Democratic respect and compromiseFootnote

Previous versions of this paper were presented at the Association for Social and Political Philosophy 2015 Annual Conference, University of Amsterdam, June 25–26, 2015; ‘Compromise and Disagreement’, conference at University of Copenhagen, May 27–29, 2015; and Fudan University, Shanghai, China, May 21, 2015.

References

• Arendt, H. (1990). On revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. (2009). The supposed right to a democratic say. In T. Christiano & J. Christman (Eds.), Contemporary debates in political philosophy (pp. 197–212). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beerbohm, E. (2014, February 27–28). The problem of clean hands: Legislative compromise and obstructionism. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (1999). Liberalism and pluralism: Towards a politics of compromise. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Kornprobst, M., & Reh, C. (2012). Introduction: Meeting in the middle. Government and Opposition, 47, 275–295.10.1111/j.1477-7053.2012.01363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, C. (1996). Mutual respect and neutral justification. Ethics, 107, 62–96.10.1086/233697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2003). Democracy and secession. In M. Moore (Ed.), National self-determination and secession. Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Carens, J. H. (1979). Compromises in politics. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Compromise in ethics, law, and politics (123–141). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2008). The constitution of equality: Democratic authority and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, F. J. (2008). Politisk forlig i Folketinget: Partikonkurrence og samarbejde. Aarhus: Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Estlund, D. (2008). Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fumurescu, A. (2013). Compromise: A political and philosophical history. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139333689
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2012). The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., & O’Flynn, I. (2013). Can a compromise be fair? Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 12, 115–135.10.1177/1470594X12447773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepora, C., & Goodin, R. (2013). On complicity and compromise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677900.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Margalit, A. (2010). On compromise and rotten compromises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, S. C. (2005). Principled compromise and the abortion controversy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33, 317–348.10.1111/papa.2005.33.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, S. C. (2011). Moral compromise, civic friendship, and political reconciliation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14, 581–602.10.1080/13698230.2011.617120
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1989). On liberty and other writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2013). Consensus, compromise, justice and legitimacy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16, 557–572.10.1080/13698230.2013.810393
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2008). Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2015a). The non-instrumental value of democracy: The freedom argument. Constellations, 22, 267–278.10.1111/1467-8675.2015.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2015b). Non-domination and democratic legitimacy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18, 424–439.10.1080/13698230.2015.1033862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2016). Kant, freedom as independence, and democracy. The Journal of Politics, 78, 792–805.10.1086/685448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. Forthcoming. Compromise and toleration: Responding to disagreement. In C. F. Rostbøll & T. Scavenius (eds.). Compromise and disagreement in contemporary political theory. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. (2011). Just democracy: The Rawls-Machiavelli programme. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock, D. (2013). On the possibility of principled moral compromise. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16, 537–556.10.1080/13698230.2013.810392
   Google Scholar