Democratic deliberation, respect and personal storytelling

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337.10.1086/233897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. (2010). Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 32–63.10.1111/jopp.2010.18.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2005). The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation. Ageing and Society, 25, 245–259.10.1017/S0144686X04002508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1994). In defense of universalism. Yet again! A response to critics of situating the self. New German Critique, 62, 173–189.10.2307/488515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 67–94) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N. (2016). To narrate and denounce: Frederick Douglass and the politics of personal narrative. Political Theory, 44, 240–264.10.1177/0090591714549075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18, 93–116.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. (2013). Why and how narrative matters in deliberative systems. Political Studies, 61, 620–636.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00987.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettschneider, C. (2007). Democratic rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, I. (2011). Respect and the basis of equality. Ethics, 121, 538–571.10.1086/658897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catala, A. (2015). Democracy, trust, and epistemic justice. The Monist, 98, 424–440.10.1093/monist/onv022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C., & Parvin, P. (2011). What kind of dialogue do we need? Gender, deliberation and comprehensive values. In J. Browne (Ed.), Dialogue, politics and gender (pp. 198–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity (pp. 17–34). New York, NY: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Wetherell, M., & Barnett, E. (2006). A citizens council in the making. In P. Littlejohns, M. Rawlins, & A. Weale (Eds.), Patients, the public and priorities in healthcare (pp. 129–138). Radcliffe: Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Dieleman, S. (2015). Epistemic justice and democratic legitimacy. Hypatia, 30, 794–810.10.1111/hypa.2015.30.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., Farina, C., & Heidt, J. (2014). The value of words: Narrative as evidence in policy making. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10, 243–258.10.1332/174426514X13990325021128
   Google Scholar
• Fouke, D. C. (2009). Democratic deliberation and moral awareness. Journal of public deliberation, 5, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1995). What’s critical about critical theory. In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas (pp. 21–55). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative democracy: A sympathetic comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29, 371–418.10.1111/papa.2000.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg-Fernros, H., & Schaffer, J. (2014). The consensus paradox: Does deliberative agreement impede rational discourse?. Political Studies, 62, 99–116.10.1111/1467-9248.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (2002). How storytelling can be empowering. In K. A. Cerulo (Ed.), Culture in mind (pp. 187–208). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. (2000). Democratic deliberation within. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29, 81–109.10.1111/papa.2000.29.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gring-Pemble, L. M. (2001). ‘Are we going to now govern by anecdote?’: Rhetorical constructions of welfare recipients in congressional hearings, debates, and legislation, 1992–1996 Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87, 341–365.10.1080/00335630109384345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. (William Rehg, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, L. D., & Brush, L. D. (2006). Personal experience narrative and public debate. College composition and communication, 57, 694–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P., & Thompson, S. (2002). Toward a democracy of the emotions. Constellations, 9, 106–126.10.1111/cons.2002.9.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Huijer, M. (2008). Storytelling to enrich the democratic debate. Biosocieties, 4, 223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komporozos-Athanasiou, A., & Thompson, M. (2015). The role of emotion in enabling and conditioning public deliberation outcomes: A sociological investigation. Public Administration, 93, 1138–1151.10.1111/padm.12188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, S. (2008). Civil passions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400837281
   Google Scholar
• Larmore, C. (2010). The practices of the self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226468549.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lever, A. (2007). Mill and the secret ballot: Beyond coercion and corruption. Utilitas, 19, 354–378.10.1017/S0953820807002634
   Google Scholar
• Maia, R. C. M., & Garcêz, R. L. O. (2014). Recognition, feelings of injustice and claim justification: A case study of deaf people’s storytelling on the internet. European Political Science Review, 6, 359–382.10.1017/S1755773913000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’ The Journal of Politics, 61, 628–657.10.2307/2647821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Carp, J., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of public deliberation, 2(1), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, C. (2003). Self-transparency and the possibility of deliberative politics. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8, 289–310.10.1080/1356931032000131183
   Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G., & Cohen, B. (Eds.). (2011). Technoscience and environmental justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226673776.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Lee, J. (2006). Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11 American Sociological Review, 71, 699–721.10.1177/000312240607100501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 109–130.10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rummens, S. (2006). Debate: The co-originality of private and public autonomy in deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 469–481.10.1111/jopp.2006.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 72–93.10.1080/00909880500420226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadd, J., Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., Matsuoka, M., Prichard, M., & Carter, V. (2014). The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the ground-truth. Health education & behavior, 41, 281–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347–376.10.1177/0090591797025003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L. (2008). The color-blind double-bind. Communication Theory, 18, 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. K. (1998). Storytelling, sympathy and moral judgment in American abolitionism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 356–377.10.1111/1467-9760.00059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. F. (2014). Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 13, 269–291.10.1177/1470594X13488355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Hughes, J. M. F. (2015). A new perspective on stories in public deliberation. Text & Talk, 35, 531–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, J. (2008). Deliberation, domination and decision-making. Theoria, 55, 104–133.
   Google Scholar
• Streich, G. W. (2002). Constructing multiracial democracy: To deliberate or not to deliberate? Constellations, 9, 127–153.10.1111/cons.2002.9.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. (2006). A new entity in the history of sexuality: The respectable same-sex couple. Feminist Studies, 32, 155–162.10.2307/20459076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1981). A right to do wrong. Ethics, 92, 21–39.10.1086/292295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, S. D. (2000). Wedding bells and baby carriages: Heterosexuals imagine gay families, gay families imagine themselves. In M. Andrews, S. D. Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (Eds.), Lines of narrative (pp. 48–63). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203471005
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. (1998). Voice, trust and memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27, 97–122.10.1111/papa.1998.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo, J. (2007). Sexual stories go to Westminster (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference (pp. 120–135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1997). Feminism and the public sphere. Constellations, 3, 340–363.10.1111/cons.1997.3.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar