Extreme cosmopolitanisms defended

References

• Arneson, R., 1982. The principle of fairness and free-rider problems. Ethics, 92, 616–633.10.1086/292379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R., 2013a. Is patriotism immoral? Philosophic exchange, 13 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, R., 2013b. Paternalism and the principle of fairness. In: C. Coons and M. Weber, eds. Paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–156.10.1017/CBO9781139179003
   Google Scholar
• Blake, M., 2001. Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and public affairs, 30, 257–296.10.1111/papa.2001.30.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. and Risse, M., 2008. Two models of equality and responsibility. Canadian journal of philosophy, 38, 165–199.10.1353/cjp.0.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caney, S., 2011. Humanity, associations, and global justice. Monist, 94, 506–534.10.5840/monist201194426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, chapter 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hurka, T., 1997. The justification of national partiality. In: R. McKim and J. McMahan, eds. The morality of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Julius, A.J., 2003. Basic structure and the value of equality. Philosophy and public affairs, 31, 321–355.10.1111/papa.2003.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N., 2003. Love as valuing a relationship. Philosophical review, 112, 135–189.10.1215/00318108-112-2-135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N., 2010a. Which relationships justify partiality: general considerations and problem cases. In: B. Feltham and J. Cottingham, eds. Partiality and impartiality: morality, special relationships, and the wider world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodny, N., 2010b. Which relationships justify partiality? The case of parents and children. Philosophy and public affairs, 38, 37–75.10.1111/papa.2010.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, J., 1997. The limits of national partiality. In: R. McKim and C. McMahan, eds. The morality of nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107–138.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 1995. On nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2000. Citizenship and national identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2013. Justice for earthlings: essays in political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., 1998. Cosmopolitan respect and patriotic concern. Philosophy and public affairs, 27, 202–224.10.1111/papa.1998.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T., 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and public affairs, 33, 113–147.10.1111/papa.2005.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, P., 1984. Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philosophy and public affairs, 13, 134–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J., 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, M., 2012a. Global justice. In: D. Estlund, ed. Oxford handbook of political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, M., 2012b. On global justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiovanni, A., 2007. Global justice, reciprocity, and the state. Philosophy and public affairs, 35, 3–39.10.1111/papa.2007.35.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S., 1982. The rejection of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S., 2001. Relationships and responsibilities & conceptions of cosmopolitanism, both reprinted in his Boundaries and allegiances: problems of justice and responsibility in liberal thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–110 and 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K., 2004. Justice without borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511490385
   Google Scholar