Unequally egalitarian? Defending the credentials of social egalitarianism

References

• Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.10.1086/233897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2010a). The imperative of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400836826
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2010b). The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 40(sup1), 1–23.10.1080/00455091.2010.10717652
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2014 February 11). Social movements, experiments in living and moral progress: Case studies from Britain’s abolition of slavery. The Lindley lecture. University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2015). Moral bias and corrective practices: A pragmatist perspective. Proceedings & Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 89, 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bidadanure, J. (2016). Making sense of age-group justice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(3), 234–260.10.1177/1470594X16650542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. (1989). On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics, 99(4), 906–944.10.1086/293126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordelli, C. (2015). Justice as fairness and relational resources. Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 86–110.10.1111/jopp.2015.23.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourie, C. 2012. What is social equality? An analysis of status equality as a strongly egalitarian ideal. Res Publica, 18, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Fourie, C., Schuppert, F., & Wallimann-Helmer, I. (Eds.). (2015). Social equality: On what it means to be equals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gheaus, A. (2018). Hikers in flip-flops: Luck egalitarianism, democratic equality and the of justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 35(1), 54–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2012). Democratic egalitarianism versus luck egalitarianism. Philosophical Topics, 40(1), 117–134.10.5840/philtopics20124018
   Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2015a). Luck egalitarianism. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2015b). Luck egalitarians versus relational egalitarians: On the prospects of a pluralist account of egalitarian justice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45(2), 220–241.10.1080/00455091.2015.1061369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTernan, E. (2016). How to be a responsibility-sensitive egalitarian: From metaphysics to social practice. Political Studies, 64(3), 748–764.10.1111/1467-9248.12208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, T., & Van-Damme, P. (2018). “Equality, pluralism, and relevance.” Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1976). Social justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1998). Equality and justice. In A. Mason (Ed.), Ideals of equality (pp. 21–36). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2008). What should egalitarians believe. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(2), 119–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. (2004). When does equality matter? Conference on Equality, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, April 2.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, S. (2003). What is egalitrianism? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(1), 5–39.10.1111/papa.2003.31.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemmel, C. (2011). Why relational egalitarians should care about distributions. Social Theory and Practice, 37(3), 365–390.10.5840/soctheorpract201137323
   Google Scholar
• Schemmel, C. (2012). Distributive and relational equality. Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 11(2), 123–148.10.1177/1470594X11416774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavny, A., & Parr, T. (2015). Harmless discrimination. Legal Theory, 21, 100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, M. (1992). Moral responsibility and the boundaries of community. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226763255.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, respect, and the egalitarian ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 27(2), 97–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. (2015). Social equality and social inequality. In C. Fourie, F. Schuppert, & I. Wallimann-Helmer, Social Equality (pp. 209–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199331109.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., & De-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278268.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar