Kant and the critique of the ethics-first approach to politics

References

• Byrd, B. S., & Hruschka, J. (2010). Kant’s doctrine of right: A commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712050
   Google Scholar
• Demiray, M. R. (n.d.). The intrinsic normativity of law in light of kant’s doctrine of right. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. (2005). Kant’s politics: Provisional theory for an uncertain world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flikschuh, K. (2000). Kant and modern political philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487187
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2008). Philosophy and real politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835515
   Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (2009). On the very idea of a metaphysics of morals. In: Politics and the Imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregor, M. (1963). Laws of freedom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, P. (2002). Kant’s deductions of the principles of right. In M. Timmons (Ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (pp. 23–64). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, L. (2010). Kant on the right to freedom: A defense. Ethics, 120(4), 791–819.10.1086/653687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1996). Practical Philosophy. (Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (2007). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. In G. Zöller & R. B. Louden (Eds.), Anthropology, history, and education (pp. 227–429). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kersting, W. (1992). Politics, freedom, and order: Kant’s political philosophy. In P. Guyer (Ed.), The cambridge companion to Kant (pp. 342–366). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A. (2010). Rawlsian theory and the circumstances of politics. Political Theory, 38(5), 658–683.10.1177/0090591710372862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pippin, R. B. (2006). Mine and Thine? The Kantian State. In P. Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy (pp. 416–446). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. W. (2012). Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive liberalism’? In E. Ellis (Ed.), Kant’s political theory: Interpretations and applications (pp. 74–100). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripstein, A. (2009). Force and freedom: Kant’s legal and political philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674054516
   Google Scholar
• Ripstein, A. (2012). Form and matter in kantian political philosophy: A reply. European Journal of Philosophy, 20(3), 487–496.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00558.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E. (2013). Consensus, compromise, justice, and legitimacy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(4), 557–572.10.1080/13698230.2013.810393
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in normative political theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(10), 689–701.10.1111/phc3.v9.10
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2016). Kant, freedom as independence, and democracy. The Journal of Politics, 78(3), 792–805.10.1086/685448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. J. (2002). Political obligation and authority. In R. L. Simon (Ed.), The blackwell guide to social and political philosophy (pp. 17–37). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (1999). Law and disagreement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262138.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2000). What is cosmopolitan? Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 227–243.10.1111/1467-9760.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. (2013). Political political theory: An inaugural lecture. Journal of Political Philosophy, 21(1), 1–23.10.1111/jopp.2013.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willaschek, M. (2009). Right and coercion: Can Kant’s conception of right be derived from his moral theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 17(1), 49–70.10.1080/09672550802610982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (2005). In the beginning was the deed. Realism and moralism in political argument. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2002). The final form of Kant’s practical philosophy. In M. Timmons (Ed.), Kant’s metaphysics of morals: Interpretative essays (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar