Pluralism and consensus in deliberative democracy

References

• Besson, S. (2005). The morality of conflict. Study on reasonable disagreement in the law. London: Hart publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Besson, S., & Martí, J. L. (Eds.). (2006). Deliberative democracy and its discontents. National and post-national challenges. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Biondo, F. (2009). Due problemi della teoria della republica deliberativa. Ragion Pratica, 39, 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation. Pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celano, B. (2009). La forza dell’argomento migliore. Diritto & Questione Publicche, 9, 229–255.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & Ph. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (1996). Democracy in capitalist times: Ideals, limits and struggles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, and contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (1993). Making truth safe for democracy. In D. Copp, J. Hampton, & J. Roemer (Eds.), The idea of democracy (pp. 71–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuerstein, M. (2014). Democratic consensus as essential by-product. Journal of Political Philosophy, 22, 282–301.10.1111/jopp.2014.22.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1990). Moral conflict and political consensus. Ethics, 101, 64–88.10.1086/293260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400826339
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, Ch., & Mansbridge, J. (2005). Disagreement and consensus. Journal of Public Deliberation, 1, 348–364.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, Ch. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. (2006). Is the ideal of a deliberative democracy coherent? In S. Besson & J. L. Martí (Eds.), Deliberative democracy and its discontents. National and post-national challenges (pp. 3–25). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic reason: Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of the many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H., & Page, S. (2015). Deliberation and disagreement: Problem solving, prediction, and positive dissensus. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14, 229–254.10.1177/1470594X14544284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larmore, Ch. (1996). The morals of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625091
   Google Scholar
• Maniaci, G. (2009). Quale razionalità per la democrazia deliberativa? Diritto & Questione Publicche, 9, 267–313.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15, 338–368.10.1177/0090591787015003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2006). Conflict and self-interest in deliberation. In S. Besson & J. L. Martí (Eds.), Deliberative democracy and its discontents. National and post-national challenges (pp. 107–132). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., … Martí, J. L. (2010). The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 64–100.10.1111/jopp.2010.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martí, J. L. (2006a). La república deliberativa: una teoria de la democracia. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, J. L. (2006b). The epistemic conception of deliberative democracy defended: Reasons, rightness and equal political autonomy. In S. Besson & J. L. Martí (Eds.), Deliberative democracy and its discontents. National and post-national challenges (pp. 27–56). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, J. L. (2009). Pluralismo, perfezionismo e democrazia deliberative. Ragion Pratica, 39, 249–272.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Ch. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Ch. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nino, C. (1996). The constitution of deliberative democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintore, A. (2009). Procedure democratiche e democrazia deliberative. Diritto & Questione Publicche, 9, 333–346.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. (1995). Strange multiplicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139170888
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–136). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 670–690.10.1177/0090591701029005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar