Private association and public brand: the dualistic conception of political parties in the common law world

References

• AEC (Australian Electoral Commission), 2012. Financial disclosure guide for political parties. Canberra: AEC.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, V., 2010. Constitutionalizing secularism, alternative secularisms or liberal-democratic constitutionalism? A critical reading of some Turkish, ECtHR and Indian supreme court cases on ‘secularism’. Utrecht Law Review, 6 (3), 8–35.
   Google Scholar
• Byron, S., 2013. The constitution of France. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Duverger, M., 1954. Political parties: their organization and activity in the modern state. 1st English ed. London: Methuen ( tr. North, B. and R.).
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, K.D., 2007. The cost of democracy: party funding in modern British politics. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, J., 2010. Justice in tribunals. 3rd ed. Sydney: The Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forcese, C. and Freeman, A., 2005. The laws of government: the legal foundations of Canadian democracy. Toronto: Irwin Law.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H., 1959. Unincorporated non-profit associations: their property and liability. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, H., 1977. Unincorporated non-profit associations: their property and liability. Aalen: Scientia Verlag. Revised edition.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, C., 1981. Contract as promise: a theory of contractual obligation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauja, A., 2010. Political parties and elections: legislating for representative democracy. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gauja, A., 2012. The ‘push’ for primaries: what drives party organisational reform in Australia and the United Kingdom? Australian journal of political science, 47 (4), 641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddis, A., 2005. The unsettled legal status of political parties in New Zealand. New Zealand journal of public and international law, 3 (1), 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Geddis, A., 2007. Electoral law in New Zealand: practice and policy. Wellington: Lexis/Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, G., 1974. The death of contract. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International IDEA, 2013 (forthcoming). Political finance around the world: comparative studies and recommendations for reform. International IDEA: Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsen, J., 1995. Political parties and constitutional institutions. In: C. Starck, ed. Studies in German constitutionalism. Nomos: Baden-Baden, 195–243.
   Google Scholar
• Issacharoff, S., 2000. Introduction: the structure of democratic politics. Columbia law review, 100 (3), 593–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issacharoff, S. and Pildes, R., 1998. Politics as markets: partisan lockups and the democratic process. Stanford law review, 50 (3), 643–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil, I. with Campbell, G., eds., 2001. The relational theory of contract: selected works of Ian Macneil. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mersel, Y., 2006. The dissolution of political parties: the problem of internal democracy. International journal of constitutional law, 4 (1), 84–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mileur, J., 1992. Legislating responsibility: American political parties and the law’. In: J. KennethWhite and J. Mileur, eds. Challenges to party government. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 167–189.
   Google Scholar
• Miragliotta, N., 2013. Explaining the (lack of) use of radical candidate selection methods by Australia’s major parties. Australian journal of politics and history, 59 (1), 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C., 2012. Parliamentary elections, representation and the law. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, G., 2011a. Party primaries for candidate selection? Right question, wrong answer. University of New South Wales law journal, 34 (3), 964–983.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, G., 2011b. Legal conceptions of political parties through the lens of anti-discrimination law. In: J-C. Tham, B. Costar and G. Orr, eds. Electoral democracy: Australian prospects. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 120–139.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, N., 2009. The concepts of the public, the private and the political in contemporary western political theory. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 12 (2), 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Pildes, R., 2011. Political parties and constitutionalism. In: T. Ginsburg and R. Dixon, eds. Comparative constitutional law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, R., 2003. Law, pragmatism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N., 2000. Political parties as membership groups. Columbia law review, 100 (3), 813–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, C., 1960. Parties and politics in America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E.E., 1942. Party government. New York, NY: Farrar and Reinhart.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., 1957. Political parties and the German basic law of 1949. Western political quarterly, 10 (3), 527–540.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J., 2010. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge. Reprint (original 1942).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, N., Campbell, N. and Baughen, S., 2011. The law of unincorporated associations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teorell, J., 1999. A deliberative defence of intra-party democracy. Party politics, 5 (3), 363–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., 2004. Political parties as public utilities. Party politics, 10 (6), 701–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., 2012. Constitutionalizing party democracy: the constitutive codification of political parties in post-war Europe. British journal of political science, 42 (1), 187–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, A., 2002. The American direct primary: party institutionalization and transformation in the north. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P., 2000. The modern British party system. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W.E., 1971. Comparative party models: rational-efficient and party democracy. In: W.E. Wright, ed. A comparative study of party organization. ColumbusOH: Charles Merrill, 17–54.
   Google Scholar