3,132
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Political realism and the realist ‘Tradition’

References

  • Beitz, C. R. (1999). Political theory and International Relations (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bell, D. (2009). Introduction: Under an empty sky-realism and political thoery. In D. Bell (Ed.), Political thought and international relations: Variations on a realist theme (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bell, D. (2014). What is liberalism? Political theory, 42, 682–715.10.1177/0090591714535103
  • Boucher, D. (1998). Political theories of international relations: From thucydides to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, C., Nardin, T., & Rengger, N. (Eds.). (2002). International relations in political thought: Texts from the ancient Greeks to the first world war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cohen, M. (1984). Moral skepticism and international relations. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13, 299–346.
  • Collingwood, R. G. (1939). An autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Condren, C. (1997). Political theory and the problem of anachronism. In A. Vincent (Ed.), Political theory: Tradition and diversity (pp. 45–66). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813153
  • Craig, C. (2003). Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total war in the realism of Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and Waltz. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.10.7312/crai12348
  • Donelan, M. (1993). Elements of international political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Finlayson, L. (2015). With radicals like these, who needs conservatives? Doom, gloom, and realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory. Early view. Retrieved December 16, 2015, from http://ept.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/30/1474885114568815
  • Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9, 385–411.10.1177/1474885110374001
  • Geuss, R. (2001). History and illusion in politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2005). Outside ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515
  • Geuss, R. (2010). Politics and the imagination. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.10.2307/2095325
  • Goertz, G. (2005). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gray, J. (1995). Enlightenment’s wake: Politics and culture at the close of the modern age. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203450635
  • Gray, J. (2000). Two faces of liberalism (1st ed.). New York, NY: New Press.
  • Gunnell, J. G. (1986). Between philosophy and politics: The alienation of political theory. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Gunnell, J. G. (1987). Political theory: Tradition and interpretation. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Hawthorn, G. (2005). Introduction. In G. Hawthorn (Ed.), In the beginning was the deed (pp. xi–xx). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Honig, B. (1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Honig, B., & Stears, M. (2011). The new realism: From modus vivendi to justice. In J. Floyd & M. Stears (Eds.), Political philosophy versus history? Contextualism and real politics in contemporary political thought (pp. 177–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139003698
  • Jeffrey, R. (2005). Tradition as invention: The ‘traditions tradition’ and the history of ideas in international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34, 57–84.
  • Lynch, D. (2015). China’s futures: PRC elites debate economics, politics, and foreign policy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Mantena, K. (2012). Another realism: The politics of gandhian nonviolence. American Political Science Review, 106, 455–470.10.1017/S000305541200010X
  • McQueen, A. (2016a). Political realism and moral corruption. European Journal of Political Theory. Early view. Retrieved October 1, 2016, from http://ept.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/01/30/1474885114568815
  • McQueen, A. (2016b). Political realism in apocalyptic times. Unpublished manuscript.
  • McQueen, A. (in press). The case for kinship: Political realism and classical realism. In M. Sleat (Ed.), Politics recovered: Essays on realist political thought (chapter 10). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific man vs. power politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1954). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (2nd ed.). New York: Albert A. Knopf.
  • Murray, A. J. H. (1997). Reconstructing realism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Nardin, T. (1992). Ethical traditions in international affairs. In T. Nardin & D. R. Mapel (Eds.), Traditions of international ethics (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511521768
  • Pettit, P. (2015). Political realism meets civic republicanism. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. doi:10.1080/13698230.2017.1293912
  • Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (2007). Lectures on the history of political philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9, 689–701.10.1111/phc3.v9.10
  • Rousseau, J.-J. (1997). Discourse on the origin and the foundations of inequality among men. In V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The discourses and other early political writings (pp. 113–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2009). Hans Morgenthau: Realism and beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2011). The realist case for global reform. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Scheuerman, W. E. (2013). The realist revival in political philosophy, or: Why new is not always improved. International Politics, 50, 798–814.10.1057/ip.2013.39
  • Schlosser, J. A. (2014). Herodotean realism. Political Theory, 42, 239–261.
  • Schmidt, B. C. (1998). The political discourse of anarchy: A disciplinary history of international relations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Schneider, F. (2014). Reconceptualising world order: Chinese political thought and its challenge to International Relations theory. Review of International Studies, 40, 683–703.10.1017/S0260210513000508
  • Sigwart, H.-J. (2013). The logic of legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics, 75, 407–432.10.1017/S0034670513000338
  • Skinner, Q. (1966). The limits of historical explanations. Philosophy, 41, 199–215.10.1017/S003181910005868X
  • Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8, 3–53.10.2307/2504188
  • Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from December 17, 2015, from http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/history/history-ideas-and-intellectual-history/liberty-liberalism-1
  • Skinner, Q. (2008). Hobbes and republican liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sleat, M. (2013). Liberal realism: A realist theory of liberal politics. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719088902.001.0001
  • Sleat, M. (2014). Realism, liberalism and non-ideal theory or, are there two ways to do realistic political theory? Political Studies, 64, 27–41.
  • Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: A conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, 7, 654–664.10.1111/phco.2012.7.issue-9
  • Wang, Y. (2009). China: Between copying and constructing. In A. B. Tickner & O. Weaver (Eds.), International Relations scholarship around the world (pp. 103–119). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Wight, M. (1960). Why is there no international theory? International Relations, 2, 35–48.10.1177/004711786000200104
  • Wight, M. (1991). International theory: The three traditions. G. Wight & B. Porter (Eds.). London: Leicester Universtiy Press.
  • Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument. G. Hawthorn (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.