: a cosmopolitan case for the world state. London: Routledge.
  • Cabrera, L., 2010. Review article: World government: renewed debate, persistent challenges. European journal of international relations, 16, 511–530.10.1177/1354066109346888
  • Caney, S., 2002. Cosmopolitanism and the law of peoples. Journal of political philosophy, 10, 95–123.10.1111/1467-9760.00144
  • Cohen, J., 2010. Philosophy, social science, global poverty. In: Alison Jaggar, ed. Thomas pogge and his critics. London: Polity.
  • Craig, C., 2008. The resurgent idea of World Government. Ethics & international affairs, 22 (2), 133–142.
  • Deudney, D.H., 2006. Bounding power: republican security theory from the polis to the global village. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Freeman, S., 2006. The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights and distributive justice. Social Philosophy and Policy, 29–68.10.1017/S026505250606002X
  • Heath, J., 2005. Rawls on global distributive justice: a defence. Canadian journal of philosophy, 31, 193–226.
  • Jensen, M., 2009. The limits of practical possibility. Journal of political philosophy, 17, 168–184.10.1111/jopp.2009.17.issue-2
  • Kuper, A., 2000. Rawlsian global justice: beyond the law of peoples to a cosmopolitan law of persons. Political theory, 28, 640–674.10.1177/0090591700028005004
  • Macedo, S., 2003-2004. What self-governing peoples owe to one another: universalism, diversity, and the law of Peoples. Fordham law review, 72, 1721–1738.
  • Marchetti, R., 2008. Global democracy: for and against. London: Routledge.
  • Nagel, T., 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and public affairs, 33, 113–147.10.1111/papa.2005.33.issue-2
  • Nili, S., 2011a. Democratic disengagement: towards Rousseauian global reform. International theory, 3, 355–389.10.1017/S1752971911000157
  • Nili, S., 2011b. Our problem of global justice. Social theory and practice, 37 (4), 629–653.10.5840/soctheorpract201137436
  • Nili, S. Ideal theory and ignorant knowledge of change. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Pogge, T., 1990. The effects of prevalent moral conceptions. Social research, 57, 649–663.
  • Pogge, T., 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics, 103, 48–75.10.1086/et.1992.103.issue-1
  • Pogge, T., 1994. An Egalitarian Law of Peoples. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, 195–224.10.1111/papa.1994.23.issue-3
  • Pogge, T., 2001a. Achieving Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs, 15, 1–23.
  • Pogge, T., 2001b. Rawls on International Justice. The philosophical quarterly, 51, 246–253.10.1111/phiq.2001.51.issue-203
  • Pogge, T., 2003-2004. The incoherence between Rawls’s Theories of Justice. Fordham law review, 72, 1739–1759.
  • Pogge, T. 2007. Severe poverty as human rights violation. In: Pogge, ed. Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right – who owes what to the very poor? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–54.
  • Pogge, T., 2008. Cohen to the Rescue!. Ratio, 21 (4), 454–475.10.1111/rati.2008.21.issue-4
  • Pogge, T., 2009. Kant’s Vision of a Just World Order. In: Tom Hill, ed. Blackwell Companion to Kant’s Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 196–208.
  • Rawls, J., 1999a. A theory of justice. revd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J., 1999b. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J., 2001. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rousseau, J.J., 1991. Abstract and Judgment of Saint-Pierre’s Project for Perpetual Peace. In: Stanley Hoffman and David P. Fidler, eds. Rousseau on International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 100.
  • Simmons, A.J., 2010. Ideal and non-Ideal Theory. Philosophy & public affairs, 38, 5–36.10.1111/papa.2010.38.issue-1
  • Thoreau, H.D., 1996. Civil disobedience. In: Political Writings, ed. Nancy Rosenblum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Valentini, L., 2009. On the apparent paradox of ideal theory. Journal of political philosophy, 17, 332–355.10.1111/jopp.2009.17.issue-3
  • Valentini, L., 2011. Coercion and Global Justice. American political science review, 105, 205–220.10.1017/S0003055410000559
  • Valentini, L., 2012. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: a conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7, 654–664.10.1111/phco.2012.7.issue-9
  • Waltz, K., 1979. Theory of international relations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Walzer, M., 2004. Arguing About War. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Wenar, L., 2006. Why Rawls is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian. In: Rex Martin and David A. Reidy, eds. Rawls’ law of peoples: a realisitic utopia? Oxford: Blackwell, 95–113.
  • Wenar, L., 2008. Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy & public affairs, 36, 2–32.
  • Wenar, L., 2011. Clean trade in natural resources. Ethics & international affairs, 25, 27–39.
  • Wendt, A., 2003. Why a world state is inevitable. European journal of international relations, 9, 491–542.10.1177/135406610394001
  • Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International organization, 46, 391–425.
  • Ypi, L., 2010. On the confusion between ideal and non-ideal in recent debates on global justice. Political studies, 58, 536–555.
  • Ypi, L., 2012. Global justice & avant garde political agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.