Foucault, democracy and the ambivalence of rights

References

• Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (pp. 3–18). (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Palo Alto: Stanford up.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. (1988). Propositions on citizenship. Ethics, 98, 723–730.10.1086/293001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitz, C. R. (2011). The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2000). Suffering rights as paradoxes. Constellations, 7, 208–229.10.1111/cons.2000.7.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2004). “The most we can hope for …” human rights and the politics of fatalism. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 451–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. Cambridge: MA, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (2000). The end of human rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Douzinas, C. (2013). The paradoxes of human rights. Constellations, 20, 51–67.10.1111/cons.2013.20.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R., Thomas, N., Robert, N., John, R., Judith, J. T. & Thomas, S. (1997). Assisted suicide: The philosophers’ brief (pp. 41–47). The New York Review of Books.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnis, J. (2011). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2000). Confronting governments: Human rights. In James D. Faubion (ed.) Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 3). New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse, and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirth, A. (1982). Human rights: Essays on justification and applications. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P. (2011). Humanist and political perspectives on human rights. Political Theory, 39, 439–467.10.1177/0090591711408246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 564–581.10.1017/S1537592714001595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, B. (2015). Foucault and the Politics of Rights. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, R. (2007). ‘The Solzhenitsyn effect’: East European dissidents and the demise of the revolutionary privilege. Human Rights Quarterly, 879–907.10.1353/hrq.2007.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J. D. (2008). What is a “right to have rights”? Three images of the politics of human rights. American Political Science Review, 102, 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishay, M. (2008). The history of human rights: From ancient times to the globalization era. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivison, D., & Patton, P. (2000). Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society: Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism (p. 257). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, C. B. (2010). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (2013). Digital disconnect: How capitalism is turning the Internet against democracy. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moyn, S. (2014). A powerless companion: Human rights in the age of neoliberalism. Law & Contemporary Problems, 77, 147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Paras, E. (2006). Foucault 2.0: Beyond power and knowledge. New York: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. (2005). Foucault, critique and rights. Critical Horizons, 6, 267–287.10.1163/156851605775009456
   Google Scholar
• Perugini, N., & Gordon, N. (2015). The human right to dominate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2015). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, A. (2011). Enacting the right to have rights: Jacques Rancière’s critique of Hannah Arendt. European Journal of Political Theory, 10, 22–45.10.1177/1474885110386004
   Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, Lisa H. (2002). Feminist analyses of oppression and the discourse of “rights”: A response to Wendy Brown. Social Theory and Practice, 28, 465–480.10.5840/soctheorpract200228319
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valentini, L. (2012). In what sense are human rights political? A preliminary exploration. Political Studies, 60, 180–194.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00905.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2004). The rule of law as a theater of debate. In R. Dworkin & J. Burley (Eds.), Dworkin and his critics: With replies by Dworkin (pp. 319–336). London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, R. (2006). Foucault the neohumanist? Chronicle of Higher Education, September 1, Available from http://www.chronicle.com/article/Foucault-the-Neohumanist-/23118
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (2005). Against human rights. In A. Singh Rathore & A. Cistelecan (Eds.), Wronging Rights? Philosophical Challenges to Human Rights (pp. 149–167). New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar