Deliberative democracy as a critical theory

References

• Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J. S. (2004). Deliberation day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6(4), 400–425.10.1111/1467-9760.00061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1999). Theories, practices, and pluralism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 29(4), 459–480.10.1177/004839319902900401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (2000). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böker, M. (2017). Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics. Contemporary Political Theory, 16(1), 19–40.10.1057/cpt.2016.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böker, M., & Elstub, S. (2015). The possibility of critical mini-publics: Realpolitik and normative cycles in democratic theory. Representation, 51(1), 125–144.10.1080/00344893.2015.1026205
   Google Scholar
• Brincat, S. (2011). On the methods of critical theory: Advancing the project of emancipation beyond the early Frankfurt school. International Relations, 26(2), 218–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. A. (2013). The lessons of Rancière. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (2008). Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029651
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N., & Böker, M. (2016). Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: A research agenda. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 173–190.10.1007/s11077-015-9238-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Discursive designs: Critical theory and political institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 656–679.10.2307/2111287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy. Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1995). Critical theory as a research program. In S. K. White (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Habermas (pp. 97–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052144120X
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562947.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2016). The forum, the system, and the polity: Three varieties of democratic theory. Political Theory. Published online before print. doi:10.1177/0090591716659114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, J. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 48–60.10.2307/2938955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. (2010). The third generation of deliberative democracy. Political Studies Review, 8(3), 291–307.10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Boswell, J. (in press). Studying public deliberation after the systemic turn: The crucial role for interpretive research. Policy & Politics, 45(2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, O. (2015). Scripting deliberative policy-making: Dramaturgic policy analysis and engagement know-how. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(3), 269–285.10.1080/13876988.2014.946663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2001). The rule of reasons: Three models of deliberative democracy. Ratio Juris, 14(4), 345–378.10.1111/raju.2001.14.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Forst, R. (2012). The right to justification: Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(25–26), 56–80.10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, M. (2006). Ideology and political theory. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(1), 3–22.10.1080/13569310500395834
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 338–367.10.1111/1467-9760.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution. Political Theory, 33(3), 397–419.10.1177/0090591704271990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Warren, M. E. (2011). The Participedia project: An introduction. International Public Management Journal, 14(3), 341–362.10.1080/10967494.2011.618309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (2008). Innovating democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547944.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gregoratto, F. (2015). Political power and its pathologies: An attempt to reconsider Habermas’ critical theory of democracy. Constellations, 22(4), 533–542.10.1111/1467-8675.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodnick, S. (2005). Rediscovering radical democracy in Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms. Constellations, 12(3), 392–408.10.1111/cons.2005.12.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (2014). Introduction. In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process (pp. 1–8). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The tasks of a critical theory of society. In S. E. Bronner & D. M. Kellner (Eds.), Critical theory and society: A reader (pp. 292–312). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, S. (1999). Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics. Futures, 31(7), 655–669.10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. (2004). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Dryzek, J. S., & Hunold, C. (2007). Turning up the heat: Partisanship in deliberative innovation. Political Studies, 55(2), 362–383.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. (1972). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, D. C., & McCarthy, T. (1994). Critical theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, M. (2016, February 18–19). Justice, ideology, and the political philosopher as public intellectual. Paper presented at Normative Interventions: A Conference on the Relation between Political Philosophy and Practice, University College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Knops, A. (2006). Delivering deliberation’s emancipatory potential. Political Theory, 34(5), 594–623.10.1177/0090591706290780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kompridis, N. (2006). Critique and disclosure: Critical theory between past and future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, C. (2014). Facilitating deliberation: The role of impartial intermediaries in deliberative mini-publics. In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process (pp. 77–92). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. (1990). Critical theory in political practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. (2009). The imaginary reconstitution of society: Utopia as method. In Tom Moylan & Raffaella Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia method vision: The use value of social dreaming (pp. 47–68). Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, C. (2013). Activist political theory and the challenge of global justice. Ethics & Global Politics, 6(2), 63–73.10.3402/egp.v6i2.21627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2016). The UK’s EU referendum is not worthy of our respect. openDemocracyUK online blog post. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/alfred-moore/disrespecting-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2016). The populist challenge. democraciaAbierta online blog post. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from https://www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/chantal-mouffe/populist-challenge
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S. (2011). The emancipatory effect of deliberation: Empirical lessons from mini-publics. Politics & Society, 39(1), 103–140.10.1177/0032329210395000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norval, A. (2006). Democratic identification. Political Theory, 34(2), 229–255.10.1177/0090591705281714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, I., & Sood, G. (2014). What would dahl say? An appraisal of the democratic credentials of deliberative polls® and other mini-Publics. In K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, & M. Setälä (Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process (pp. 41–58). Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D. (2013). Activist political theory and the question of power. Ethics & Global Politics, 6(2), 85–91.10.3402/egp.v6i2.21316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2016). Brexit, deliberative democracy, and the unforced force of the better argument. Personal online blog post. Retrieved April 21, 2017, from https://johnrparkinson.wordpress.com/2016/07/05/brexit-deliberative-democracy-and-the-unforced-force-of-the-better-argument/
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2008a). Emancipation or accommodation?. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 34(7), 707–736.10.1177/0191453708093083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2008b). Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical theory. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostbøll, C. F. (2009). Dissent, criticism, and transformative political action in deliberative democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 12(1), 19–36.10.1080/13698230902738577
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. M. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376.10.1177/0090591797025003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. W. (1990). Political activist as ethnographer. Social Problems, 37(4), 629–648.10.2307/800586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Spörndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: A discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1, 21–48.10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002
   Google Scholar
• Strydom, P. (2011). Contemporary critical theory and methodology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. (2008). Pre-emptive democracy: Oligarchic tendencies in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 56(1), 127–147.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00676.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. (2002). Political philosophy as a critical activity. Political Theory, 30(4), 533–555.10.1177/0090591702304005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, H., Norval, A., Landman, T., & Pretty, J. (2003). Open citizens’ juries and the politics of sustainability. Political Studies, 51(2), 282–299.10.1111/1467-9248.00424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2002). Deliberative democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today: Challenges for the 21st century (pp. 173–202). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. K. (1986). Foucault’s challenge to critical theory. American Political Science Review, 80(02), 419–432.10.2307/1958266
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690.10.1177/0090591701029005004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypi, L. (2012). Global justice and avant-garde political agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar