Fragments of equality in representative politics

References

• Ankersmit, F.R., 2002. Political representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, L., 2014. Ada Colau: Spain’s anti-eviction crusader. BBC News. Feb 19.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., 1999. Democracy and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, R., 2002. Engineering democracy. Political studies, 50 (1), 102–116.10.1111/post.2002.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1991. Language and symbolic power, trans. J.B. Thompson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., 1990. Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. and Lowndes, V., 2014. Searching for authenticity? Understanding representation in network governance: the case of faith engagement. Public administration, 92 (2), 274–290.10.1111/padm.2014.92.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L., 2011. Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American political science review, 105 (01), 100–114.10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A., 1996. Representative democracy and the environment. In: W.M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft, eds. Democracy and the environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S. and Niemeyer, S., 2008. Discursive representation. American political science review, 102 (04), 481–493.10.1017/S0003055408080325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 2000. Sovereign virtue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R., 2000. Deliberative democracy, ecological representation and risk: towards a democracy of the affected. In: M. Saward, ed. Democratic innovation: deliberation, representation and association. London: Routledge, 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. and Hill, L., 2012. The electoral and political implications of reserved seats for indigenous Australians. Australian journal of political science, 47 (3), 491–505.10.1080/10361146.2012.704004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garsten, B., 2009. Representative government and popular sovereignty. In: I. Shapiro, et al., eds. Political representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C.R., 2009. Making interest: on representation and democratic legitimacy. In: I. Shapiro, et al., eds. Political representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1968 [1651]. Leviathan. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E.F. and Saward, M., eds., 2013. Enacting European citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., 1990. Contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P. and Le Gales, P., 2007. Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments? From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20 (1), 1–21.10.1111/gove.2007.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macoun, A., 2011. Aboriginality and the Northern Territory intervention. Australian journal of political science, 46 (3), 519–534.10.1080/10361146.2011.595700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison, S., 2012. Seven generations behind: representing native nations. Arena, 37 (38), 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. The journal of politics, 61 (3), 628–657.10.2307/2647821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanaro, L., 2012. The democratic legitimacy of self-appointed representatives. The journal of politics, 74 (4), 1094–1107.10.1017/S0022381612000515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, M., 2009. Place, identity and nationhood: the Northern Territory intervention as the final act of a dying nation. Continuum, 23 (6), 803–825.10.1080/10304310903294853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, N., 2014. A rightful place: race, recognition and a more complete Commonwealth. Quarterly essay, 55, 1–72.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, F., 2007. The political egalitarian’s dilemma. Ethical theory and moral practice, 10 (4), 373–387.10.1007/s10677-006-9057-z
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., 1995. The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., 1999. Which equalities matter? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H.F., 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, D., 1981. Equalities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., 1999. Disagreement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J., 2004. The politics of aesthetics, trans. G. Rockhill. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1972. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, J., 2013. The misuse of power, not bad representation: why it is beside the point that no one elected Oxfam. Journal of political philosophy, 22 (2), 204–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M., 2003. Enacting democracy. Political studies, 51 (1), 161–179.10.1111/post.2003.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M., 2010. The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M., 2014. Shape-shifting representation. American political science review, 108 (04), 723–736.10.1017/S0003055414000471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C., 1994. Interests, associations and intermediation in a reformed post-liberal society. In: W. Streeck, ed. Staat und Verbände [State and organisations]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 160–171.10.1007/978-3-322-94220-3
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 2012. Two cheers for anarchism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 1976. Tacit consent and political obligation. Philosophy and public affairs, 5 (3), 274–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q., 1988. Some problems in the analysis of political thought and action. In: J. Tully, ed. Meaning and context: Quentin Skinner and his critics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J., 2006. Equality and difference. In: J.S. Dryzek, B. Honig, and A. Phillips, eds. The Oxford handbook of political theory. Oxford University Press, 470–487.
   Google Scholar
• Thill, C., 2009. Courageous listening, responsibility for the other and the Northern Territory intervention. Continuum, 23 (4), 537–548.10.1080/10304310903012651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudgen, R., 2000. Why warriors lie down and die. Darwin: Aboriginal Resource and Development Services.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., 2011. Representative democracy and its critics. In: S. Alonso, J. Keane, and W. Merkel, eds. The future of representative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M.S., 1998. Voice, trust, and memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar