Political participation, social inequalities, and special veto powers

References

• Abromeit, H., 2002. Wozu braucht man Demokratie? Die postnationale Herausforderung der Demokratietheorie [Why is democracy needed? The postnational challenge of democratic theory]. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.10.1007/978-3-663-11894-7
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J., 1776. Letter to John Penn. In: C.F. Adams, ed. The works of John Adams, Vol. IV (1852–1865). Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co, 203–209.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, S., 2009. Full participation: a comparative study of compulsory voting. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719077623.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I., 2009. Democracy beyond the modernist subject: complexity and the late-modern reconfiguration of legitimacy. In: I. Blühdorn, ed. In search of legitimacy. Policy making in Europe and the challenge of complexity. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, 17–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, N., 1984. The future of democracy: a defense of the rules of the game. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, H., 2009. Demokratie und Lotterie. Das Los als politisches Entscheidungsinstrument von der Antike bis zur EU [Democracy and lottery. The lot as a political decision instrument from antiquity to the EU]. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, H., 2010. Reviving randomness for political rationality: elements of a theory of aleatory democracy. Constellations, 17 (3), 435–454.10.1111/cons.2010.17.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T., 1996. The rule of the many. Fundamental issues in democratic theory. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R.A., 2006. On political equality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R.J., 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices. The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268436.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., 1927. The public and its problems. In: J. Dewey. The later works, vol. 2. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 235–372.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., 2005. Setting the people free. The story of democracy. London: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eley, G., 2002. Forging democracy. The history of the left in Europe, 1850–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J.S., 1991. Democracy and deliberation. New directions for democratic reform. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galston, W., 2011. Telling Americans to vote, or else. New York Times, 6 November, SR9.
   Google Scholar
• Geißel, B. and Joas, M., eds., 2013. Participatory democratic innovations in Europe. Improving the quality of democracy? Opladen: Budrich UniPress.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., 2007. Why we hate politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L., 2006. Low voter turnout in the United States: Is compulsory voting a viable solution? Journal of theoretical politics, 18, 207–232.10.1177/0951629806061868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, L., 2014. Turnout, abstention and democratic legitimacy. In: J. Brennan and L. Hill, eds. Compulsory voting: for and against. New York: Cambridge University Press, 107–153.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J., 2009. The life and death of democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Knaut, A., 2011. Die Quotenfrau: Erfolgsmodell (auch) für substantielle Repräsentation [The quota woman: Successful model (also) for substantive representation]? In: M. Linden and W. Thaa, eds. Krise und Reform politischer Repräsentation [Crisis and reform of political representation]. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 279–301.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H., 2013. Democratic reason. Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A., 1997. Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American political science review, 91 (1), 1–14.10.2307/2952255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, M. and Thaa, W., eds., 2009. Die politische Repräsentation von Fremden und Armen [The political representation of strangers and the poor]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, V.A., 2008. Electoral turnout and income redistribution by the state: a cross-national analysis of the developed democracies. European journal of political research, 47 (2), 161–183.10.1111/ejpr.2008.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, A., 2015a. The history of compulsory voting in europe-democracy’s duty? New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, A., 2015b. The paradox of democratic selection: is sortition better than voting? In: K. Palonen and J.M. Rosales, eds. Parliamentarism and democratic theory historical and contemporary perspectives. Opladen: Budrich University Press, 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B., 1997. The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659935
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T.H., 1950. Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J.P., 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975325
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T., 2002. The deliberative citizen theory and evidence. In: M.X. Deili Caprini, L. Huddy and R.Y. Shapiro, eds. Political decision-making, deliberation and participation. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 151–193.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, R., [1911] 1962. A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Crowell-Collier.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C., 2013. Participatory inequality in the Austerity state. A supply-side approach. In: A. Schäfer and W. Streeck, eds. Politics in the age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 196–218.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A., 1993. Democracy and difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H.F., 1967. The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D. and Pharr, S.J., eds., 2000. Disaffected democracies: what’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 1992. Le Sacre du citoyen. Histoire du suffrage universel en France [The Rite of citizen. History of universal suffrage in France]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2008. Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511755835
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2011. Democratic legitimacy impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., 2011. Republican liberty and compulsory voting. MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/17.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., 2013. Liberalization, inequality and democracy’s discontent. In: A. Schäfer and W. Streeck, eds. Politics in the age of austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 169–195.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M.G., 2008. Demokratietheorien. Eine Einführung [Theories of democracy. An introduction]. 4th ed. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. and Hooghe, M., 2011. Shifting inequalities: patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European societies, 13 (1), 119–142.10.1080/14616696.2010.523476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, P., 2010. The luck of the draw. The Role of lotteries in decision-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., 2013. The crisis in context: democratic capitalism and its contradictions. In: A. Schäfer and W. Streeck, eds. Politics in the age of austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press, 262–284.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., 2014. Buying time the delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Vebra, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E., 1995. Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J.A., 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511793806
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1997. Deferring group representation. In: I. Shapiro and W. Kymlicka, eds. Ethnicity and group rights. New York: NYU Press, 349–376.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar