Sortition, voting, and democratic equality

References

• Amar, Akhil Reed, 1984. Choosing representatives by lottery voting. Yale law journal, 93, 1283–1308.10.2307/796258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Anthony and Carty, Peter, 2008. The Athenian option: Radical reform for the House of Lords. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, John, 1990–1991. Fairness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s., 91, 87–101. Reprinted in Stone, ed. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Buchstein, Hubertus and Hein, Michael, 2009. Randomizing Europe: The lottery as a decision-making procedure for policy creation in the EU. Critical policy studies, 3 (1), 29–57.
   Google Scholar
• Burnheim, John, 2006. Is democracy possible?. 2nd ed.. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callenbach, Ernest and Phillips, Michael, 2008. A citizen legislature. In: Ernest Callenbach, Michael Philips and Keith Sutherland, eds. A citizen legislature/A people’s parliament. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Lyn and Martin, Brian, 1999. Random selection in politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, Benjamin, 1988. The liberty of the ancients compared with that of the moderns. In: Biancamaria Fontana, ed. Political writings. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 309–328.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Ned, Kelly, Janet and Schaefer, Paul, 1986. Citizens panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public administration review, 46 (2), 170–178.10.2307/976169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A., 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delannoi, Gil, Dowlen, Oliver and Stone, Peter, 2013. The lottery as a democratic institution. Studies in public policy 28. Dublin: The Policy Institute, Trinity College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Dienel, Peter C., 1995. Planning cells: A gate to ‘Fractal’ mediation. In: Ortwin Renn, ed. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Dowlen, Oliver, 2008. The political potential of sortition. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, Neil, 1999. Random justice: On lotteries and legal decision-making. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268253.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, Robert, 1980. Politics in renaissance Venice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S., 1991. Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S., 1995. The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S., 2009. When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, Allan, 1977. Manipulation of schemes that mix voting with chance. Econometrica, 45 (3), 665–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Barbara, 2005. Justice by lottery. 2nd ed. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, Alexander A., 2014. Against elections: The lottocratic alternative. Philosophy and public affairs, 42 (2), 135–178.10.1111/papa.2014.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstee, Willem, 1990. Allocation by lot: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Social Science Information, 29 (4), 745–763. Reprinted in Stone, ed. (2011).10.1177/053901890029004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Lesley A., 2003. Pursuing equal opportunities: The theory and practice of egalitarian justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616556
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, Hélène, 2013. Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leib, Ethan, 2004. Deliberative democracy in America: A proposal for a popular branch of government. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López-Guerra, Claudio, 2011. The enfranchisement lottery. Politics, philosophy & economics, 10 (2), 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkopoulou, Anthoula, 2015. The paradox of democratic selection: Is sortition better than voting? In: Kari Palonen and José María Rosales, eds. Parliamentarism and democratic theory: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Barbara Budrich: Opladen, 229–253.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, Bernard, 1997. The principles of representative government. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511659935
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, Richard G., 1984. Lot as a democratic device of selection. Review of politics, 46, 539–560. Reprinted in Stone, ed. (2011).10.1017/S0034670500049226
   Google Scholar
• North, Douglass C., Wallis, John Joseph and Weingast, Barry, 2012. Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John, 1999. A theory of justice. Rev ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John, 1951. Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. The philosophical review, 60 (2), 177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, Ben, 2010. Democracy, political equality, and majority rule. Ethics, 121 (1), 148–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T.M., 1975. Preference and urgency. Journal of philosophy, 72 (19), 655–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya, 1983. Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198284632.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya, 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sher, George, 1980. What makes a lottery fair? Noûs, 14, 203–216. Reprinted in Peter Stone, ed. (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter, 2011a. The luck of the draw: The role of lotteries in decision making. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756100.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter, ed., 2011b. Lotteries in public life: A reader. Imprint academic: Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter, 2009a. The logic of random selection. Political theory, 37 (3), 375–397.10.1177/0090591709332329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Peter, 2009b. Lotteries, justice, and probability. Journal of theoretical politics, 21 (3), 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Keith, 2008. A people’s parliament. In: Ernest Callenbach, Michael Philips and Keith Sutherland, eds. A citizen legislature/A people’s parliament. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Mark and Pearse, Hilary, eds., 2008. Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaras, Alex, 2010. Lot and democratic representation: A modest proposal. Constellations, 17 (3), 455–471.10.1111/cons.2010.17.issue-3
   Google Scholar